dimascurtu
Member
+5|6339
"anyway....your point was a joke to try to indirectly point a finger at the US for killing children. Do you realize that we also give money to the Palestinian leadership so I guess the US is to blame for killing Israeli children too."

all im saying is that its a very complicated story. and yes. youre right in your arguments. and i agree with them. although it seems like the US is giving money to everyone, worrying about everything in the world, but, unfortunatly, they cant seem to fix the problems on their on soil.. but thats a new discussion altogether.
DeathBecomesYu
Member
+171|6607

dimascurtu wrote:

"anyway....your point was a joke to try to indirectly point a finger at the US for killing children. Do you realize that we also give money to the Palestinian leadership so I guess the US is to blame for killing Israeli children too."

all im saying is that its a very complicated story. and yes. youre right in your arguments. and i agree with them. although it seems like the US is giving money to everyone, worrying about everything in the world, but, unfortunatly, they cant seem to fix the problems on their on soil.. but thats a new discussion altogether.
Actually, I totally agree with you as well with our government sending money everywhere else. Can you imagine if the money sent overseas was used back home to help clear up this credit mess. Each family could get a lot more money back than they are offering right now. Yes, our government needs to clean itself up and get back to working for its people and as far as the OP....well, Israel and Palestinians need to clean up their act as well and stop acting like a bunch of fanatics. Do what is right for your people and try to get along for once. The constant cycle that these two societies do everyday is moronic.

The OP is just too one sided and focuses way to much on one side. Any death of any child no matter what side does it, accidentally or not is a crime when simply sitting down at the table and working this out wouldn't kill anyone. How many kids would get killed sitting at a negotiation table? The OP is just too biased and doesn't take the time to lay blame where it should be laid.....BOTH SIDES!

Last edited by DeathBecomesYu (2008-02-28 17:02:47)

SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6914|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)
I hate to sound cold, but it seems like every time Israel hit something in Palestine, it always seems like civilians get killed. I don't doubt that some do , but every time? This sounds like creative journalism. i.e. reports being doctored to say children are hit.

During WW2 the Nazi's used to put ammo dumps by hospitals and civilian buildings. It almost sounds like this is going on their. If Israel cared so little about civilians, then why don't they just level Palestine and be done with it?

It is a cold fact that civilians do die in conflicts, but one thing that does need to stop is the launching of attacks from Hamas controlled areas.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

IRONCHEF wrote:

No, Israel/USA does NOT care if children are targeted or accidentally killed.  Palestinians mean less than nothing to our leaders, sadly.
You need to go fight in a warzone ASAP.

/video game forum
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7028|132 and Bush

We knew this was coming.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=91272
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=91096


I wonder if these rocket attacks are coming from any of the freed Palestinian prisoners.. hmm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle … 918936.stm


https://i27.tinypic.com/s25w7m.jpg
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle … 181658.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle … 182363.stm

This is what happens when you try to bring peace to the cradle of civilization.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6914|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

usmarine wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

No, Israel/USA does NOT care if children are targeted or accidentally killed.  Palestinians mean less than nothing to our leaders, sadly.
You need to go fight in a warzone ASAP.

/video game forum
Every time we had to fire on a vehicle in Iraq, there was a full investigation into it. Everything we did, we had to take into account the civilian populace. We didn't just go around whacking people for the fun of it.

Come on Chef, please don't go their.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7077

usmarine wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

No, Israel/USA does NOT care if children are targeted or accidentally killed.  Palestinians mean less than nothing to our leaders, sadly.
You need to go fight in a warzone ASAP.

/video game forum
You need to go lead a country ASAP. He didn't say anything about whether the troops cared or not.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

ghettoperson wrote:

usmarine wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

No, Israel/USA does NOT care if children are targeted or accidentally killed.  Palestinians mean less than nothing to our leaders, sadly.
You need to go fight in a warzone ASAP.

