I agree, I was actually going to get a PS3 but couldn't be bothered with the wait. I think this thought is echoed by thousands if not millions. Console gamers with the 360 have already got what they want, no point in getting both. Last generation there was actually points in getting both the Xbox and PS2, I got them both and used them both. They just too similar now to buy both, so people go for the cheaper one.TrueMusou wrote:
As of now the 360 and PS3 is nearly neck to neck in respect to technological results from games (360 is leading a bit...but it was released several months earlier). The PS3 has technological potential that the 360 doesn't. So the most microsoft can do with their next console is match what the PS3 has.jord wrote:
Nobody uses all the memory anyway. I don't even use 1 fifth of it with all my game saves.Mekstizzle wrote:
Actually you can get a Premium 360 for £250 and a PS3 40GB for £280. £30 difference. Not that much. Since the PS3 comes with a bigger hard drive, Free Online and Blu-Ray, I'd say that it ain't that bad. The price difference isn't that much anymore. Although an X360 Arcade does look like a good deal. Actually....it isn't considering what you get.You mean like how the 360 can do everything the PS3 can?TrueMusou wrote:
Yeah, and you'd have to dish out another 400+ dollars for the new XBOX 540 that does the same thing the matured PS3 can do.
That's Blu ray disc aside.