physics, you can think your way through it without having to memorize shit
do pre-ap. it's pretty much an easy class, plus you get the weighted gpa with itThaReaper wrote:
Well, I'm in Algebra 2. I'll be in Pre-Cal next year. I think I'm gonna go with physics, I just don't know if I should do Pre-AP =Pcowami wrote:
It shouldn't be (so long as you're good in math [it helps to have a little bit of calc under your belt] and physics). It's just that my teacher can't really teach, per se.ThaReaper wrote:
Is it really hard?
What is this "Pre-AP" business?Jello.01 wrote:
do pre-ap. it's pretty much an easy class, plus you get the weighted gpa with itThaReaper wrote:
Well, I'm in Algebra 2. I'll be in Pre-Cal next year. I think I'm gonna go with physics, I just don't know if I should do Pre-AP =Pcowami wrote:
It shouldn't be (so long as you're good in math [it helps to have a little bit of calc under your belt] and physics). It's just that my teacher can't really teach, per se.
PHYSICS FTW!! So you can get Physics teachers like this..
It's suppose to be for smarter kids. Instead of grading on a 4.0 scale they grade on a 5.0 scale.cowami wrote:
What is this "Pre-AP" business?Jello.01 wrote:
do pre-ap. it's pretty much an easy class, plus you get the weighted gpa with itThaReaper wrote:
Well, I'm in Algebra 2. I'll be in Pre-Cal next year. I think I'm gonna go with physics, I just don't know if I should do Pre-AP =P
Physics .. then astrophysics .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
hey thats what i want to go intoKmarion wrote:
Physics .. then astrophysics .
chem
Do some research. It really depends on the teacher (instructor). A good teacher (instruction) can make a crappy subject great and a bad teacher (instructor) can make a great subject suck.
Physcis leads to mechanics which leads to cool kit. Planes, trains and automobiles. (lots of cash)
Chemistry leads to explosions, reactions etc. I have friends doing environmental chemitsry and alternative power. Both did chemistry.
I did physics and I work in an aerospace defence company. We cant choose for you but tbh I have heard that Chem is far harder than Phys and I'm inclined to agree
Chemistry leads to explosions, reactions etc. I have friends doing environmental chemitsry and alternative power. Both did chemistry.
I did physics and I work in an aerospace defence company. We cant choose for you but tbh I have heard that Chem is far harder than Phys and I'm inclined to agree
pre calc is easy, physics (that you will be taking if you don't have calc) is easy...chemistry is memorizing a whole bunch of random shit.
Last edited by VicktorVauhn (2008-02-14 01:34:48)
Physics
then Theroretical Physics
Gordan Freeman ftw!
then Theroretical Physics
Gordan Freeman ftw!
Last edited by henno13 (2008-02-14 01:37:14)
Doesn't matter which you do, they're both about memorising random shite. But you need to have the understanding to do your job later in life, even if you don't directly apply the knowledge.
On a separate note: I recommend Further Maths as a module. If you go to uni you will really wish you did more maths in college. I didn't do it and as a result had to play catch-up for an entire year.
On a separate note: I recommend Further Maths as a module. If you go to uni you will really wish you did more maths in college. I didn't do it and as a result had to play catch-up for an entire year.
im not sure how they grade over there. but its the same difference here.
and if you are behind in something when your at uni you just get a tutor.
and if you are behind in something when your at uni you just get a tutor.
chemistry. I hate physics.
Physics if you can handle advanced math and if you are ready to commit to a life of putting everything in a perfect order when giving an assignment to your teacher - atleast mine wants.
Chemistry tends to concentrate on fewer subjects.
Chemistry tends to concentrate on fewer subjects.
A tutor!? you kidding me? Open sessions ftw
Reaper if you really want to be a pilot then its gotta be physics all the way. If its really a choice of one over the other then what good is a pilot that doesn't understand the laws of motion
Reaper if you really want to be a pilot then its gotta be physics all the way. If its really a choice of one over the other then what good is a pilot that doesn't understand the laws of motion
Physics!
physics is what ima doing @ a level
Judging by the content of this post, I should have taken Physics too.ThaReaper wrote:
Next year I have a choice between physics or chemistry and I don't know which one I should do.
