At 00:19.
I have no idea how you could do that in BF2, but it'd be a nice maneuver to have up your sleeve.
At 00:19.
I have no idea how you could do that in BF2, but it'd be a nice maneuver to have up your sleeve.
what just doing a 360?
i'm pretty sure thats just how barrel rolls work IRL.
No, doing an aileron roll while losing altitude that quickly.RandomSchl wrote:
what just doing a 360?
Not with BF2 physics.
And that is how barrel rolls work. He doesn't gain lift flying upside down as well as right side up, so he falls. BF2 doesn't feature such realism.
And that is how barrel rolls work. He doesn't gain lift flying upside down as well as right side up, so he falls. BF2 doesn't feature such realism.
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-01-05 23:00:50)
Ahh..makes sense.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not with BF2 physics.
And that is how barrel rolls work. He doesn't gain lift flying upside down as well as right side up, so he falls. BF2 doesn't feature such realism.
Exactly, never mind the fact that the J-10 is better than the F-35 in BF2. In real life the J-10 is a peice of crap and a whole squadron would get wiped out by a pair of F-35's before the J-10's would even know that they were being targeted.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not with BF2 physics.
And that is how barrel rolls work. He doesn't gain lift flying upside down as well as right side up, so he falls. BF2 doesn't feature such realism.
F-22 > F-35 > J-10NantanCochise wrote:
Exactly, never mind the fact that the J-10 is better than the F-35 in BF2. In real life the J-10 is a peice of crap and a whole squadron would get wiped out by a pair of F-35's before the J-10's would even know that they were being targeted.nukchebi0 wrote:
Not with BF2 physics.
And that is how barrel rolls work. He doesn't gain lift flying upside down as well as right side up, so he falls. BF2 doesn't feature such realism.
F-22>>F35>^n J-10 in real life.
The J-10 has about the same radar signature as an F-4II, which isn't very good.
The J-10 has about the same radar signature as an F-4II, which isn't very good.
You been doing some research, good on you. +1 K, and yeah the big daddy is the F-22.nukchebi0 wrote:
F-22>>F35>^n J-10 in real life.
The J-10 has about the same radar signature as an F-4II, which isn't very good.
Raptor... would be cool to have this in BF2...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GW2Hvu_m … re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GW2Hvu_m … re=related
Love is the answer
They would have to make it unrealistically bad, or the US would never lose.
Also, the USAF is the sole operator of F-22s, and you play as the USMC in the game.
Also, the USAF is the sole operator of F-22s, and you play as the USMC in the game.
If you want to see some really cool stuff, look up some of the jets that have vectored thrust. They can do all kinds of crazy moves. No idea if it's actually useful in combat, but it's entertaining
Sukhois are the best for aerobatics
Last edited by Adams_BJ (2008-01-06 02:49:39)
You mean some of the best in aerobatics, I suggest you take a look at the X-31, small, forward cannards and thrust vectoring making it a lot more useful in air to air combat than the generic cobra moves of the Su-27 and 35.Adams_BJ wrote:
Sukhois are the best for aerobatics
The F-22 has vectored thrust, and can do a Pugachev's Cobra.
The F-22 can hold a Pugachev Cobra for over three times the amount of time than an Su-27/35 and the X-31 even longer.nukchebi0 wrote:
The F-22 has vectored thrust, and can do a Pugachev's Cobra.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GW2Hvu_mUdU
Last edited by NantanCochise (2008-01-06 16:44:19)
The F22 Raptor is top dog concerning maneuverability, but still: the AC130U is absolute pwng when it comes to style and attitude.
Lol, screw mavericks when you can continuously pound the ground with 105 and 40mm fire for hours on end.Bernadictus wrote:
The F22 Raptor is top dog concerning maneuverability, but still: the AC130U is absolute pwng when it comes to style and attitude.
The Su-47 was far superior to the X-31. Forward-swept wings FTW, even IF you can't break mach 2 without tearing them off.NantanCochise wrote:
You mean some of the best in aerobatics, I suggest you take a look at the X-31, small, forward cannards and thrust vectoring making it a lot more useful in air to air combat than the generic cobra moves of the Su-27 and 35.Adams_BJ wrote:
Sukhois are the best for aerobatics
If you get a chance, check out an air show near you with the F22... They brought one to the AFB where I live this summer and it was absolutely incredible... The F18 was bad ass enough then they demo'd the F22 and people went nuts. Just insane. I had a friend that worked as an engineer on the avionics and she said it was the most amazing aircraft she's ever seen. So apparently in impresses the engineers too.
uhmm that was nothing special
WRONG!!! You sir, obviously dont understand aerobatics, aerodynamics or aviation for that matter. Firstly the X-31 also has forward-swept wings AND thrust vectoring. The X-31 can perform a 24-degree angle of attack landing, a Post Stall Loop with double reversal and the "Mongoose Maneuver", the only aircraft on the planet able to do this. Dont believe me, watch this...Skorpy-chan wrote:
The Su-47 was far superior to the X-31. Forward-swept wings FTW, even IF you can't break mach 2 without tearing them off.NantanCochise wrote:
You mean some of the best in aerobatics, I suggest you take a look at the X-31, small, forward cannards and thrust vectoring making it a lot more useful in air to air combat than the generic cobra moves of the Su-27 and 35.Adams_BJ wrote:
Sukhois are the best for aerobatics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLfAY8yccQ4
or this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCELX-NgqFQ
or this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJ7irwaw … re=related