Liberal-Sl@yer
Certified BF2S Asshole
+131|6893|The edge of sanity
The MPAA or the Motion Picture Association of America, is the organization that is leading the headlong charge against pircay and torrenting. The MPAA consist of Buena Vista Pictures Distribution (The Walt Disney Company), Sony Pictures, Paramount Pictures (Viacom—which bought Dream Works in February 2006), 20th Century Fox (News Corporation), Universal Studios (NBC Universal), and Warner Bros. (Time Warner). The MPAA is also one of the worlds largest monopolies in existence. The MPAA takes action against torrents and torrent servers to protect their profit, as all monopolies do, but are they taking their interest to far?
     The MPAA is acting as a global justice system against torrents and illegal file-sharing, which is out of their jurisdiction. In May of 2006 the MPAA pressured Swedish law enforcement to commit a raid, without basis for their allegations, against the servers that hosted torrent files on a popular torrent site, The Pirate Bay. The raid was found to be without basis and the servers were allowed to be brought back online two days later. However, the MPAA committed a successful raid against the Razorback2 server, which was one of the main servers for the peer-to-peer software, Edonkey. Even thought many raids have been committed the MPAA's efforts are futile at best because of the stable amount of torrenting and peer-to-peer activity.
     Hypocrisy is the mainstay for the Motion Picture Association of America. When the documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated was released in 2006 the MPAA was caught downloading the movie illegally, yet no charges were filed after they released a statement that the film was illegally downloaded and put into disc media form for several employees of the MPAA. Another incident was when the MPAA distributed a torrent detection system that was already licensed in 2007. No charges were filed but the MPAA did change the toolkit so that it was not under violation of the same copyright laws that it tries to uphold.
     Torrents are not just used for illegal file-sharing as the MPAA claims. These downloads have other purposes such as to serve as backups for information or entertainment that people have on their hard drives, which is the United States (the country in which the MPAA is based out off), is perfectly legal. Torrents also can be used for fast downloads of freeware such as the Forgotten Hope 2 modification for Battlefield 2.

MY THOUGHTS
     Personally, I believe the MPAA to be an inefficient monopoly that constantly oversteps its jurisdiction and promotes false claims of lost profits. This monopoly not only breaks the laws with its enforcement of raids, but also with its own hypocrisy against copyright information and piracy. I see the MPAA as an organization that needs to have its powers revoked and in need of enforcement of anti-trust laws that are in effect in the United States.

Sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA
http://www.mpaa.org/piracy_internet.asp
http://tech.monstersandcritics.com/news … ht_notices
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4743052.stm
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=71429

I would love to hear what you have to say about all this, so please do leave replies.
aimless
Member
+166|6562|Texas
I like torrents. As long as there is an internet connection available somewhere in the world, piracy will continue to be in existance.
sithao
Member
+63|7063|Los Angeles, California
Torrents ftw.
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|7267|Denver colorado
Yeah. I hate them too.

But because I don't really like causing trouble I mainly just DL mixes (you cant buy them) and Dl fansubs of anime to watch (legal)
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6979|Texas - Bigger than France
Unless then work has been determined to be a "public" work, I'm not sure how it will ever be legal to get something for nothing.

I am imagining Disney or Dreamworks owned by the government, and thinking about the quality of the output.

Kind of reminders me of that Vonnegutt book (also movie) Harrison something, where the government controls the arts.
Mitch
16 more years
+877|6962|South Florida

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

The MPAA or the Motion Picture Association of America, is the organization that is leading the headlong charge against pircay and torrenting. The MPAA consist of Buena Vista Pictures Distribution (The Walt Disney Company), Sony Pictures, Paramount Pictures (Viacom—which bought Dream Works in February 2006), 20th Century Fox (News Corporation), Universal Studios (NBC Universal), and Warner Bros. (Time Warner). The MPAA is also one of the worlds largest monopolies in existence. The MPAA takes action against torrents and torrent servers to protect their profit, as all monopolies do, but are they taking their interest to far?
     The MPAA is acting as a global justice system against torrents and illegal file-sharing, which is out of their jurisdiction. In May of 2006 the MPAA pressured Swedish law enforcement to commit a raid, without basis for their allegations, against the servers that hosted torrent files on a popular torrent site, The Pirate Bay. The raid was found to be without basis and the servers were allowed to be brought back online two days later. However, the MPAA committed a successful raid against the Razorback2 server, which was one of the main servers for the peer-to-peer software, Edonkey. Even thought many raids have been committed the MPAA's efforts are futile at best because of the stable amount of torrenting and peer-to-peer activity.
     Hypocrisy is the mainstay for the Motion Picture Association of America. When the documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated was released in 2006 the MPAA was caught downloading the movie illegally, yet no charges were filed after they released a statement that the film was illegally downloaded and put into disc media form for several employees of the MPAA. Another incident was when the MPAA distributed a torrent detection system that was already licensed in 2007. No charges were filed but the MPAA did change the toolkit so that it was not under violation of the same copyright laws that it tries to uphold.
     Torrents are not just used for illegal file-sharing as the MPAA claims. These downloads have other purposes such as to serve as backups for information or entertainment that people have on their hard drives, which is the United States (the country in which the MPAA is based out off), is perfectly legal. Torrents also can be used for fast downloads of freeware such as the Forgotten Hope 2 modification for Battlefield 2.

MY THOUGHTS
     Personally, I believe the MPAA to be an inefficient monopoly that constantly oversteps its jurisdiction and promotes false claims of lost profits. This monopoly not only breaks the laws with its enforcement of raids, but also with its own hypocrisy against copyright information and piracy. I see the MPAA as an organization that needs to have its powers revoked and in need of enforcement of anti-trust laws that are in effect in the United States.

Sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA
http://www.mpaa.org/piracy_internet.asp
http://tech.monstersandcritics.com/news … ht_notices
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4743052.stm
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=71429

I would love to hear what you have to say about all this, so please do leave replies.
I have some radical opinions about filesharing and internet privacy in general. While the MPAA has basically unlimited funds, and so much power, they feel they can go further then everyone else.

First of all, who are they to raid a server. Seriously, Isn't it none of there business whats on a server?

The bottom line is, they will never, ever, stop illegal sharing of video/audio. As long as theres Torrents, Rapidshare, megaupload, megashares,  filefactory, limewire, bearshare, warez communities, and so many more there will always be filesharing.

And pretty soon they will get away with something thats just not right.
pisses me off when people try to own the internet.
15 more years! 15 more years!
Liberal-Sl@yer
Certified BF2S Asshole
+131|6893|The edge of sanity

Pug wrote:

Unless then work has been determined to be a "public" work, I'm not sure how it will ever be legal to get something for nothing.

I am imagining Disney or Dreamworks owned by the government, and thinking about the quality of the output.

Kind of reminders me of that Vonnegutt book (also movie) Harrison something, where the government controls the arts.
That is not the issue presented. I am not speculating that downloading copyrighted information will ever be legal (which it will not). I am saying that the orginization (the MPAA) is an irresponsible burden on our society that has done more harm than good, while trampeling all over our justice system.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6842|North Carolina
It doesn't happen often, Mitch, but you and I agree 100% on this one.
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6979|Texas - Bigger than France

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

That is not the issue presented. I am not speculating that downloading copyrighted information will ever be legal (which it will not). I am saying that the orginization (the MPAA) is an irresponsible burden on our society that has done more harm than good, while trampeling all over our justice system.
Ahh sorry.

Okay, but I guess I'm not understanding where it's trampling.  There's got to be some sort of check and balance - for instance were there countersuits?  Were those who broke their own laws punished?  etc etc etc.

The FCC's got laws too about this kind of stuff too, but it's not 100% great either.  I guess I'm not too sure what alternatives are available, and with that being said, what else can be done besides the above?
Defiance
Member
+438|7108

The MPAA is drastically full of shit, not entirely but their gung ho nature in "bringing to justice" those evwil evwil file servers reminds me of Jack Thompson, and he's soon to get disbarred (supposedly). Let's hope the same happens to the MPAA.
ReTox
Member
+100|6936|State of RETOXification
Anyone who thinks that piracy can be stopped is deluding themselves.  The MAFIAAs likely spend more on tracking and prosecuting these people than they would have actually lost.  The funny thing is how they count losses.  If you download a movie they call that a lose, even if you would have never bought it anyway.  SO their numbers are totally screwed and the people they gripe to, the law makers, have no real understanding of how the technology works so they take a "Torrents are bad mmm kay!" approach.

Truth is, their business model can't handle the internet and they are so scared to lose their S Class they'll outright make shit up to try to save it.
Dragonclaw
Member
+186|6742|Florida
How are these people losing money anyway? More people buy movies/music than torrent them these days. They lose a small fraction of the profits and they go shit a gorilla over it.
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7280|Reykjavík, Iceland.
Recently torrent.is (the icelandic torrent site) was taken down, sad news for all Icelandic torrenters.

Demonoid has been down for ages now, too
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6987|CH/BR - in UK

They're losing money, they want it back. The record companies are even more desperate (especially pop labels) because they're now actually having to produce quality goods so the entire album will be bought.
I download movies I liked watching in the movie theaters... *shrugs*

-konfusion
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6905
Maybe if they made movies that didn't suck people wouldn't pirate them.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard