blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|7127
More bad news for Pats

A team of out-of-state attorneys has filed a lawsuit seeking $100 million in damages from the Patriots and coach Bill Belichick claiming that the team defrauded St. Louis fans and players when they allegedly taped a Rams practice before narrowly winning the 2002 Super Bowl.

"Also, Mike Fish reported on ESPN that St. Louis' walk-through was devoted to red zone plays -- all new plays and new formations the Rams had not shown during the season. Going into that Super Bowl, the Rams' "Greatest Show on Turf" was the league's highest-scoring team. In that game, St. Louis was held to a field goal in the first half. The Rams kept getting bogged down, as if New England knew what plays were coming. If the Patriots secretly taped the Rams' walk-through, then stopped the red zone plays the Rams showed in that walk-through, then won that Super Bowl by three points, then logic says New England materially benefited from cheating in the Super Bowl. If true, this would be the worst sports scandal since the Black Sox."

The complaint, filed today in U.S. District Court in New Orleans, is one in a series of attacks on the team and Belichick, who were fined and sanctioned in last year’s “Spygate” scandal for videotaping signals during a 2007 New York Jets game.The lawsuit, brought on behalf of former Rams player Willie Gary, two 2002 Super Bowl ticket holders and a Rams seat license holder, claims that the alleged taping gave the Patriots an edge that won the game, thus defrauding Rams fans and players out of millions of dollars.

“It is the contention of the plaintiffs that but for the videotaping, known and unknown at this time, and based upon the results of the game by a field goal margin, the outcome of the game would have been different,” said Eric Deters, a Kentucky attorney who filed the lawsuit.Patriots spokesman Stacey James said today,"we don’t comment on those types of things."

This isn’t the first time a losing team’s fans have tried to take legal action against the Patriots.After last year’s Spygate scandal, New York Jets fan Carl J. Mayer filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all Jets season-ticket holders, according to published reports. Mayer calculated that fans paid $61 million to watch eight “fraudulent” games between the Jets and the Pats.

This latest lawsuit is based on allegations that a team employee recorded the Rams walk-through practice on the Saturday before Super Bowl XXXVI at the Louisiana Superdome. The Patriots won the game 20-17.The Patriots and the National Football League have said there is no evidence that the 2002 taping occurred.Deters said he has no firsthand evidence that the 2002 taping occurred, either. He based the complaint on media reports.

The lawsuit seeks $35 million in damages covering, among other things, the loss of Super Bowl rings, bonuses and endorsements for the 45 Rams players and cost of $400 tickets for 72,922 fans at the game.“Each ticket attendee of the game paid millions of dollars to watch a supposedly honest competitive game,” according to the lawsuit.The attorneys are seeking that the damages be tripled under the Civil Rico laws, bringing the damages to $100 million.

The attorneys also want the complaint to be certified as a class action lawsuit for three distinct classes - Rams players; the 72,922 fans who bought tickets for the 2002 Super Bowl; and owners of Rams seat licenses for the 2001-2002 season.The suit names the Patriots, on behalf of owner Robert Kraft, and Belichick.The plaintiffs include Gary; ticket holder Kevin Hacker of Cincinnati, Ohio; ticket holder Marcus Miller of Collinsville, Ill.; and Peter Trout of St. Charles, Mo., the owner of two Rams seat licenses.

The suit was filed today in U.S. District Court Eastern Division in New Orleans and has been assigned to a judge, according to a court clerk. Summons have been issued to the Patriots and Belichick, the clerk said.

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/foot … rticleFull
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st … ortCat=nfl
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6928|Chicago, IL
Gold diggers TBH, It doesn't even seem like the Rams players or fans have anything to do with the lawsuit, just a bunch of greedy lawyers with dollar signs in their eyes.

I remember way back when the NFL used to be about Football...
KuSTaV
noice
+947|6993|Gold Coast

S.Lythberg wrote:

Gold diggers TBH, It doesn't even seem like the Rams players or fans have anything to do with the lawsuit, just a bunch of greedy lawyers with dollar signs in their eyes.

I remember way back when the NFL used to be about Football...
QFTMFT.

But its the same with all sports these days... look at the English Premier league.
noice                                                                                                        https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/awsmsanta.png
Darkhelmet
cereal killer
+233|7232|the middle of nowhere
2002? A little, late I think.
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|7127
Dont know you think there is something fishy how Pats knew all of the Rams secret plays which they ran that week since they never used them before? How they managed to hold them to just 3 points in first half? It was like they knew what plays Rams were going to run.
Switch
Knee Deep In Clunge
+489|6945|Tyne & Wear, England
Go Pats?
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6927|The Land of Scott Walker
I hope this lawsuit tears the Pats and Belichick a new one.
N00bkilla55404
Voices are calling...
+136|6413|Somewhere out in Space
Lol, patriots.

Lol, another lawsuit by greedy lawyers.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7243

Fucking cheaters and sore losers.

losers.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|7019|Long Island, New York

blademaster wrote:

More bad news for Pats

A team of out-of-state attorneys has filed a lawsuit seeking $100 million in damages from the Patriots and coach Bill Belichick claiming that the team defrauded St. Louis fans and players when they allegedly taped a Rams practice before narrowly winning the 2002 Super Bowl.

"Also, Mike Fish reported on ESPN that St. Louis' walk-through was devoted to red zone plays -- all new plays and new formations the Rams had not shown during the season. Going into that Super Bowl, the Rams' "Greatest Show on Turf" was the league's highest-scoring team. In that game, St. Louis was held to a field goal in the first half. The Rams kept getting bogged down, as if New England knew what plays were coming. If the Patriots secretly taped the Rams' walk-through, then stopped the red zone plays the Rams showed in that walk-through, then won that Super Bowl by three points, then logic says New England materially benefited from cheating in the Super Bowl. If true, this would be the worst sports scandal since the Black Sox."

The complaint, filed today in U.S. District Court in New Orleans, is one in a series of attacks on the team and Belichick, who were fined and sanctioned in last year’s “Spygate” scandal for videotaping signals during a 2007 New York Jets game.The lawsuit, brought on behalf of former Rams player Willie Gary, two 2002 Super Bowl ticket holders and a Rams seat license holder, claims that the alleged taping gave the Patriots an edge that won the game, thus defrauding Rams fans and players out of millions of dollars.

“It is the contention of the plaintiffs that but for the videotaping, known and unknown at this time, and based upon the results of the game by a field goal margin, the outcome of the game would have been different,” said Eric Deters, a Kentucky attorney who filed the lawsuit.Patriots spokesman Stacey James said today,"we don’t comment on those types of things."

This isn’t the first time a losing team’s fans have tried to take legal action against the Patriots.After last year’s Spygate scandal, New York Jets fan Carl J. Mayer filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all Jets season-ticket holders, according to published reports. Mayer calculated that fans paid $61 million to watch eight “fraudulent” games between the Jets and the Pats.

This latest lawsuit is based on allegations that a team employee recorded the Rams walk-through practice on the Saturday before Super Bowl XXXVI at the Louisiana Superdome. The Patriots won the game 20-17.The Patriots and the National Football League have said there is no evidence that the 2002 taping occurred.Deters said he has no firsthand evidence that the 2002 taping occurred, either. He based the complaint on media reports.

The lawsuit seeks $35 million in damages covering, among other things, the loss of Super Bowl rings, bonuses and endorsements for the 45 Rams players and cost of $400 tickets for 72,922 fans at the game.“Each ticket attendee of the game paid millions of dollars to watch a supposedly honest competitive game,” according to the lawsuit.The attorneys are seeking that the damages be tripled under the Civil Rico laws, bringing the damages to $100 million.

The attorneys also want the complaint to be certified as a class action lawsuit for three distinct classes - Rams players; the 72,922 fans who bought tickets for the 2002 Super Bowl; and owners of Rams seat licenses for the 2001-2002 season.The suit names the Patriots, on behalf of owner Robert Kraft, and Belichick.The plaintiffs include Gary; ticket holder Kevin Hacker of Cincinnati, Ohio; ticket holder Marcus Miller of Collinsville, Ill.; and Peter Trout of St. Charles, Mo., the owner of two Rams seat licenses.

The suit was filed today in U.S. District Court Eastern Division in New Orleans and has been assigned to a judge, according to a court clerk. Summons have been issued to the Patriots and Belichick, the clerk said.

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/foot … rticleFull
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st … ortCat=nfl
Even as a Jets fan, I was glad to see the Pats win in '02. It was like 4 months after 9/11, and for a team called the "Patriots" to win, it helped boost morale. Atleast, for me it did.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,993|7114|949

ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|7004
lol 100m aint shit
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6443|Washington DC

ig wrote:

lol 100m aint shit
lawl?
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|7136

Gold diggers? Yes.
But do I still want them to win because I hate the Pats and they deserve it for being such slimy bastards? Yes. (Though losing this year's Super Bowl was probably punishment enough).
geNius
..!.,
+144|6924|SoCal
No matter what anyone's feelings are on the "scandal", there is indeed sufficient grounds for a lawsuit.  They may not get the $100M, but they will get money.
https://srejects.com/genius/srejects.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard