Write a logical chain of conditonals by using steps that solve an algebraic equation.
I have no clue what the hell that means. +1 to whoever helps
I have no clue what the hell that means. +1 to whoever helps
42.
lol, that doesn't sound like geometry at all.Docjones wrote:
Write a logical chain of conditonals by using steps that solve an algebraic equation.
I have no clue what the hell that means. +1 to whoever helps
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
Jesus christ so you get that shit too? I fucking want to kill babies when I get those. You have to go through the steps giving a defenition/postulate/theorem as a reason for each one. Pain in the fucking ass so I dont bother.
QFTDragonclaw wrote:
Jesus christ so you get that shit too? I fucking want to kill babies when I get those. You have to go through the steps giving a defenition/postulate/theorem as a reason for each one. Pain in the fucking ass so I dont bother.
It means that you show algebraically every step you do, and beside that step you justify why you can do that with a definition, postulate, or theorem. We did them in T charts with picture if applicable.
We have superscripts, you know. They're much cooler than the lame ass ^ symbolig wrote:
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
watDesertFox- wrote:
We have superscripts, you know. They're much cooler than the lame ass ^ symbolig wrote:
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
pi is exactly 3.
Isn't it something like: Exponents ---> Multiplication/Division (Order Depending) ---> Addition/Subtraction (Order Depending)..
So like 2/(2) - 4 + 2^(2) = 1
So like 2/(2) - 4 + 2^(2) = 1
Last edited by ReDevilJR (2008-01-06 17:04:44)
Another question
Explain why c must be unequal to 0 in order to apply the Division property of equality but c may be 0 when you apply the Multiplication Property of Equality.
Again, +1 for help
Explain why c must be unequal to 0 in order to apply the Division property of equality but c may be 0 when you apply the Multiplication Property of Equality.
Again, +1 for help
Last edited by Docjones (2008-01-06 17:55:07)
BLASPHEMY!Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
pi is exactly 3.
The Kansas State Legislature is more powerful than you. Please do not argue with the law.belldawg wrote:
BLASPHEMY!Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
pi is exactly 3.
If you divide by zero, the universe collapses.Docjones wrote:
Another question
Explain why c must be unequal to 0 in order to apply the Division property of equality but c may be 0 when you apply the Multiplication Property of Equality.
Again, +1 for help
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
This doesn't sound like geometry.
proofs are taught in geometrynukchebi0 wrote:
This doesn't sound like geometry.
Describe some real life relationships that satisfy some, but not all, of the Reflexive Property, Symmetric Property, and Transitive Property.
Damn I hate geometry
Damn I hate geometry
Last edited by Docjones (2008-01-06 19:03:53)
Wut @ Every post
[TRANSFORMER NOISE]ig wrote:
wat
a2 + b2 = c2
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
does it give you a specific equation, or do you have to write a general outline?
If it's a general outline, remember that parentheticals > exponentials > Multiplication/division > addition/subtraction, and that the different steps are solved in that order, from left to right.
If you need to throw in geometric theorems and angle formulas, i cant help you much there, as there are probably an infinite number of possibilites that can be solved in any order...
If it's a general outline, remember that parentheticals > exponentials > Multiplication/division > addition/subtraction, and that the different steps are solved in that order, from left to right.
If you need to throw in geometric theorems and angle formulas, i cant help you much there, as there are probably an infinite number of possibilites that can be solved in any order...
I never had to do anything near this. We proved congruency, not theorems.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
proofs are taught in geometrynukchebi0 wrote:
This doesn't sound like geometry.
Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-01-06 21:29:19)
geometry is the gayest form of math known to mankind and different teachers skip different shit because they hate it so much.nukchebi0 wrote:
I never had to do anything near this. We proved congruency, not theorems.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
proofs are taught in geometrynukchebi0 wrote:
This doesn't sound like geometry.
i learned geometry in college before i went to high school so didn't have to do this stupid crap
intelligence ftw
geometry is finding the averages of different things so that when it comes down to finding points in trig given a small amount of information, you can do so
geometry exists solely as a precursor to trig tbh
intelligence ftw
geometry is finding the averages of different things so that when it comes down to finding points in trig given a small amount of information, you can do so
geometry exists solely as a precursor to trig tbh
I know.Blehm98 wrote:
geometry exists solely as a precursor to trig tbh
I think you meant arrogance ftw.intelligence ftw