Who would win in a fight...

2007-12-15 11:22:07

#26

Funky_Finny: Banned; +456|6525|Carnoustie, Scotland

stryyker wrote:
kptk92 wrote:
Funky_Finny wrote:
Oh, this is where it came from.
And you get away from a ban

Seriously, the other guys get straight ban, and this kid doesnt?
I don't know... because this one is an actual question and not 12 year old fuckle shit?

Yeah, think so
Oh well, idc, I got a sig out of it.

Last edited by Funky_Finny (2007-12-15 11:22:45)

2007-12-15 11:22:29

#27

kptk92: u; +972|6801|tc_london

stryyker wrote:
kptk92 wrote:
Funky_Finny wrote:
Oh, this is where it came from.
And you get away from a ban

Seriously, the other guys get straight ban, and this kid doesnt?
I don't know... because this one is an actual question and not 12 year old fuckle shit?

PM a mod?

I dont know anymore, if I got a penny for every time a mod has said: "PM a mod about the problem", I'd be dead rich

2007-12-15 11:23:18

#28

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7113|California

kptk92 wrote:
stryyker wrote:
kptk92 wrote:

And you get away from a ban

Seriously, the other guys get straight ban, and this kid doesnt?
I don't know... because this one is an actual question and not 12 year old fuckle shit?
PM a mod?

I dont know anymore, if I got a penny for every time a mod has said: "PM a mod about the problem", I'd be dead rich

Thats what the report button is for.

2007-12-15 11:34:03

#29

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6590|Winland

This thread is made of fail, and has bringed tons of other fail-filled threads here. BLASPHEMY, I SAY, BLASPHEMY!

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2007-12-15 11:40:05

#30

Funky_Finny: Banned; +456|6525|Carnoustie, Scotland

Freezer7Pro wrote:
This thread is made of fail, and has bringed tons of other fail-filled threads here. BLASPHEMY, I SAY, BLASPHEMY!

https://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e11/danibgoode/CaptObviousWaytoGO600.jpg

I got banned for 3 days for posting a Cpt. Obvious picture in D&ST...

2007-12-15 11:51:37

#31

naightknifar: Served and Out; +642|6954|Southampton, UK

Freezer7Pro wrote:
This thread is made of fail, and has bringed tons of other fail-filled threads here. BLASPHEMY, I SAY, BLASPHEMY!

Lol. My serious thread failed - but all the others (spam) were /win.

BF2s is confusing.

YAY ERS IS BANNED!!!

2007-12-15 14:16:44

#32

GR34: Member; +215|6938|ALBERTA> CANADA

WHO would win jesus or optomis prime?

2007-12-15 14:17:50

#33

Lieutenant_Jensen: Your cops are corrupt.; +200|6784|fåking denmark

GR34 wrote:
WHO would win jesus or optomis prime?

Optomis prime

jesus=fail

2007-12-15 14:20:50

#34

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6861

GR34 wrote:
WHO would win jesus or optomis prime?

Jesus, as he can just respawn in three days.

Dirty Harry or The Man With No Name?

2007-12-15 14:21:28

#35

Lieutenant_Jensen: Your cops are corrupt.; +200|6784|fåking denmark

DoctaStrangelove wrote:
GR34 wrote:
WHO would win jesus or optomis prime?
Jesus, as he can just respawn in three days.

Dirty Harry or The Man With No Name?

The Man With No Name

Me or Sam?

2007-12-15 14:21:47