Which one is better in your guyses opinions?
Chemistry is 10% practical. You know, the fun stuff?
Rest is equations, maths and theory. It's shit. I regret taking it, when I could have had so much more fun in Physics and actually get a Credit grade instead of the General I'm getting in Chemistry because I simply can't be arsed.
Take Physics.
Its not about whats more fun, its about what will benefit him later on in life, since he wants to be a pilot.KILLSWITCH wrote:
I found Chemistry way more interesting than physics.
I take it you are still in high school. Physics will most likely be simple algebra. I took both chemistry and physics in one year in high school, you might be able to as well. I loved chemistry, but I am getting a MS in physics. My opinion might be tainted. :-p
this isn't really true...I have almost nothing memorized for physics....If you take the time to actually understand the material you can figure out what you need then glance at an equation sheet and figure out what will give you the proper variables. Unless you really don't understand the material, or relly don't try physics is MUCH more intuitive then chemistry, at least at lower levels.sgtdude1987 wrote:
Doesn't matter which you do, they're both about memorising random shite. But you need to have the understanding to do your job later in life, even if you don't directly apply the knowledge.
On a separate note: I recommend Further Maths as a module. If you go to uni you will really wish you did more maths in college. I didn't do it and as a result had to play catch-up for an entire year.
The problem with learning chemisty is that you don't know enough chemistry for things to make sense. Most rules and trends you have to learn "randomly" don't apply in certain situation because some higher level chemistry is taking place. In chemistry you kinda just have to take their word for it and memorize and eventually you will know enough chem to understand why. Physics they tell you something, do a demo to prove it, and then break it down into why right there.
I personally suck at memorizing...I don't know the arc length formula, I know that its basically a summation of the limit of the distance formula as the distance between two points approaches zero, and that the distance formula is the a Pythagorean therm thing. If your like that Physics will be much less frustration.
Right now? Both would be the best option. Even though I know you can't do that.
Chemical Engineering is a job that companies ( such as BP, Shell etc ) are crying out for. They need more and will be willing to pay extravagant salaries for such a position ( upwards of £55k > $110k ). I don't know which one you should choose. The more worthwhile job you can grab with either of those subjects is Engineering.
Grab Physics.
Chemical Engineering is a job that companies ( such as BP, Shell etc ) are crying out for. They need more and will be willing to pay extravagant salaries for such a position ( upwards of £55k > $110k ). I don't know which one you should choose. The more worthwhile job you can grab with either of those subjects is Engineering.
Grab Physics.
Physics doesn't require memorization? Maybe in your dreams. Not every exam gives you a formula sheet. And with every science, when you learn the basics, you have to trust that the complicated stuff is happening. Physics is no different in that respect. When did high school physics have you deal with the Coriolis effect or phantom forces? Never, that's when.VicktorVauhn wrote:
this isn't really true...I have almost nothing memorized for physics....If you take the time to actually understand the material you can figure out what you need then glance at an equation sheet and figure out what will give you the proper variables. Unless you really don't understand the material, or relly don't try physics is MUCH more intuitive then chemistry, at least at lower levels.
The problem with learning chemisty is that you don't know enough chemistry for things to make sense. Most rules and trends you have to learn "randomly" don't apply in certain situation because some higher level chemistry is taking place. In chemistry you kinda just have to take their word for it and memorize and eventually you will know enough chem to understand why. Physics they tell you something, do a demo to prove it, and then break it down into why right there.
I personally suck at memorizing...I don't know the arc length formula, I know that its basically a summation of the limit of the distance formula as the distance between two points approaches zero, and that the distance formula is the a Pythagorean therm thing. If your like that Physics will be much less frustration.
Go physics. It gives you critical problem solving skills, if nothing else.