Appeasement like refusing to acknowledge that the Armenian genocide was a genocide in case some Muslims get upset? Appeasment US style.usmarine wrote:
It affects trade and stuff like that. As for health care, well I dunno.CameronPoe wrote:
Yeah - US taxation really affects me and everyone else non-American... not to mention the healthcare system...pffft.usmarine wrote:
It all affects the outside world....
However, when it comes to radical muslims and seeing countries and people want to appease them, it is my concern thank you.
Ok? What does that have to do with this story?PureFodder wrote:
Appeasement like refusing to acknowledge that the Armenian genocide was a genocide in case some Muslims get upset? Appeasment US style.
Why not sleep?ATG wrote:
Then why type?David.P wrote:
*sigh* I'm too tired today.
I believe that it is likely they are trying to do this. The fact is, we and the U.K. are at war with Islamist ( not Islam ). Until such a time comes when we are not they should not be allowed in sensitive posts, including technology, law enforcement and/or science.
But I also believe that our governments need only float a story like this every few weeks to continue to justify the hundreds of billions we spend every few weeks.
I also think they are doing this, and, the worst thing is, no-one can be sure who is telling the truth.
Since the usual endless unfounded rants about Europe appeasing Muslims are cycling again, it's worth pointing out that however much you want to criticize whatever's going on in Europe, your country's in there doing it too. In fact, the US is denying genocide, that's far worse.usmarine wrote:
Ok? What does that have to do with this story?PureFodder wrote:
Appeasement like refusing to acknowledge that the Armenian genocide was a genocide in case some Muslims get upset? Appeasment US style.
As for the story, it's already been capably been shown to be a load of shit.
Ya ok....go pay for a subscription to Janes. That story is very true.....just put together terribly.PureFodder wrote:
As for the story, it's already been capably been shown to be a load of shit.
Jane's has no mention of it on their open-public page. News sources around the world subscribe to Jane's but the Daily Mail got the inside scoop with the British Government's blessing and was the only one to pick up on Jane's analysis? Sorry, you are grasping at straws. Since you infer you have a subscription to Jane's, why don't you post a screengrab, link, or some text of Jane's analysis?usmarine wrote:
Ya ok....go pay for a subscription to Janes. That story is very true.....just put together terribly.PureFodder wrote:
As for the story, it's already been capably been shown to be a load of shit.
The story (as presented) is bullshit.
No shit is is not in the free area. A link won't do you any good with out a username and password. And no, I will not cut and paste. Pay for it if you want to see it. Believe it or don't for all I care.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Since you infer you have a subscription to Jane's, why don't you post a screengrab, link, or some text of Jane's analysis?
The story (as presented) is bullshit.
lo. Cut and paste. So difficult.usmarine wrote:
No shit is is not in the free area. A link won't do you any good with out a username and password. And no, I will not cut and paste. Pay for it if you want to see it. Believe it or don't for all I care.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Since you infer you have a subscription to Jane's, why don't you post a screengrab, link, or some text of Jane's analysis?
The story (as presented) is bullshit.
I never said it was difficult did I? I said you want to see it...pay for it then.CameronPoe wrote:
lo. Cut and paste. So difficult.usmarine wrote:
No shit is is not in the free area. A link won't do you any good with out a username and password. And no, I will not cut and paste. Pay for it if you want to see it. Believe it or don't for all I care.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Since you infer you have a subscription to Jane's, why don't you post a screengrab, link, or some text of Jane's analysis?
The story (as presented) is bullshit.
Or just stick to the BBC if that makes you happy.
Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-12 12:30:19)
For some reason I am calling bullshit - that you found info. Maybe it is your lack of comprehension and diction on this site, but I doubt you troll Jane's for informative intelligence analysis.usmarine wrote:
I never said it was difficult did I? I said you want to see it...pay for it then.CameronPoe wrote:
lo. Cut and paste. So difficult.usmarine wrote:
No shit is is not in the free area. A link won't do you any good with out a username and password. And no, I will not cut and paste. Pay for it if you want to see it. Believe it or don't for all I care.
Or just stick to the BBC if that makes you happy.
But whatever - Daily Mail is shit, so I cannot trust an intentionally ambiguous tabloid story. Sorry.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-02-12 12:41:25)
Once the remote email server comes back up, I will show that I am a member and do have a subscription.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
For some reason I am calling bullshit - that you found info. Maybe it is your lack of comprehension and diction on this site, but I doubt you troll Jane's for informative intelligence analysis.
Dictation? You condescending little fuck. I read Janes everyday.
Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-12 12:41:17)
You could prove your point in a fraction of a minute if you wanted to. It could be the first decent point you've ever made, who knows!usmarine wrote:
I never said it was difficult did I? I said you want to see it...pay for it then.
