Airwolf
Latter Alcoholic
+287|7201|Scotland
And it was fucking awesome, seriously. That film is high ranked in my all time top films, really makes you think afterwards.


Acting was really great, made me feel a part of their torment and pain...




10/10    just, wow. Go see it now.
liquidat0r
wtf.
+2,223|7109|UK
I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
PspRpg-7
-
+961|7179

liquidat0r wrote:

I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
he r legund tho
Mitch
16 more years
+877|7007|South Florida
i do agree.
15 more years! 15 more years!
SamTheMan:D
Banned
+856|6456|England

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Did you cry when he had to kill his dog?
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,993|7113|949

liquidat0r wrote:

I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
Yeah, the book it is based on is the same name

I'm a Will Smith and Sci-Fi hater, so I really have no desire to see it.
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|7238|Scotland

The film was awful. It was a terrible copy of 28 Days Later; along with the worst ending I have ever seen.

It was hollywood spewl. Only Will Smith saved it from being utter fail. His mesmerising performance saved teh day for me. But never again will I watch that crap. The infected actually made me feel sorry for them, the reverse of what I was meant to feel : fear.
gameaddict
Member
+35|7162|let op drempels
I'm going to see it tomorrow, but i saw that it only last 100 mins does that affect the movie much?
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7202|California

Zimmer wrote:

The film was awful. It was a terrible copy of 28 Days Later; along with the worst ending I have ever seen.

It was hollywood spewl. Only Will Smith saved it from being utter fail. His mesmerising performance saved teh day for me. But never again will I watch that crap. The infected actually made me feel sorry for them, the reverse of what I was meant to feel : fear.
lawl.

28 days later was just a good copy of I Am Legend

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Legend

1954 > *
Zilla
Killa of threads
+122|7123|7th level of hell

great movie. reminded me of Castaway. (the part where he was losing his mind from being alone, not the infected, or the beingstuckonaisland part.)
Airwolf
Latter Alcoholic
+287|7201|Scotland

Zimmer wrote:

The film was awful. It was a terrible copy of 28 Days Later; along with the worst ending I have ever seen.

It was hollywood spewl. Only Will Smith saved it from being utter fail. His mesmerising performance saved teh day for me. But never again will I watch that crap. The infected actually made me feel sorry for them, the reverse of what I was meant to feel : fear.
that was the point of the film surely? It's meant to portray the way we behave when put under enormous strain and isolation




gameaddict wrote:

I'm going to see it tomorrow, but i saw that it only last 100 mins does that affect the movie much?
exactly what I thought. Nah man, there's a lot crammed in there. Pretty intense

Last edited by Airwolf (2007-12-27 15:40:30)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7103|London, England
Best film I've seen this year. It's more of a thinking mans film rather than your action type (like 28 days was)

Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2007-12-27 15:34:36)

Aries_37
arrivederci frog
+368|7057|London
LOL if you think its similar to 28 days later watch 28 weeks later, sooo many similar plotlines. I watched both in the same day and had some serious deja vu.
paranoid101
Ambitious but Rubbish
+540|7221
I enjoyed the film apart for the stupid looking CGI monsters/Infected, I mean the infected in 28 Days Later scary, the Vampires in 30 Days of night creepy looking.

The Infected in I am Legend well rubbish, almost ruined the film for me, luckily the shots of the empty New York, story and the flashbacks were enough to keep me interested and enjoy it.

A good film not a great film
voodoodolphins
Member
+92|7184
I was very disappointed when i saw it....thin storyline, avg. acting and a stupid ending.... Will smith is the same as always, nothing new there...he may have gained in muscle mass though. and wtf is he supposed to be? an army man or a molecular biologist???? or both???

Edit: this does not mean I dont like Will smith...I loved him in The pursuit of happyness and he is kinda cool in I robot (same type of acting though as in I am legend)

And yes it was to short, they could easily have made it 20-30 (or more) min's longer thus giving the character more time to evolve in and maybe some more background.

All in all i Think this movie is an avg. movie.

Last edited by voodoodolphins (2007-12-27 15:43:51)

Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7149

You guys really need to read the book, or at least the graphic novel.  At least the ending to get the title.
Mitch
16 more years
+877|7007|South Florida

SamTheMan:D wrote:

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Did you cry when he had to kill his dog?
i almost almost cried.
15 more years! 15 more years!
Brasso
member
+1,549|7112

It was okay.  It wasn't as great as I thought it would be but a good movie nonetheless.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
voodoodolphins
Member
+92|7184

Ilocano wrote:

You guys really need to read the book, or at least the graphic novel.  At least the ending to get the title.
Yeah that would of course help...Great novel btw.
Jepeto87
Member
+38|7167|Dublin
I heard the ending in the book is much better but am looking forward to see it!
Switch
Knee Deep In Clunge
+489|6945|Tyne & Wear, England

liquidat0r wrote:

I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
It sounds as if some internet goon named the film.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7103|London, England

KILLSWITCH wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

I just wish they'd called it something different. Such a rubbish name for such a good film.
It sounds as if some internet goon named the film.
Where have I seen "this am internets" before...
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7149

voodoodolphins wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

You guys really need to read the book, or at least the graphic novel.  At least the ending to get the title.
Yeah that would of course help...Great novel btw.
The way the book ends is typical of that period though.  Like how many Twilight Zone episodes ended...
Volatile
Member
+252|7186|Sextupling in Empire

Good not great. Will Smith actually acted in this film, and his daily routines and interaction with his dog were entertaining. But.....the horrible CGI nearly ruined it all, and the abilities the infected had were ridiculous.

Oh, and that C4 grenade he used in the end was interesting.
NantanCochise
Member
+55|6460|Portugal/United States

Zimmer wrote:

The film was awful. It was a terrible copy of 28 Days Later; along with the worst ending I have ever seen.

It was hollywood spewl. Only Will Smith saved it from being utter fail. His mesmerising performance saved teh day for me. But never again will I watch that crap. The infected actually made me feel sorry for them, the reverse of what I was meant to feel : fear.
A copy of 28days later!!!!! Are you mad, It was completely different. The only thing in common was that it was another zombie flick. You might as well of said it was a copy of night of the living dead, or dawn of the dead, or land of the dead. Never-the-less I liked it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard