http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, … 28,00.html
Good marketing or good technology/design?
Discuss
Good marketing or good technology/design?
Discuss
Thats complete marketing bs, a boot makes miniscule differences. I'll stick to my
Lighter and thinner
Lighter and thinner
Puma, eh? Are u a Spurs fan like me? I'll be watching the UEFA Cup match live tonight on Fivebennisboy wrote:
Thats complete marketing bs, a boot makes miniscule differences. I'll stick to my
http://www.3qsports.co.uk/3qimages/v1.06%20blue.jpg
Lighter and thinner
I'll stick to my Nike total 90 any day, the best boots I ever had.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
how did you guess?{HMS}_Sir_Del_Boy wrote:
Puma, eh? Are u a Spurs fan like me? I'll be watching the UEFA Cup match live tonight on Fivebennisboy wrote:
Thats complete marketing bs, a boot makes miniscule differences. I'll stick to my
http://www.3qsports.co.uk/3qimages/v1.06%20blue.jpg
Lighter and thinner
I am indeed a spurs fan, hopefully we'll get another win
a boot, is a boot
incorrect, boots do generally have a default "position"Mek-Izzle wrote:
a boot, is a boot
eg Copa Mundials or othger no nonsense boots for centre backs.
f50s for wingers or full backs
Preds for centre mids
The above Pumas or vapours for strikers
boots do have different characteristics that help with different play styles, but not to the extent nike tried to bullshit in that article
the mercurial vapor boots just look shit and are over advertised. go to http://www.teamtalk.com and the ads for this boot is taking over the place!
i'll stick with my
i'll stick with my