Or just stick to the BBC if that makes you happy.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-12 12:41:41)
Keep being a dick.CameronPoe wrote:
You could prove your point in a fraction of a minute if you wanted to. It could be the first decent point you've ever made, who knows!usmarine wrote:
I never said it was difficult did I? I said you want to see it...pay for it then.
Or just stick to the BBC if that makes you happy.
lol. You do know what DICTION as opposed to DICTATION is? Way to prove Ken right!usmarine wrote:
Once the remote email server comes back up, I will show that I am a member and do have a subscription.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
For some reason I am calling bullshit - that you found info. Maybe it is your lack of comprehension and diction on this site, but I doubt you troll Jane's for informative intelligence analysis.
Dictation? You condescending little fuck. I read Janes everyday.
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
Last edited by dayarath (2008-02-12 12:44:00)
inane little opines
I though he said dictation. Oh well. I misread it. Please forgive me mrs poe?CameronPoe wrote:
lol. You do know what DICTION as opposed to DICTATION is? Way to prove Ken right!usmarine wrote:
Once the remote email server comes back up, I will show that I am a member and do have a subscription.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
For some reason I am calling bullshit - that you found info. Maybe it is your lack of comprehension and diction on this site, but I doubt you troll Jane's for informative intelligence analysis.
Dictation? You condescending little fuck. I read Janes everyday.
Last edited by usmarine (2008-02-12 12:44:21)
Well you need to pay to get the article. Bf2s being the lovely community it is, you'd think someone would save everyone money and just paste the article.dayarath wrote:
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
He could prove his point here and now. A simple PrintScreen and a trip to ImageShack. I cannot accept his point without the evidence to hand. Who the fuck said anything non-sarcastic about being fair and balanced?dayarath wrote:
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-12 12:46:22)
I could. But won't.jord wrote:
Bf2s being the lovely community it is
Well, maybe not? You do know that on something like this there is a possible punishment involved to paste it on the internets for free? I don't want to anyway, and if you pay for something it's usually your privilege to be able to be granted the information, not spread it around for free.jord wrote:
Well you need to pay to get the article. Bf2s being the lovely community it is, you'd think someone would save everyone money and just paste the article.dayarath wrote:
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
inane little opines
Only if they don't mind getting sued by Jane's for EULA and copyright infringement.jord wrote:
Well you need to pay to get the article. Bf2s being the lovely community it is, you'd think someone would save everyone money and just paste the article.dayarath wrote:
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
I don't really get what punishment he would be given... I agree with it is his choice and privilege to do so...dayarath wrote:
Well, maybe not? You do know that on something like this there is a possible punishment involved to paste it on the internets for free? I don't want to anyway, and if you pay for something it's usually your privilege to be able to be granted the information, not spread it around for free.jord wrote:
Well you need to pay to get the article. Bf2s being the lovely community it is, you'd think someone would save everyone money and just paste the article.dayarath wrote:
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
My mate Tony is a MP and he knows lots of inside info and has an MP but I'm not going to link you because I dun wanna.
Last edited by jord (2008-02-12 12:50:10)
Read my post further above. And if that was sarcasm ASWELL, then my friend you put way too much sarcasm on the internet. I perceive as such that you actually do think you're fair and balanced.CameronPoe wrote:
He could prove his point here and now. A simple PrintScreen and a trip to ImageShack. I cannot accept his point without the evidence to hand. Who the fuck said anything non-sarcastic about being fair and balanced?dayarath wrote:
Isn't it obvious wtf.
He told you he's a member, he'll post he's subscribed but if you want the article you should get it yourself.
What's the problem here? You like biting someone in the heels don't you? above ^ yeah, very nice. Very very balanced & fair Cam. You impress me.
inane little opines
Copyright infringement. Can get up pretty high if you ask me. Now well, if you don't want to trust him on his word do so, but I don't really see marine as the 13 year old spreading lies.jord wrote:
I don't really get what punishment he would be given... I agree with it is his choice and privilege to do so...dayarath wrote:
Well, maybe not? You do know that on something like this there is a possible punishment involved to paste it on the internets for free? I don't want to anyway, and if you pay for something it's usually your privilege to be able to be granted the information, not spread it around for free.jord wrote:
Well you need to pay to get the article. Bf2s being the lovely community it is, you'd think someone would save everyone money and just paste the article.
My mate Tony is a MP and he knows lots of inside info and has a blod but I'm not going to link you because I dun wanna.
inane little opines
There isn't a man alive that doesn't have a bias when compared against someone else. I'm currently searching Janes for their subscription rate incidentally.dayarath wrote:
Read my post further above. And if that was sarcasm ASWELL, then my friend you put way too much sarcasm on the internet. I perceive as such that you actually do think you're fair and balanced.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-12 12:53:02)