Good or not?

2007-12-28 23:55:32

#1

Andoura: Got loooollllll ?; +853|7117|Montreal, Qc, Canada

What does this card worth?: ati radeon x1650 se 512mb

I really dont know nothing about ATI, im more NVIDIA. I Just got this card. Is it a good card? Also compared to a 7600GT wich one is the best.

Thx for the help

2007-12-29 00:04:03

#2

Stubbee: Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts; +223|7221|Reality

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php … ;card2=385

assuming ta carte is a regular 1650
PRO is comparable
XT is better

The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'

2007-12-29 09:17:03

#3

Computer_Guy: Member; +54|7175

ATI delivers picture while nVidia will deliver performance.

2007-12-29 09:19:42

#4

ceslayer23: IN YOUR MIRROR; +142|6839|CLOSER THAN I APPEAR

Computer_Guy wrote:
ATI delivers picture while nVidia will deliver performance.

uhh what

2007-12-29 09:22:12

#5

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|7059|SE London

It's not as good as a 7600GT.

Computer_Guy wrote:
ATI delivers picture while nVidia will deliver performance.

Not true at all. Back then ATI had better (top end) performance and picture quality (the lack of combined AA and HDR support by nVidia was a big let down), now the opposite is true and to a greater extent.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-12-29 09:23:08)

2007-12-29 09:53:45

#6

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6931|The Twilight Zone

i know that 7600gt is better than x1600pro but dunno about 1650. but as far as i know 1650se is even less power-full than the ordinary 1650

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2007-12-29 10:30:06

#7

DrunkenPirate: Rum Baron; +44|7171|Norfolk, England

se = sucky edition

pro or xt is what you want.

2007-12-29 10:56:32

#8

basetballjones: Member; +30|7226

Bertster7 wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
ATI delivers picture while nVidia will deliver performance.
Not true at all. Back then ATI had better (top end) performance and picture quality (the lack of combined AA and HDR support by nVidia was a big let down), now the opposite is true and to a greater extent.

We're talking about x1650 and comparing to 7600's

You are correct in your statement, but that was years ago. Nvidia has been whooping the shit out of ATI in gaming since 2000.

2007-12-29 12:08:59

#9

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6675|Winland

basetballjones wrote:
Bertster7 wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
ATI delivers picture while nVidia will deliver performance.
Not true at all. Back then ATI had better (top end) performance and picture quality (the lack of combined AA and HDR support by nVidia was a big let down), now the opposite is true and to a greater extent.
We're talking about x1650 and comparing to 7600's

You are correct in your statement, but that was years ago. Nvidia has been whooping the shit out of ATI in gaming since 2000.

Yep. Except from the 1900/7900 series, where ATi completely shag nVidia.

Anyhow, the X600/X1600 cards suck major ass, huge failures. They're priced equally or higher than 7600's, but they're hotter and perform worse.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2007-12-29 12:34:34

#10

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|7059|SE London

Freezer7Pro wrote:
basetballjones wrote:
Bertster7 wrote:
Not true at all. Back then ATI had better (top end) performance and picture quality (the lack of combined AA and HDR support by nVidia was a big let down), now the opposite is true and to a greater extent.
We're talking about x1650 and comparing to 7600's

You are correct in your statement, but that was years ago. Nvidia has been whooping the shit out of ATI in gaming since 2000.
Yep. Except from the 1900/7900 series, where ATi completely shag nVidia.

Anyhow, the X600/X1600 cards suck major ass, huge failures. They're priced equally or higher than 7600's, but they're hotter and perform worse.

Which is the series I was talking about. The top end of the previous series of cards.

And what about the FX series cards? Mmmmm? Great cards they were compared to ATIs, weren't they?
Whooping the shit out of nVidia since 2000 = bullshit.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-12-29 12:35:28)

BF2S Forums Good or not?

Computer_Guy wrote:

Computer_Guy wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Computer_Guy wrote:

basetballjones wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Computer_Guy wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

basetballjones wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Board footer