That was a terrible comicFreezer7Pro wrote:
You know what this means?
It means that all faggotry for 4chan will be transferred to other forums. Millions of /b/tards are now without home. They'll come. Just wait!
Liek this:
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … wsdone.png
None of them have acted in the same way as they would in /b/. So as far as my concerns go, they can stay. As long as they behave differently here.Simon wrote:
Plenty are already here.Zimmer wrote:
I will have my ban bat at the ready to ping them away again. No /b/ tards are getting in here. Ever.Poseidon wrote:
I really didn't mind 4chan until the school shooting stuff happened.
Maybe this'll stop them, maybe it won't. If someone posts it elsewhere, most likely people will report it and stop it on time. The people of 4chan think everything's a joke.
No Pos, ban bat. Much more powerful. It also has spikes on the end just incase I miss one of the /b/ guys; I can still rip off their limbs.
no sapm plox email ur reply back asapPoseidon wrote:
Banstick?Zimmer wrote:
I will have my ban bat at the ready to ping them away again. No /b/ tards are getting in here. Ever.Poseidon wrote:
I really didn't mind 4chan until the school shooting stuff happened.
Maybe this'll stop them, maybe it won't. If someone posts it elsewhere, most likely people will report it and stop it on time. The people of 4chan think everything's a joke.
http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w103 … nstick.jpgwow u ar so funne did u no dat, i tink u ar da funnies man on earf, u ar a good gui, i liek u, u shuld hav a show on teeveeMitch wrote:
dunn dunnnn DUNNNN!!!!!!!!!Freezer7Pro wrote:
Sorry, Zimmer. You're already too late.
You're already too late...
*SHREAK!*
Only because of the anonymityZimmer wrote:
None of them have acted in the same way as they would in /b/. So as far as my concerns go, they can stay. As long as they behave differently here.Simon wrote:
Plenty are already here.Zimmer wrote:
I will have my ban bat at the ready to ping them away again. No /b/ tards are getting in here. Ever.
oh, and being afraid of your mighty-pimped out banstick .
Last edited by Simon (2007-12-15 12:40:35)
Zimmer wrote:
None of them have acted in the same way as they would in /b/. So as far as my concerns go, they can stay. As long as they behave differently here.Simon wrote:
Plenty are already here.Zimmer wrote:
I will have my ban bat at the ready to ping them away again. No /b/ tards are getting in here. Ever.
No Pos, ban bat. Much more powerful. It also has spikes on the end just incase I miss one of the /b/ guys; I can still rip off their limbs.
BETTER?
Ban Bat will consume you all.
Damm that gave me a hardon in a bad wayPoseidon wrote:
http://www.kultofathena.com/images%5CYK0413_l.jpgZimmer wrote:
None of them have acted in the same way as they would in /b/. So as far as my concerns go, they can stay. As long as they behave differently here.Simon wrote:
Plenty are already here.
No Pos, ban bat. Much more powerful. It also has spikes on the end just incase I miss one of the /b/ guys; I can still rip off their limbs.
BETTER?
I made it at 5:30 in the morning after three cups of coffee - the kind of coffee that looks more like antimatter.Mek-Izzle wrote:
That was a terrible comicFreezer7Pro wrote:
You know what this means?
It means that all faggotry for 4chan will be transferred to other forums. Millions of /b/tards are now without home. They'll come. Just wait!
Liek this:
http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb8/ … wsdone.png
And I didn't draw it seriously at all due to program instability. It's really funny when the program crashes when you click "Save As..."...
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Why do you guys care about 4chan so much? The way you attack it, its like the earlier stages of the Nazis going after Jews.
Persoanlly I don't care but I'm tired of all these "4chan sucks" threads.
Persoanlly I don't care but I'm tired of all these "4chan sucks" threads.
i would like to know alsoKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Wait - how was it connected to school shootings?
That quote came from the movie "Grandma's Boy" for those of you who don't know........get a clue people watch some T.V. and fry your brains a little!
Wow, Godwin'ed a 4chan thread. Solid.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Why do you guys care about 4chan so much? The way you attack it, its like the earlier stages of the Nazis going after Jews.
Persoanlly I don't care but I'm tired of all these "4chan sucks" threads.
That Jokela guy made a post there saying he was gonna do it, and he got some replies saying "DO IT FAGGOT" and stuff. Now everyone unfamiliar to 4chan thinks that's the place where maniacs plan their shootings, etcetera, etcetera...ig wrote:
i would like to know alsoKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Wait - how was it connected to school shootings?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
The shooters went onto 4chan right before their shootings and said their intentions. The 4chan guys of course didn't take them seriously (if some one on this site said he would shoot up a place would you beleive him?) and posted stuff like "do it faggot". However by that time 4chan could respond he guy was already shooting up his public place of choice so despite having to direct involment the anti-4chan people claim it was 4chan that drove them. It is exactly like how Jack Thompson blames Doom, Counter-Strike and Grand-Theft-Auto on every act of violence.ig wrote:
i would like to know alsoKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Wait - how was it connected to school shootings?