/video game forum
You need to go lead a country ASAP. He didn't say anything about whether the troops cared or not.
Yes but the policy comes down from the higher ups.  Think about it for a second ffs.
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6342|Glendale, CA
Children die all the time in war, it's called collateral damage, it happens.  Napalm killed a whole bunch of innocent people in WWII, 'Nam, etc.
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7074

SgtHeihn wrote:

usmarine wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

No, Israel/USA does NOT care if children are targeted or accidentally killed.  Palestinians mean less than nothing to our leaders, sadly.
You need to go fight in a warzone ASAP.

/video game forum
Every time we had to fire on a vehicle in Iraq, there was a full investigation into it. Everything we did, we had to take into account the civilian populace. We didn't just go around whacking people for the fun of it.

Come on Chef, please don't go their.
One of the many perks of the internet PR age.
DeathBecomesYu
Member
+171|6607

FallenMorgan wrote:

Children die all the time in war, it's called collateral damage, it happens.  Napalm killed a whole bunch of innocent people in WWII, 'Nam, etc.
Most people understand this but according to Braddock only Israel does it.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6809|the land of bourbon

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

FallenMorgan wrote:

Children die all the time in war, it's called collateral damage, it happens.  Napalm killed a whole bunch of innocent people in WWII, 'Nam, etc.
Most people understand this but according to Braddock only Israel does it.
exactly.  i mean, napalm was really effective, so why did we stop using it?  oh because of the innocent deaths.  i keep trying to point out that we spend a siginifcant amount of money on weapon guidance systems, and a ground war with troops.  we could easily, and at a much lower cost, carpet bomb any threats we wanted.  but we dont, because we want to avoid civilian deaths.  face it braddock, you're just wrong.


and i still think u posted this just to get a reaction.

Last edited by steelie34 (2008-02-28 18:37:37)

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
dimascurtu
Member
+5|6339
"we spend a siginifcant amount of money on weapon guidance systems"

i wish those things actually made it to battlefield 2
PureFodder
Member
+225|6713
Deaths from Israeli/Palesinian coflict from OCHoPT. Figures in brackets are under 18s

Year     Palestinian deaths   Israeli deaths   

2005     216 (52)                     48 (6) 
2006     678 (127)                   25 (2) 
2007     396 (43)                     13 (0)

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening. US media coverage has been endlessly denounced across the entire world as being unbelievably biased towards Israel. Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media. Remember that the Palestinians are living in what has been described by Israelis as the worlds largest and most overcrowded prison. They are denied basic human rights and have put up with it for decades without significant violence. Having been utterly shat upon for over 40 years with any hope of a realistic solutions being endlessly blocked by the world superpower they are obviously giving up any hope and resorting to fighting back. If you were living under a 40 year brutal military occupation what would you do? Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7189

PureFodder wrote:

Deaths from Israeli/Palesinian coflict from OCHoPT. Figures in brackets are under 18s

Year     Palestinian deaths   Israeli deaths   

2005     216 (52)                     48 (6) 
2006     678 (127)                   25 (2) 
2007     396 (43)                     13 (0)

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening. US media coverage has been endlessly denounced across the entire world as being unbelievably biased towards Israel. Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media. Remember that the Palestinians are living in what has been described by Israelis as the worlds largest and most overcrowded prison. They are denied basic human rights and have put up with it for decades without significant violence. Having been utterly shat upon for over 40 years with any hope of a realistic solutions being endlessly blocked by the world superpower they are obviously giving up any hope and resorting to fighting back. If you were living under a 40 year brutal military occupation what would you do? Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
where are those stats from?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7028|132 and Bush

PureFodder wrote:

Deaths from Israeli/Palesinian coflict from OCHoPT. Figures in brackets are under 18s

Year     Palestinian deaths   Israeli deaths   

2005     216 (52)                     48 (6) 
2006     678 (127)                   25 (2) 
2007     396 (43)                     13 (0)

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening. US media coverage has been endlessly denounced across the entire world as being unbelievably biased towards Israel. Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media. Remember that the Palestinians are living in what has been described by Israelis as the worlds largest and most overcrowded prison. They are denied basic human rights and have put up with it for decades without significant violence. Having been utterly shat upon for over 40 years with any hope of a realistic solutions being endlessly blocked by the world superpower they are obviously giving up any hope and resorting to fighting back. If you were living under a 40 year brutal military occupation what would you do? Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
Here's a newsflash. Every bit of media coverage you get we most likely get as well. Welcome to the internet. Come on in and take a seat.

Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media.
Seriously?

Take a look at what you wrote and think about it:

PureFodder wrote:

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening.

PureFodder wrote:

Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA
It is funny how no one will acknowledge the significant difference between the unfortunate and inevitable deaths of civilians during war, and the deliberate targeting of them and use of them as shields.

Of course by doing so, would leave the Palestinians in a pretty piss poor and indefensible light, so we simple will not talk about or acknowledge this detail will we?
san4
The Mas
+311|7116|NYC, a place to live

PureFodder wrote:

Deaths from Israeli/Palesinian coflict from OCHoPT. Figures in brackets are under 18s

Year     Palestinian deaths   Israeli deaths   

2005     216 (52)                     48 (6) 
2006     678 (127)                   25 (2) 
2007     396 (43)                     13 (0)

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening. US media coverage has been endlessly denounced across the entire world as being unbelievably biased towards Israel. Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media. Remember that the Palestinians are living in what has been described by Israelis as the worlds largest and most overcrowded prison. They are denied basic human rights and have put up with it for decades without significant violence. Having been utterly shat upon for over 40 years with any hope of a realistic solutions being endlessly blocked by the world superpower they are obviously giving up any hope and resorting to fighting back. If you were living under a 40 year brutal military occupation what would you do? Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
If only the Israelis would accept a two-state solution.
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7134
First of all, they were not "babies", if that means anything.  Second of all, it's called collateral damage.  They did not target these children; their deaths were just an unfortunate accident.  Palestinian hate groups have pledged to genocide the Israelites.  The Israelites are fighting for their very existence.  If they happen to kill a few civilians preventing themselves from being attacked, then too bad.  These things are all part of war;  War sucks get over it.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

san4 wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Deaths from Israeli/Palesinian coflict from OCHoPT. Figures in brackets are under 18s

Year     Palestinian deaths   Israeli deaths   

2005     216 (52)                     48 (6) 
2006     678 (127)                   25 (2) 
2007     396 (43)                     13 (0)

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening. US media coverage has been endlessly denounced across the entire world as being unbelievably biased towards Israel. Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media. Remember that the Palestinians are living in what has been described by Israelis as the worlds largest and most overcrowded prison. They are denied basic human rights and have put up with it for decades without significant violence. Having been utterly shat upon for over 40 years with any hope of a realistic solutions being endlessly blocked by the world superpower they are obviously giving up any hope and resorting to fighting back. If you were living under a 40 year brutal military occupation what would you do? Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
If only the Israelis would accept a two-state solution.
Yeah, as if the rest of the Arab and Islamic world would simply leave Israel alone then huh?/

Just what would your defense of the constant bombardment of Israel be, after Israel stipulates?
SealXo
Member
+309|6963

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

SealXo wrote:

shit happens
If I was that childs father I'd hunt you down for a comment like that.
its fucking war. shit like that happens on massive scales throughout the history of war
its a mistake- shit happens - atleast it wasnt done on purpose.

i mean look at world war 2...

Last edited by SealXo (2008-02-28 19:45:54)

Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7134

lowing wrote:

It is funny how no one will acknowledge the significant difference between the unfortunate and inevitable deaths of civilians during war, and the deliberate targeting of them and use of them as shields.

