I watched that!usmarine2005 wrote:
Green Street Hooligans was a bad enough image for you football nutjobs.
It wasn't bad.
I swear im the only person i know whos seen that.
15 more years! 15 more years!
I watched that!usmarine2005 wrote:
Green Street Hooligans was a bad enough image for you football nutjobs.
FIXXORED*usmarine2005 wrote:
cuz hugh grant fucked that hooker.
He was british. Fake accent, AND he was a comically bad villain.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
havent you seen the "fifth element"?Skorpy-chan wrote:
Because a refined british accent gives an element of class to an evil character.
A drawling texan as a bad guy would just get laughed at.
Yep. Shoot 'Em Up. Paul Giamatti was the bad guy and Clive Owen (one of my favorite actors) was the good guy. Children of Men as well.NantanCochise wrote:
Yes this is somewhat true but Clive Owen usually plays the good guy and so does Patrick Stewart, not to mention Roger Moore and Sean Connery, and Im not talking about thier bond movies. There are many others too.
lol probably but James Bond, hmm...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
historical accuracy maybe? hehe...
Oh my god, some of the accents in that film were shocking. The leader of 'the firm', who is actually English in real life, pulled off the worst representation of a London accent I have ever heard. It was like a fucked up cross between Australian / South African / English.usmarine2005 wrote:
Green Street Hooligans was a bad enough image for you football nutjobs.
James Bond is a fictional characteravman633 wrote:
lol probably but James Bond, hmm...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
historical accuracy maybe? hehe...
The whole James Bond series is set in Britian. At least that's where the "home office" is. So . . . fail.LaidBackNinja wrote:
James Bond.
[TUF]Catbox wrote:
I just read that movies aren't real... They get a bunch of actors and they pretend to be people in various roles... And after the movie is filmed the actors go back to being themselves... lol
Well that film was full of shit. Great to watch but about as historically accurate as U571. William Wallace was a sheep rustler, could'nt speak french and was about 7ft bloody tall.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
what about "Braveheart"
Last edited by The_Guardsman (2007-12-17 16:13:29)
Last edited by FloppY_ (2007-12-17 13:23:13)
Historical Accuracy and American Movies are like chalk and cheese.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
historical accuracy maybe? hehe...
Shame the "hero" in that was AustralianFloppY_ wrote:
I believe all of this "english = bad guy" dates back to the Red Coats
(think Mel Gibson in Patriot)
http://thecia.com.au/reviews/p/images/patriot-1.jpg
Stop making me feel bad... [/sarcasm]FloppY_ wrote:
James Bond is a fictional characteravman633 wrote:
lol probably but James Bond, hmm...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
historical accuracy maybe? hehe...
And look up, we've already been over 007
i eet bof, and look whar i am twoday, hurr.=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:
Historical Accuracy and American Movies are like chalk and cheese.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
historical accuracy maybe? hehe...
Unknown Researcher wrote:
As an Englishman born and bred I have to say that I'm quite fond of the American tendency to cast my countrymen as the villain of the piece. He might always fall foul of the hero and/or his own devious plots at the end of the film, but he always gets the best lines and brings an impeccable style to the dance that you just can't get with a US accent. Alan Rickman, Charles Dance, Jeremy Irons and many others always steal the scene away from the likes of Kevin Costner, Bruce Willis and Tom Hanks every time.
Fixed.=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:
Shame the "hero" in that was NaziFloppY_ wrote:
I believe all of this "english = bad guy" dates back to the Red Coats
(think Mel Gibson in Patriot)
http://thecia.com.au/reviews/p/images/patriot-1.jpg