1. I dunno if "would you believe him" was a rhetorical question, but I certainly would. I'd infact call the police. Better safe than sorry.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
The shooters went onto 4chan right before their shootings and said their intentions. The 4chan guys of course didn't take them seriously (if some one on this site said he would shoot up a place would you beleive him?) and posted stuff like "do it faggot". However by that time 4chan could respond he guy was already shooting up his public place of choice so despite having to direct involment the anti-4chan people claim it was 4chan that drove them. It is exactly like how Jack Thompson blames Doom, Counter-Strike and Grand-Theft-Auto on every act of violence.ig wrote:
i would like to know alsoKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Wait - how was it connected to school shootings?
2. There's no way to prove that he didn't the replies. Don't you think people TELLING HIM TO, especially a person not right in the mind would further make him want to?
3. It's nothing like Jack Thompson vs. GTA. At all. In GTA, you don't see subliminal messages telling you to go shoot up a mall, or go bring a rocket launcher into Las Vegas and blow up a casino.
We need 4chan to stay open. We don't need the retards scattering about. Keep them in one place.
No, 4chan members aren't good people.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
The shooters went onto 4chan right before their shootings and said their intentions. The 4chan guys of course didn't take them seriously (if some one on this site said he would shoot up a place would you beleive him?) and posted stuff like "do it faggot". However by that time 4chan could respond he guy was already shooting up his public place of choice so despite having to direct involment the anti-4chan people claim it was 4chan that drove them. It is exactly like how Jack Thompson blames Doom, Counter-Strike and Grand-Theft-Auto on every act of violence.ig wrote:
i would like to know alsoKEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Wait - how was it connected to school shootings?
Don't defend them.
AHAHAHHAHAAAHAHAHHA!! Haaahahahahhahaaaa! Haaahahaa.... Ha... Ha...Poseidon wrote:
1. I dunno if "would you believe him" was a rhetorical question, but I certainly would. I'd infact call the police. Better safe than sorry.
Rules 19 and 20. Read them. You'd have to call the cops 20 times a day if you'd call for every "Imma shoot X at Y with my Z while I X2" thread.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Wow, Godwin'ed a 4chan thread. Solid.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Why do you guys care about 4chan so much? The way you attack it, its like the earlier stages of the Nazis going after Jews.
Persoanlly I don't care but I'm tired of all these "4chan sucks" threads.
Last edited by Masterstyle (2007-12-15 13:06:26)
I never said they are good people but give me a break if someone posts on the internet that they will shoot up a place would you beleive them?FFLink13 wrote:
No, 4chan members aren't good people.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
The shooters went onto 4chan right before their shootings and said their intentions. The 4chan guys of course didn't take them seriously (if some one on this site said he would shoot up a place would you beleive him?) and posted stuff like "do it faggot". However by that time 4chan could respond he guy was already shooting up his public place of choice so despite having to direct involvement the anti-4chan people claim it was 4chan that drove them. It is exactly like how Jack Thompson blames Doom, Counter-Strike and Grand-Theft-Auto on every act of violence.ig wrote:
i would like to know also
Don't defend them.
or we could just kill them allusmarine2005 wrote:
We need 4chan to stay open. We don't need the retards scattering about. Keep them in one place.
I got nukes, can you supply the plane to take them?usmarine2005 wrote:
or we could just kill them allusmarine2005 wrote:
We need 4chan to stay open. We don't need the retards scattering about. Keep them in one place.
Let them die slowly. Much more satisfying.Zimmer wrote:
I got nukes, can you supply the plane to take them?usmarine2005 wrote:
or we could just kill them allusmarine2005 wrote:
We need 4chan to stay open. We don't need the retards scattering about. Keep them in one place.
I don't wanna read the rules. I'm a bad boy. I break them. I stated HERE. If someone posted HERE something like that I'd call the cops. I wouldn't know who posted what on 4chan because I don't go there.Freezer7Pro wrote:
AHAHAHHAHAAAHAHAHHA!! Haaahahahahhahaaaa! Haaahahaa.... Ha... Ha...Poseidon wrote:
1. I dunno if "would you believe him" was a rhetorical question, but I certainly would. I'd infact call the police. Better safe than sorry.
Rules 19 and 20. Read them. You'd have to call the cops 20 times a day if you'd call for every "Imma shoot X at Y with my Z while I X2" thread.
Sorry if I'm not one of the 4chan sheep who believe that site's their life...like you.
Now go catch a bullet with your forehead because it's closed down.
Bamboo in the fingernails and death of 1000 cuts? Good to go the ol' ancient way.stryyker wrote:
Let them die slowly. Much more satisfying.Zimmer wrote:
I got nukes, can you supply the plane to take them?usmarine2005 wrote:
or we could just kill them all
Last edited by Poseidon (2007-12-15 13:18:01)
Leez do tis.......I vote 4 genital herpesstryyker wrote:
Let them die slowly. Much more satisfying.Zimmer wrote:
I got nukes, can you supply the plane to take them?usmarine2005 wrote:
or we could just kill them all