Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA
Did Fox edit a question answer from Ron Paul?

I believe they did since I watched it online and recorded it on dvr due to girlfriend watching tv.  And it happened online but not on tv when I watched it again after reading this below .

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=1127

Is Fox credible anymore?
Interesting for him being a fringe candidate that they would do that.

Opinions?

Last edited by Mason4Assassin444 (2008-01-11 18:33:03)

oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6954|Πάϊ
Was Fox ever credible?


I liked his answer btw
ƒ³
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA
I thought it was a pretty good answer to a smart ass question.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7084

I rather enjoyed that. A good answer.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA
Wow. I figured Americans would show more interest. Oh well.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|7003|Mountains of NC

https://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j74/millerman888/fox_news.jpg

Fair and Balanced ......... Fair .. and .. Balanced


They report you decide
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
mikeyb118
Evil Overlord
+76|7033|S.C.
O'Reilly is always fowl, yet I still watch . Maybe I like to be an "outraged liberal".
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA

SEREMAKER wrote:

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j74/m … x_news.jpg

Fair and Balanced ......... Fair .. and .. Balanced


They report you decide
With a blatant edit of 1 candidates answers I guess they already decided for me.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7192|Argentina
Wow, I guess they edited that answer coz it was an excellent one.  I mean, that guy speaks the truth, and it appears to be very dangerous for the Fox agenda.  They need another prick in the office like GWB.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6903

SEREMAKER wrote:

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j74/m … x_news.jpg

Fair and Balanced ......... Fair .. and .. Balanced


They report you decide
I decide? Wow omfg that means that I have the power!!!!!!!!!
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA
Ron Paul won the text poll too. Hannity said it was spammed. Even though I could only send one vote. (I had to check)
CloakedStarship
Member
+76|7000
Hannity hates Paul.  I remember after one of the Republican debates, he sat down with Ron Paul and has a small interview.  They had a "heated" discussion in which Hannity accused Ron Paul of insinuating that 911 was our fault.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7051|do not disturb

He totally laid the smack down during the debate.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6880|The Land of Scott Walker

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Ron Paul won the text poll too. Hannity said it was spammed. Even though I could only send one vote. (I had to check)
The fact that Ron Paul can't even come close to winning a primary would seem to indicate the polls are spammed.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7051|do not disturb

Stingray24 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Ron Paul won the text poll too. Hannity said it was spammed. Even though I could only send one vote. (I had to check)
The fact that Ron Paul can't even come close to winning a primary would seem to indicate the polls are spammed.
He got 10% in Iowa and 7% (I think) in NH, just a little behind Rudi Giuliani

How did they spam though? You can't vote on the same cell phone twice.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA

CloakedStarship wrote:

Hannity hates Paul.  I remember after one of the Republican debates, he sat down with Ron Paul and has a small interview.  They had a "heated" discussion in which Hannity accused Ron Paul of insinuating that 911 was our fault.
He never said that about 9-11. He rejected it. And this debate Ron paul refused to do the little interview at the end. Can't blame him, he has been shit on twice by that twerp.  I'd like to shit in hannity's mouth.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA

Phrozenbot wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Ron Paul won the text poll too. Hannity said it was spammed. Even though I could only send one vote. (I had to check)
The fact that Ron Paul can't even come close to winning a primary would seem to indicate the polls are spammed.
He got 10% in Iowa and 7% (I think) in NH, just a little behind Rudi Giuliani
QFT. He had more right being there than Rudy if thats how we're measuring things.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7051|do not disturb

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:


The fact that Ron Paul can't even come close to winning a primary would seem to indicate the polls are spammed.
He got 10% in Iowa and 7% (I think) in NH, just a little behind Rudi Giuliani
QFT. He had more right being there than Rudy if thats how we're measuring things.
Absolutely, and he sheds light on a lot of issues at the debates that the other candidates are either ignorant of or don't care. He makes points I think people need to hear.

ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7084

Phrozenbot wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Ron Paul won the text poll too. Hannity said it was spammed. Even though I could only send one vote. (I had to check)
The fact that Ron Paul can't even come close to winning a primary would seem to indicate the polls are spammed.
He got 10% in Iowa and 7% (I think) in NH, just a little behind Rudi Giuliani

How did they spam though? You can't vote on the same cell phone twice.
You can send texts from a computer, and it's easy enough to change an IP.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7051|do not disturb

Yea but anyone can do that for their favorite candidate, not just for Ron Paul.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6990
It's a pity Ron Paul's domestic policy is a little far-fetched because his foreign policy is bang on.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7084

Phrozenbot wrote:

Yea but anyone can do that for their favorite candidate, not just for Ron Paul.
Ron Paul's has a huge internet based following, a lot of whom will be reasonably computer competent enough to do something like this. Most 60 year olds voting for Guiliani will not know how to do this.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7051|do not disturb

ghettoperson wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

Yea but anyone can do that for their favorite candidate, not just for Ron Paul.
Ron Paul's has a huge internet based following, a lot of whom will be reasonably computer competent enough to do something like this. Most 60 year olds voting for Guiliani will not know how to do this.

Phrozenbot wrote:

He got 10% in Iowa and 7% (I think) in NH, just a little behind Rudi Giuliani
Maybe not major but not insignificant. Time will tell.
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7097|USA

ghettoperson wrote:

Phrozenbot wrote:

Yea but anyone can do that for their favorite candidate, not just for Ron Paul.
Ron Paul's has a huge internet based following, a lot of whom will be reasonably computer competent enough to do something like this. Most 60 year olds voting for Guiliani will not know how to do this.
Great point.

I'd figure the % be higher if it were rigged though.

Last edited by Mason4Assassin444 (2008-01-12 17:39:54)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard