Brasso
member
+1,549|7058

U.S. Only

Current examples.  In case you need a refresher, they're life, liberty, and property.  Go.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
geNius
..!.,
+144|6870|SoCal
With every passing bill, our liberties are slowly infringed upon.
https://srejects.com/genius/srejects.png
Brasso
member
+1,549|7058

geNius wrote:

With every passing bill, our liberties are slowly infringed upon.
Article please.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7060|949

Government buying property under the guise of conservation or wildlife protection.

http://www.rangemagazine.com/specialrep … iberty.pdf

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-02-27 14:42:48)

Brasso
member
+1,549|7058

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Government buying property under the guise of conservation or wildlife protection.

haffeysucks wrote:

Article please.
I know it's happening with the purchase of land in Alaska, but I found no articles.

nvm, thanks

any more?

Last edited by haffeysucks (2008-02-27 14:48:44)

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6919|Northern California
Eminent domain for both public and private works is an example of how the government infringes on the rights of it's citizens.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|7072
what exactly are our "natural" rights.


only thing nature guarantees is death
Brasso
member
+1,549|7058

IRONCHEF wrote:

Eminent domain for both public and private works is an example of how the government infringes on the rights of it's citizens.
Got United States vs. Carmack for that, thanks.

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

what exactly are our "natural" rights.


only thing nature guarantees is death
Take it up with John Locke...the one not from Lost.

Last edited by haffeysucks (2008-02-27 14:54:54)

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7257|Grapevine, TX
[TEXAS] Trans Texas Corridor (Super Mega Huge Highway) At first I though it sounded great when i heard about the plans over 10 years ago. It has evolved in to a monster I dont want residing in my great State. Period.

Four Priority Corridors and several additional corridor routes were proposed in the official Crossroads of the Americas: The Trans Texas Corridor Plan adopted by the Texas Transportation Commission at their June 27, 2002 meeting.

The four Priority Corridors are described as being built (1) parallel to I-35/I-37 and the proposed I-69 from near Denison to the Rio Grande Valley; (2) along the path of I-69 from Laredo around Houston to near Texarkana; (3) parallel to I-45 from the Dallas-Fort Worth area to Houston; and, (4) parallel to I-10 from near El Paso to near Orange. These four Priority Corridors alone total 4,000 miles. Together with the additional corridor routes identified in the Crossroads of the Americas: The Trans Texas Corridor Plan the corridors could total 8,000 miles or more.

The Priority TTC Corridors are commonly known as: TTC-35, TTC-69, TTC-10 & TTC-45.

None of the corridor routes have ever been defined by the Legislature. Neither has the Legislature established any limits on size such as length or width. State Law establishing the Trans Texas Corridor (House Bill 3588) granted the Texas Transportation Commission complete authority to designate any existing or future facility as the Trans Texas Corridor.

    [url=http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-hb3588-text-01.htmTransportation Code, Section 227.001(8) reads, "Trans-Texas Corridor" means the statewide system of facilities designated by the commission under this chapter.[/url]
Emanate Domain is NOT American!

Official Texas Transportation Website for this BS

https://www.channelingreality.com/images/Trade_Corridor_70.JPG
https://www.bcsmpo.org/TransTexasCorridor.gif
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6342|Glendale, CA
Eminent domain...Seig Heil!

Eminent domain is an example of natural rights abuse, so is the fact that if you join the army, you can't leave it.  It's not like everybody who joins the army immediately leaves it.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6839|'Murka

FallenMorgan wrote:

Eminent domain...Seig Heil!

Eminent domain is an example of natural rights abuse, so is the fact that if you join the army, you can't leave it.  It's not like everybody who joins the army immediately leaves it.
While I agree with the eminent domain argument...you are completely whacked when it comes to your view of the military.

When you join the military, you sign a contract. That means you are legally bound by the terms of that contract, which include a length of service before you can get out. Which includes the possibility of stop-loss. Which includes the possibility of death (aka "unlimited liability").
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7257|Grapevine, TX

FEOS wrote:

FallenMorgan wrote:

Eminent domain...Seig Heil!

Eminent domain is an example of natural rights abuse, so is the fact that if you join the army, you can't leave it.  It's not like everybody who joins the army immediately leaves it.
While I agree with the eminent domain argument...you are completely whacked when it comes to your view of the military.

When you join the military, you sign a contract. That means you are legally bound by the terms of that contract, which include a length of service before you can get out. Which includes the possibility of stop-loss. Which includes the possibility of death (aka "unlimited liability").
Right on FEOS, This 16yearold is just like most 16yr olds. They know everything, are always right, and admittedly gets most of his whacked ideas from the internet and TV.

