Is this realistic? Terminator Scenario Baby!

2008-02-27 19:37:55

#1

13rin: Member; +977|6907

For those of us that is familiar to Sarah O'Conner and "You Could be Mine" -by Axel Rose, it has finally happened. Those that watched Battle Bots also might want to take notice.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id … _article=1

The technology is there... Any thoughts?

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2008-02-27 19:41:09

#2

FallenMorgan: Member; +53|6342|Glendale, CA

We're fucked...

2008-02-27 19:44:35

#3

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6873|The Land of Scott Walker

Me thinks AI expert is a Matrix fan ...

2008-02-27 19:45:30

#4

13rin: Member; +977|6907

https://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y241/DBBrinson/ProofofSpyware.jpg

I can't help but feel a bit violated.....

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2008-02-27 19:49:10

#5

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

Aww, come on...dont't they look so innocent?

https://www.wildaboutmovies.com/images_5/Terminator.jpg

2008-02-27 19:49:35

#6

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6873|The Land of Scott Walker

Wat. You don't like GnR?

2008-02-27 19:53:18

#7

tkoi: Utahraptor!; +148|6575|Texas

DBBrinson1 wrote:
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y241/D … pyware.jpg

I can't help but feel a bit violated.....

wat

2008-02-27 19:58:11

#8

13rin: Member; +977|6907

Poseidon wrote:
Aww, come on...dont't they look so innocent?

http://www.wildaboutmovies.com/images_5/Terminator.jpg

I personally like the one from T3. Smart liquid metal shit.. Then Star Trek deep space 9 ripped em off with that shape shifting sheriff.. um.. *cough.

But I could see a system tweaking out on all that moves until its ammo/power runs out, but then what?

GG the comment was about a "coincidence" of advertisement banner on the bottom to the reference of the song in my post.

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-02-27 19:59:30)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2008-02-28 02:34:48

#9

B.Schuss: I'm back, baby... ( sort of ); +664|7269|Cologne, Germany

to me, machines should never be involved in a decision about the life or death of a human being, much less being the only ones taking it.

2008-02-28 02:38:51

#10

twiistaaa: Member; +87|7096|mexico

https://www.buddytv.com/articles/the-sarah-connor-chronicles/image/summer-glau.jpg

i fucking hope so.

2008-02-28 02:39:28

#11

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7238|Nårvei

B.Schuss wrote:
to me, machines should never be involved in a decision about the life or death of a human being, much less being the only ones taking it.

Not even for medical purposes ?

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2008-02-28 04:05:07

#12

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6839|'Murka

B.Schuss wrote:
to me, machines should never be involved in a decision about the life or death of a human being, much less being the only ones taking it.

Then you should be happy....because they're not.

And I agree with twistaaa.

Last edited by FEOS (2008-02-28 04:05:45)

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2008-02-28 04:33:48

#13

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6650|Escea

Will they be like the Daleks and be completely incapacitated by stairs? If these killer robots are as smart as some I've seen, we'll be alright. Believe me a Vacbot that's thwarted by a strategically place pot plant doesn't really scare me .

2008-02-28 05:12:02

#14

B.Schuss: I'm back, baby... ( sort of ); +664|7269|Cologne, Germany

Varegg wrote:
B.Schuss wrote:
to me, machines should never be involved in a decision about the life or death of a human being, much less being the only ones taking it.
Not even for medical purposes ?

example ?

2008-02-28 05:27:46

#15

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6650|Escea

B.Schuss wrote:
Varegg wrote:
B.Schuss wrote:
to me, machines should never be involved in a decision about the life or death of a human being, much less being the only ones taking it.
Not even for medical purposes ?
example ?

Jumbo enema

2008-02-28 06:44:03

#16

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7049|London, England

I agree, a fair enough about having un-manned vehicles and such, but for a robot to make the decision as to whether or not to pull the trigger. That's going too far.

2008-02-28 19:34:23

#17

motherdear: Member; +25|7079|Denmark/Minnesota (depends)

after my opinion this is all the fault of all the fucking weak ass liberals that are terrified of the least human loss not saying that it's a good thing that people die but i rather have a "real" army to fight for my country.

i wish we just wish the west had some balls and grew up and realised that soldiers are paid to put their life on the line and that they know the risk and are not supposed to be looked at as kids in a daycare.

and i by no means that believe that a soldiers life is not worth very much but we have become very soft in regards of our loss of combatants especially the unit loss ratio is pretty darn good in iraq in this war.

2008-02-28 21:25:28

#18

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|7102|Canberra, AUS

motherdear wrote:
after my opinion this is all the fault of all the fucking weak ass liberals that are terrified of the least human loss not saying that it's a good thing that people die but i rather have a "real" army to fight for my country.

i wish we just wish the west had some balls and grew up and realised that soldiers are paid to put their life on the line and that they know the risk and are not supposed to be looked at as kids in a daycare.

and i by no means that believe that a soldiers life is not worth very much but we have become very soft in regards of our loss of combatants especially the unit loss ratio is pretty darn good in iraq in this war.

Uhhh... you're being sarcastic, right?

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2008-02-28 23:28:27

#19

B.Schuss: I'm back, baby... ( sort of ); +664|7269|Cologne, Germany

denmark sure has changed...

2008-02-28 23:33:06

#20

Major.League.Infidel: Make Love and War; +303|6906|Communist Republic of CA, USA

Those three autonomous robots that went to Iraq never fired a shot, and would only have done so with a Human at the controls. Modern UCGVs are all controlled by people. All they do is prevent someone from getting shot. Granted, nothing will replace Boots on the ground, but if a robot can save a US soldier's life, I'm down.

2008-02-29 09:27:33

#21

topal63: . . .; +533|7146

Artificial intelligence doesn't really exist. It's a misnomer of sorts. It is a simulation of human thinking and nothing more. There isn't an adequate Turing-test in existence to suggest real consciousness is remotely possible in code on a CISC chip. Autonomous self-replicating conscious silicon will most likely never happen. Anything we create that seems less dumb than the last robot - will have a technological shelf life, will be programmed by people, will only marginally exceed the initial programming in terms of learning, will need to be maintained/serviced by people, etc.

Any robot we create is just a tool, like a hammer is a tool, or a gun is a tool (as in - a killing tool), or a paint-brush and so on. They're an extension of the human mind and the human populous. They're opposable-thumb/mind extensions.

I like tools: hammers, computers, paint-brushes, robots...

2008-02-29 09:31:11

#22

naightknifar: Served and Out; +642|6989|Southampton, UK

M.O.A.B wrote:
B.Schuss wrote:
Varegg wrote:

Not even for medical purposes ?
example ?
Jumbo enema

Only you. x

2008-02-29 13:38:29

#23

the_hitman_kills: Agent 47 wannabe; +32|6893|Inside my APC

twiistaaa wrote:
http://www.buddytv.com/articles/the-sar … r-glau.jpg

i fucking hope so.

Is she Fully functional

BF2S Forums Is this realistic? Terminator Scenario Baby!

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

Varegg wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

Varegg wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

motherdear wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

Varegg wrote:

twiistaaa wrote:

Board footer