Of course by doing so, would leave the Palestinians in a pretty piss poor and indefensible light, so we simple will not talk about or acknowledge this detail will we?
Apparently not
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7028|132 and Bush

san4 wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Deaths from Israeli/Palesinian coflict from OCHoPT. Figures in brackets are under 18s

Year     Palestinian deaths   Israeli deaths   

2005     216 (52)                     48 (6) 
2006     678 (127)                   25 (2) 
2007     396 (43)                     13 (0)

Anyone who thinks this conflict is equally going in either direction has no idea about what's happening. US media coverage has been endlessly denounced across the entire world as being unbelievably biased towards Israel. Israeli media is less pro-Israel than US media. Remember that the Palestinians are living in what has been described by Israelis as the worlds largest and most overcrowded prison. They are denied basic human rights and have put up with it for decades without significant violence. Having been utterly shat upon for over 40 years with any hope of a realistic solutions being endlessly blocked by the world superpower they are obviously giving up any hope and resorting to fighting back. If you were living under a 40 year brutal military occupation what would you do? Their attacks, especially on civillian targets are utterly reprehensable, but every day of the military occupation and apartheid inflicted on the Palestinians is utterly reprehensable too.
If only the Israelis would accept a two-state solution.
They have... Talk to Hamas. This retaliation came after Hamas Fired 40 rockets into southern Israel. The Palestinians worst enemy is Hamas. There is a reason this shit is happening in Gaza.

Supporting them still.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/id … 3920080222
http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id … tinian_aid
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5htM … 75fmFw5gSw
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7134

IRONCHEF wrote:

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

UGHHH.....Here is exactly what you posted:

"I didn't say they purposefully target them, BUT I HAVE NO DOUBT IT'S BEEN DONE!"

YOU READ...you say exactly that so how am I supposed to think you mean something else. You believe that children have been targeted!
Again, if you read my following comments, I made it clear that publicly, Israel/USA does not target children.  That is a whole lot of difference between what goes on on the ground.  If you're in a humvee rolling through hostile neighborhoods in Iraq, and you have a standing order to shoot people standing in front of your vehicle, or at vehicles pulling in front of or blocking you, or even approaching you from behind, does it take a genius to realize that said soldier probably won't go get some binoculars out and verify the occupants of the vehicles before unleashing some 50 cal on them?

I do frequent a liberal blog (a couple actually) and since March 2003 I've seen the pictures, seen the clips, seen the news that didn't get wide acclaim.  it's not a secret that children have been targeted directly or indirectly, on purpose or accidentally.  I would bet from some military members of this board that in the real hot areas they've been given standing orders to shoot "anything" in their way.  And yes, because enemies use children, animals, women, etc for bombs, this makes such orders possible.

And please don't make me whip out the Ava videos...

So yes, I have no doubt that children have been targeted by Israelis and Americans.  Doesn't mean it's official, public policy, but it's been done..either ordered or individual decision by someone over the edge or passed feeling.  I think some here would say "war is hell" for a reason.
So, how is that of any relevance?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7028|132 and Bush

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

UGHHH.....Here is exactly what you posted:

"I didn't say they purposefully target them, BUT I HAVE NO DOUBT IT'S BEEN DONE!"

YOU READ...you say exactly that so how am I supposed to think you mean something else. You believe that children have been targeted!
Again, if you read my following comments, I made it clear that publicly, Israel/USA does not target children.  That is a whole lot of difference between what goes on on the ground.  If you're in a humvee rolling through hostile neighborhoods in Iraq, and you have a standing order to shoot people standing in front of your vehicle, or at vehicles pulling in front of or blocking you, or even approaching you from behind, does it take a genius to realize that said soldier probably won't go get some binoculars out and verify the occupants of the vehicles before unleashing some 50 cal on them?

I do frequent a liberal blog (a couple actually) and since March 2003 I've seen the pictures, seen the clips, seen the news that didn't get wide acclaim.  it's not a secret that children have been targeted directly or indirectly, on purpose or accidentally.  I would bet from some military members of this board that in the real hot areas they've been given standing orders to shoot "anything" in their way.  And yes, because enemies use children, animals, women, etc for bombs, this makes such orders possible.

And please don't make me whip out the Ava videos...

So yes, I have no doubt that children have been targeted by Israelis and Americans.  Doesn't mean it's official, public policy, but it's been done..either ordered or individual decision by someone over the edge or passed feeling.  I think some here would say "war is hell" for a reason.
So, how is that of any relevance?
They target their own children as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_suic … n_conflict

https://i25.tinypic.com/2rnanaw.jpg
Xbone Stormsurgezz

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard