Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6887|The Land of Scott Walker
Iran tested a newly-developed ballistic missile on the day of the Annapolis conference, Channel 10 reported Wednesday.  The Ashoura missile has a range of 2,000 kilometers and is capable of reaching Israel, US Army bases in the Middle East and eastern European cities, including Moscow, said the TV channel.  According to the report, the new missile is an improvement on the existing Shihab-3 missile. The Ashoura uses solid fuel instead of the Shihab's liquid fuel, giving it a significantly faster launch sequence which is harder to detect.

Iranian Defense Minister Gen. Mostafa Muhammad-Najjar had announced the development of the new missile on the day of the summit, but had not specified whether it had actually been tested.  According to the country's IRNA news agency, Najjar said the missile was named the "Ashoura," meaning "the tenth day" in Farsi - a sacred reference among Shi'ite Muslims to the martyrdom of the third imam.  The Iranian defense minister said that "the production of the new missile was one of the Defense Ministry's greatest achievements."  Analysts believe much of Iran's military production has benefited from assistance from Russia, China and other countries, but many of their weapons development claims have not been independently verified.  Recent weapons development has been motivated by Iran's standoff with the US over its controversial nuclear program.

The Shihab-3, which means "shooting star" in Farsi, has a range of at least 1,300 kilometers.  In 2005, Iranian officials said they had improved the range of the Shihab-3 to 2,000 kilometers, a range equal to that of the new missile reported Wednesday.  Experts also believe Iran is developing the Shihab-4 missile, thought to have a range between 2,000 and 3,000 kilometers that would enable it to hit much of Europe.
-----------
Iiiiiiiinteresting.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7086
Patriot 2
Mr.Dooomed
Find your center.
+752|6770

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Patriot 2
w00t
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6766|New Haven, CT
Will they not miss as much as the first ones did? (Patriot 2)
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6732|Éire
How dare they spend money on defence.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7204

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
How dare they want to destroy Israel.
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|7005|British Columbia, Canada

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
How are missiles defensive?
Superslim
BF2s Frat Brother
+211|7134|Calgary

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
who are they afraid of??
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7204

LT.Victim wrote:

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
How are missiles defensive?
They are a very good defense if you understand warfare.
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|7005|British Columbia, Canada

usmarine2005 wrote:

LT.Victim wrote:

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
How are missiles defensive?
They are a very good defense if you understand warfare.
Wouldn't something like NORAD be defensive..

Missiles are offensive.. unless you threaten to use them against other nations to keep them from invading.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6887|The Land of Scott Walker

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
Bit big and range a bit long for defense.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6732|Éire

Stingray24 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
Bit big and range a bit long for defense.
So the US, Russia, UK, France, Israel etc. only have missiles that can reach targets within their own boundaries?

Iran's neighbour Israel has enough firepower to blow them to kingdom come, why shouldn't Iran develop similar capabilities? ...not that I agree with arms races or aggressive foreign policies.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7204

Braddock wrote:

...not that I agree with arms races or aggressive foreign policies.
All evidence points to the contrary.
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|7005|British Columbia, Canada

Braddock wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

How dare they spend money on defence.
Bit big and range a bit long for defense.
So the US, Russia, UK, France, Israel etc. only have missiles that can reach targets within their own boundaries?

Iran's neighbor Israel has enough firepower to blow them to kingdom come, why shouldn't Iran develop similar capabilities? ...not that I agree with arms races or aggressive foreign policies.
Mutually Assured Destruction is a good thing, seemed to work for the US and USSR.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6887|The Land of Scott Walker
As I said before MAD requires that all players at the table be in possession of all their mental marbles.  The leader of Iran is a few short.
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7158
Iran stopped their nuke program in 03... lmao...
Love is the answer
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,992|7074|949

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

Iran stopped their nuke program in 03... lmao...
Yeah because testing a missile is the same as firing a nuclear weapon.  Good one, chief.

Good for them.  Ours are still bigger (and that's all that counts).
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6933|Northern California
Where'd the test fire their missile?  They definitely didn't do it to the south.

Look out Israel!!  (not that Israel has to worry)
Arcano-D.E.S
Member
+13|6988
Missiles can be used for many different reasons. Offensive or defensive it matters only how you use them.
Defiance
Member
+438|7113

Stingray24 wrote:

Iiiiiiiinteresting.
If that's all you have to say on the topic, no it's not. Woot, another country is developing missiles, it's not surprising since there's currently another country politically raping them at the moment.

However, that has as much to do with it as does the fact that it can reach Israel.

Why is this news?
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7158

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

Iran stopped their nuke program in 03... lmao...
Yeah because testing a missile is the same as firing a nuclear weapon.  Good one, chief.

Good for them.  Ours are still bigger (and that's all that counts).
I'm on your side... lol
I was being sarcastic... Aquavelvajihad isn't gonna stop his quest for nuke weapons... The only hope is he gets voted out
and someone a little saner leads Iran... Most Iranians(in the US) i know arent behind this kook anyway
Love is the answer
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7113|UK
Go IRAN!  ALLAH HU AKBAR!
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7204

m3thod wrote:

Go IRAN!  ALLAH HU AKBAR!
Where is MI5 when you need them.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6887|The Land of Scott Walker

Defiance wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Iiiiiiiinteresting.
Why is this news?
If it wasn't we wouldn't be discussing it now would we.  Would you prefer a thread on Hillary Duff instead?
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6984|Texas - Bigger than France

Stingray24 wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Iiiiiiiinteresting.
Why is this news?
If it wasn't we wouldn't be discussing it now would we.  Would you prefer a thread on Hillary Duff instead?
Well....yes actually

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard