Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (17 years ago)
It's not really that big of a deal.
Oh like anyones going to see the card when it's inside your PC.
Like the perfectly accurate 8800GT review they wrote a week before its release date?Ender2309 wrote:
i'm calling bullshit. the chinese faked this kind of shit before.
better?aimless wrote:
How does it compare to the 88XX series?
nope. It is better than 8600 series (this card replaces 8600GTS) but is quite a lot slower than 8800GT/G92GTS/GTX/Ultra....Reciprocity wrote:
better?aimless wrote:
How does it compare to the 88XX series?
Actually it ought to compete with the 8800GS (that's barely available anyway). Its specification alone shows that the 9600GT will be a lot better than the 8600GTS. It might also well be a competitor to the HD3850 - price- and performance-wise.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
nope. It is better than 8600 series (this card replaces 8600GTS) but is quite a lot slower than 8800GT/G92GTS/GTX/Ultra....Reciprocity wrote:
better?aimless wrote:
How does it compare to the 88XX series?
Last edited by kylef (17 years ago)
It replaces both 8800 GS and 8600 GTS models... looks like a good competitor at HD 3850 price...Stormscythe wrote:
Actually it ought to compete with the 8800GS (that's barely available anyway). Its specification alone shows that the 9600GT will be a lot better than the 8600GTS. It might also well be a competitor to the HD3850 - price- and performance-wise.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
nope. It is better than 8600 series (this card replaces 8600GTS) but is quite a lot slower than 8800GT/G92GTS/GTX/Ultra....Reciprocity wrote:
better?
Isnt it just an 8800GS anyway, am sure I read that somewhere (with different clocks).GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
It replaces both 8800 GS and 8600 GTS models... looks like a good competitor at HD 3850 price...Stormscythe wrote:
Actually it ought to compete with the 8800GS (that's barely available anyway). Its specification alone shows that the 9600GT will be a lot better than the 8600GTS. It might also well be a competitor to the HD3850 - price- and performance-wise.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
nope. It is better than 8600 series (this card replaces 8600GTS) but is quite a lot slower than 8800GT/G92GTS/GTX/Ultra....
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (17 years ago)
That proves it is a fake...code-named G94's GeForce 9600GT
negative, it's got a 256 bit memory interface (192bit on the 8800GS) but fewer shader units.Bell wrote:
Isnt it just an 8800GS anyway, am sure I read that somewhere (with different clocks).
Martyn
no... they are still G9x chips....FloppY_ wrote:
That proves it is a fake...code-named G94's GeForce 9600GT
Nvidia is changing their chip name-setup with the 9xxx series...
yep it should be called g92.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
no... they are still G9x chips....FloppY_ wrote:
That proves it is a fake...code-named G94's GeForce 9600GT
Nvidia is changing their chip name-setup with the 9xxx series...
No, they will call them G9E or something,, at least as far as I know....Sup wrote:
yep it should be called g92.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
no... they are still G9x chips....FloppY_ wrote:
That proves it is a fake...
Nvidia is changing their chip name-setup with the 9xxx series...
The chip is called g92 the graphics card itself however will probably be called 9600gt/s, 9800gt/s, etc...FloppY_ wrote:
No, they will call them G9E or something,, at least as far as I know....Sup wrote:
yep it should be called g92.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
no... they are still G9x chips....
I am referring to the chip.Sup wrote:
The chip is called g92 the graphics card itself however will probably be called 9600gt/s, 9800gt/s, etc...FloppY_ wrote:
No, they will call them G9E or something,, at least as far as I know....Sup wrote:
yep it should be called g92.