Morgan, seriously man, i think you are a pretty bright kid but you should use that to your advantage and talk about thinks you have profound knowledge about. You dont impress anyone when you make comments like that, or fail to answer your own threads. When you talk about things you have absolutely no understanding of, you look really stupid. Like the Military, taxes, etc...Just a tip.

Last edited by (T)eflon(S)hadow (2008-02-28 08:03:43)

ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7077

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:

[TEXAS] Trans Texas Corridor (Super Mega Huge Highway) At first I though it sounded great when i heard about the plans over 10 years ago. It has evolved in to a monster I dont want residing in my great State. Period.

Four Priority Corridors and several additional corridor routes were proposed in the official Crossroads of the Americas: The Trans Texas Corridor Plan adopted by the Texas Transportation Commission at their June 27, 2002 meeting.

The four Priority Corridors are described as being built (1) parallel to I-35/I-37 and the proposed I-69 from near Denison to the Rio Grande Valley; (2) along the path of I-69 from Laredo around Houston to near Texarkana; (3) parallel to I-45 from the Dallas-Fort Worth area to Houston; and, (4) parallel to I-10 from near El Paso to near Orange. These four Priority Corridors alone total 4,000 miles. Together with the additional corridor routes identified in the Crossroads of the Americas: The Trans Texas Corridor Plan the corridors could total 8,000 miles or more.

The Priority TTC Corridors are commonly known as: TTC-35, TTC-69, TTC-10 & TTC-45.

None of the corridor routes have ever been defined by the Legislature. Neither has the Legislature established any limits on size such as length or width. State Law establishing the Trans Texas Corridor (House Bill 3588) granted the Texas Transportation Commission complete authority to designate any existing or future facility as the Trans Texas Corridor.

    [url=http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-hb3588-text-01.htmTransportation Code, Section 227.001(8) reads, "Trans-Texas Corridor" means the statewide system of facilities designated by the commission under this chapter.[/url]
Emanate Domain is NOT American!

Official Texas Transportation Website for this BS

http://www.channelingreality.com/images … dor_70.JPG
http://www.bcsmpo.org/TransTexasCorridor.gif
That looks really useful for getting large quantities of illegal immigrants into the US quickly...
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7142|US
Warrantless taps, inprisonment without speedy trial (mostly with non-citizens, but still...), gun-control (like DC and Chicago's bans)

The thing that bugs me is how far Congress stretches the interstate commerce clause...basically, if you do anything that costs or makes money, they can find a way to make legislation on it.  I'm not sure that was what was meant by the clause.
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7257|Grapevine, TX

ghettoperson wrote:

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:

[TEXAS] Trans Texas Corridor (Super Mega Huge Highway) At first I though it sounded great when i heard about the plans over 10 years ago. It has evolved in to a monster I dont want residing in my great State. Period.

Four Priority Corridors and several additional corridor routes were proposed in the official Crossroads of the Americas: The Trans Texas Corridor Plan adopted by the Texas Transportation Commission at their June 27, 2002 meeting.

The four Priority Corridors are described as being built (1) parallel to I-35/I-37 and the proposed I-69 from near Denison to the Rio Grande Valley; (2) along the path of I-69 from Laredo around Houston to near Texarkana; (3) parallel to I-45 from the Dallas-Fort Worth area to Houston; and, (4) parallel to I-10 from near El Paso to near Orange. These four Priority Corridors alone total 4,000 miles. Together with the additional corridor routes identified in the Crossroads of the Americas: The Trans Texas Corridor Plan the corridors could total 8,000 miles or more.

The Priority TTC Corridors are commonly known as: TTC-35, TTC-69, TTC-10 & TTC-45.

None of the corridor routes have ever been defined by the Legislature. Neither has the Legislature established any limits on size such as length or width. State Law establishing the Trans Texas Corridor (House Bill 3588) granted the Texas Transportation Commission complete authority to designate any existing or future facility as the Trans Texas Corridor.

    [url=http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/cw-hb3588-text-01.htmTransportation Code, Section 227.001(8) reads, "Trans-Texas Corridor" means the statewide system of facilities designated by the commission under this chapter.[/url]
Emanate Domain is NOT American!

Official Texas Transportation Website for this BS

http://www.channelingreality.com/images … dor_70.JPG
http://www.bcsmpo.org/TransTexasCorridor.gif
That looks really useful for getting large quantities of illegal immigrants into the US quickly...
Even foreigners can see the problem with this +1

Yeah its actually a very good design, and Texas has enough land to build it, but not the way these "selected" board of directors are going about it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard