congrats man!
without btw
without btw
ƒ³
a condom | 15% | 15% - 22 | ||||
without a condom | 46% | 46% - 64 | ||||
I never had sex! | 38% | 38% - 53 | ||||
Total: 139 |
QFMFTRoger Lesboules wrote:
Witout is way better, no doubt, but until you know she is on birth control and STD free, just wrap your weenie.
lol AIDS.DonFck wrote:
Random one-nighter - Definitely with. There's absolutely no point in risking getting STD:s and/or the partner pregnant. Quite frankly, it's not only stupid, but I'm guessing that most of you wouldn't have the balls of a) go in for testing nor b) call the other party involved later, that you have aquired an STD.
So you're wondering why they keep spreading? Because of people who don't f*cking use condoms.
Usually people learn after they got something (and gotten rid of it), but then there are the dumbasses who just keep on pushing their luck and end up being spreaders of one or several diseases, only because of their own carelessness.
Now, in a monogamous relationship, and if the other involved party is a) on the pill or b) you are trying for a baby, then without. It just is that much better.
Never believe the one you're about to have sex with, if they claim that they've "been tested, and cleared", and never use your own negative results as an argument to go without a rubber. It's just careless.
I'm getting sick of people saying AIDS, as if it were a joke. And if some of you (luckily just some) actually act the way that you claim, then you'll find out soon enough. Seems that most of you know that you need to wrap it up tight.
no uig wrote:
stay safe. strap it up.
Same, at least we have the balls to admit...SamTheMan:D wrote:
Unfortuantly Sam's cherry is still intact, waiting to be popped
Last edited by ShowMeTheMonkey (2008-01-11 08:20:09)
loollll no... I just had sex like 3 times in a row yesterday with my gf and all of them was without. It was good, so I thought about asking people around here.geNius wrote:
First time?