Skulltrail + 8800GTX SLi tested...

2008-02-04 14:18:08

#26

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6772|N. Ireland

max wrote:
19155 with dual QX9775 @ 4GHz and 8800GTX (stockl) SLI'ed

That's...disappointing actually. EVGA are already past 30k.

2008-02-04 14:19:01

#27

Microwave: _; +515|6934|Loughborough Uni / Leeds, UK

kylef wrote:
max wrote:
19155 with dual QX9775 @ 4GHz and 8800GTX (stockl) SLI'ed
That's...disappointing actually. EVGA are already past 30k.

With liquid nitrogen!

2008-02-04 14:23:02

#28

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6693|Finland

james@alienware wrote:
kylef wrote:
max wrote:
19155 with dual QX9775 @ 4GHz and 8800GTX (stockl) SLI'ed
That's...disappointing actually. EVGA are already past 30k.
With liquid nitrogen!

yeah.... those scores are very disappointing tbh because I know quite many ppl with much much less expensive hardware and they score 18-20k.....

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-04 14:53:51

#29

CrazeD: Member; +368|6952|Maine

Having 8 cores won't really help your 3dmark, lol. As long as the CPU doesn't bottleneck the video card, it's really dependent on the video card to make your scores.

But I do agree, pretty low score tbh.

2008-02-05 01:12:35

#30

xRBLx: I've got lovely bunch of coconuts!!; +27|6634|England - Kent

CrazeD wrote:
Having 8 cores won't really help your 3dmark, lol. As long as the CPU doesn't bottleneck the video card, it's really dependent on the video card to make your scores.

But I do agree, pretty low score tbh.

Would 3D mark even pick up on the second? Im sure it would.

If I was making a new build again I dont think I wouls bother im still very happy with what i have.

2008-02-05 01:24:45