8800GT and BF2

2008-02-26 10:43:33

#26

gmoschgat: Member; +5|6727

Processor: AMD Athlon X2 6400+ 3.2GHz (Dual Core) (2 MB Cache) w/HyperTransport
Motherboard: Asus M2N-E SLI (nForce 5 series SLI Chipset)
Memory: 2GB DDR2 Corsair at 800MHz XMS2 (Dual Channel) (Performance)
Hard Drive 1: 160GB Western Digital (16MB Cache) (7200 RPM) (SATA)
Video Card: nVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB (By: eVGA) (PCI-Express)

https://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd11/gmoschgat/poll/DSCF0036.jpg

https://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd11/gmoschgat/poll/DSCF0037.jpg

pic of fps
=
ownage!

2008-02-26 10:45:03

#27

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6843|Area 51

gmoschgat wrote:
Processor: AMD Athlon X2 6400+ 3.2GHz (Dual Core) (2 MB Cache) w/HyperTransport
Motherboard: Asus M2N-E SLI (nForce 5 series SLI Chipset)
Memory: 2GB DDR2 Corsair at 800MHz XMS2 (Dual Channel) (Performance)
Hard Drive 1: 160GB Western Digital (16MB Cache) (7200 RPM) (SATA)
Video Card: nVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MB (By: eVGA) (PCI-Express)

http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd11 … CF0036.jpg
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd11 … CF0037.jpg

pic of fps
=
ownage!

We meant you could never play Crysis @ 100 FPS. 100 FPS is common nowadays

2008-02-26 10:45:29

#28

prototype: Member; +52|6589

at what FPS point is a game un-playable?

I can not imagine playing a game with 20 FPS

2008-02-26 10:46:13

#29

gmoschgat: Member; +5|6727

ohh.........oops

but crysis on med i get 90 to 100 i beliece . im going to look into it

Last edited by gmoschgat (2008-02-26 10:47:27)

2008-02-26 10:47:02

#30

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|6760|Birmingham UK

gmoschgat wrote:
played crysis demo on med with aax2 and got 100 to 90 fps. then went and maxed it and it dropped to 50 fps.

lol...at u .....100fps when lookin at some grass how demanding rofl

2008-02-26 10:48:04

#31

']['error: Banned; +630|6922|The Netherlands

I have also have an 8800GT. I run all high, 8xAA on 1280x1024, frame never drops beneath 95fps lol.
Rest of system: E6600 @ 2.8ghz, Gigabyte-p35-s3, 4gigs 800mhz ram, vista ultimate x64.

edit:

crysis on high, 1280x1024, no AA. Don't know about the framerates but I almost never lag, only during very big explosions it lags a little bit.

Last edited by ']['error (2008-02-26 10:50:04)

2008-02-26 10:48:21

#32

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6692|Finland

gmoschgat wrote:
ohh.........oops

but crysis on med i get 90 to 100 i beliece . im going to look into it

NO WAY...

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-26 11:07:59

#33

gmoschgat: Member; +5|6727

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
gmoschgat wrote:
ohh.........oops

but crysis on med i get 90 to 100 i beliece . im going to look into it
NO WAY...

u r correct. im not sure what game i was thinking about. just tried crysis on med aax4 and got 67 fps.....im a noob. 67 being the highest i got in demo...sry fellas

Last edited by gmoschgat (2008-02-26 11:08:30)

2008-02-26 11:19:52

#34

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6475|Winland

I can run Crysis maxed DX9 without AA on my 7600GS.

At 1.3FPS.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-02-26 11:21:33

#35

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|6760|Birmingham UK

1.3 fps lmfao ...omg thts quality

2008-02-26 11:24:43

#36

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6475|Winland

02fxnmaurer wrote:
1.3 fps lmfao ...omg thts quality

Quite good for a midrange, last-gen card, really. I also tested in the caves after the elevator crashed, so it was quite an advanced scene with all those boxes and shit.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-02-26 11:28:14

#37

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|6760|Birmingham UK

i might try install it ...on my...

p4 2.2ghz
ati 9550 256mb
512mb ram

i might be able to beat ur score of 1.3fps

2008-02-26 12:06:40

#38

aimless: Member; +166|6403|Texas

I have a quick question, will my 8800GT before better at higher resolutions? I know with my 9600xt in vcod, i could get 125 fps constant at 1280x1024 but only about 111 constant at 1024x768.

Now with my 8800GT which is like a thousand times greater, I still can't hit 333 fps in vcod at 1280x1024.

And before you say "OMG LYKE YOU CAN'T SEE THE DIFFERENCE", I know that. It's for jump maps.

Last edited by aimless (2008-02-26 12:07:07)

2008-02-26 12:11:35

#39

prototype: Member; +52|6589

what is VCOD and 333 FPS?

i cant get 333FPS on oregon trail

2008-02-26 12:13:09

#40

aimless: Member; +166|6403|Texas

prototype wrote:
what is VCOD and 333 FPS?

i cant get 333FPS on oregon trail

Call of Duty 1

It used the quake engine, and at certain framerates, you can get higher jumps.

2008-02-26 12:56:49

#41

The_Sniper_NM: Official EVGA Fanboy; +94|6392|SC | USA |

Currently:
8800GTS 512
E6300 (Stock)
2gb @ 667.

All high, X8 @ 1680x1050. Get about 60-80 normally. Maxes when still.

2008-02-26 13:32:49

#42

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6475|Winland

02fxnmaurer wrote:
i might try install it ...on my...

p4 2.2ghz
ati 9550 256mb
512mb ram

i might be able to beat ur score of 1.3fps

I have a P4 Willamette (First gen, sucks ass) 1.7GHz with 512MB RAM and a Radeon 9600SE (Slower than the 9500/9550). Don't try it.

If you insist on a low-FPS battle, I'll run it on a 466MHz Celeron with the 9600SE... Kekekekekekekeke

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-02-26 14:13:02

#43

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|6760|Birmingham UK

Freezer7Pro wrote:
02fxnmaurer wrote:
i might try install it ...on my...

p4 2.2ghz
ati 9550 256mb
512mb ram

i might be able to beat ur score of 1.3fps
I have a P4 Willamette (First gen, sucks ass) 1.7GHz with 512MB RAM and a Radeon 9600SE (Slower than the 9500/9550). Don't try it.

If you insist on a low-FPS battle, I'll run it on a 466MHz Celeron with the 9600SE... Kekekekekekekeke

ill pwn u ...by openin a couple of apps with it ...u cnt win ....or borrow my mates 9200 radeon

2008-02-26 14:17:35

#44

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6933

You should have no problems with running the 8800 on BF2. I have a 3850 and I play on 1280x1024 with everything as high as it can go and full AA and get FPS around 100 most of the time. There's really nothing to worry about.

2008-02-28 06:00:02

#45

Ayumiz: J-10 whore; +103|7012|Singapore

Well crap, I got this crap with 8800gt. Bf2142 runs fine, althought titan maps with 48 guys in there still gives me 15fps inside the titan.

https://img176.imageshack.us/img176/1715/screen008jl3.jpg

2008-02-28 06:40:51

#46

rh27: Not really a Brit; +51|6875|England

Ayumiz wrote:
Well crap, I got this crap with 8800gt. Bf2142 runs fine, althought titan maps with 48 guys in there still gives me 15fps inside the titan.

http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/1715 … 008jl3.jpg

Looks like overheating to me tbh, have it checked.

2008-02-28 06:43:15

#47

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6692|Finland

rh27 wrote:
Ayumiz wrote:
Well crap, I got this crap with 8800gt. Bf2142 runs fine, althought titan maps with 48 guys in there still gives me 15fps inside the titan.

http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/1715 … 008jl3.jpg
Looks like overheating to me tbh, have it checked.

My GTX runs BF2142 64 player titan maps really smooth. 8800GT should be able to perform almost as good. Overheating could be the problem...

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-02-28 06:44:20)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2008-02-28 06:47:10

#48

Ayumiz: J-10 whore; +103|7012|Singapore

I checked with everest. It says 60 when i was playing it

2008-02-28 06:54:29

#49

prototype: Member; +52|6589

will I need to worry about overheating on my new 8800GT

It comes today and I want to avoid any problems if possible by taking needed preventive measures

2008-02-28 08:47:51

#50

02fxnmaurer: Member; +75|6760|Birmingham UK

no u wont ...as long as you have a reasonable amount of airflow in your case....i have an antec 900 an my gpu runs at 41 under load

BF2S Forums 8800GT and BF2

gmoschgat wrote:

gmoschgat wrote:

gmoschgat wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

gmoschgat wrote:

02fxnmaurer wrote:

prototype wrote:

02fxnmaurer wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

02fxnmaurer wrote:

Ayumiz wrote:

rh27 wrote:

Ayumiz wrote:

Board footer