ron paul received 14.7 percent of the votes in travis county. lol
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-03-05 09:59:08)
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-03-05 09:59:08)
Reports say ~35% of Republicans voted in the Democratic Primaries. If you don't see why we voted for Hillary, you're blind. Call it the "Limbaugh Effect".Mek-Izzle wrote:
Damn, Texas actually voted for Hillary. So much for "Don't mess with Texas" and "We're bigger than France" and all that macho shit. You all suck
Well that's abit lame, I thought only people who registered with the party would be able to vote for the primary of said party{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Reports say ~35% of Republicans voted in the Democratic Primaries. If you don't see why we voted for Hillary, you're blind. Call it the "Limbaugh Effect".Mek-Izzle wrote:
Damn, Texas actually voted for Hillary. So much for "Don't mess with Texas" and "We're bigger than France" and all that macho shit. You all suck
Open primaries in Texas. You can vote for whoever you want to vote for.Mek-Izzle wrote:
Well that's abit lame, I thought only people who registered with the party would be able to vote for the primary of said party{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Reports say ~35% of Republicans voted in the Democratic Primaries. If you don't see why we voted for Hillary, you're blind. Call it the "Limbaugh Effect".Mek-Izzle wrote:
Damn, Texas actually voted for Hillary. So much for "Don't mess with Texas" and "We're bigger than France" and all that macho shit. You all suck
Fail.{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
She netted 8 delegates after those 3 wins.
What? The Democratic Party's proportional delegate rules?HurricaИe wrote:
Fail.{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
She netted 8 delegates after those 3 wins.
Kerry --GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I received, an email from the obama campaign saying something like 4. If you're interested, Ill paste it up.
you win.Kmarion wrote:
Kerry --GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I received, an email from the obama campaign saying something like 4. If you're interested, Ill paste it up.
Our projections show the most likely outcome of yesterday's elections will be that Hillary Clinton gained 187 delegates, and we gained 183.
That's a net gain of 4 delegates out of more than 370 delegates available from all the states that voted.
For comparison, that's less than half our net gain of 9 delegates from the District of Columbia alone. It's also less than our net gain of 8 from Nebraska, or 12 from Washington State. And it's considerably less than our net gain of 33 delegates from Georgia.
The task for the Clinton campaign yesterday was clear. In order to have a plausible path to the nomination, they needed to score huge delegate victories and cut into our lead.
They failed.
It's clear, though, that Senator Clinton wants to continue an increasingly desperate, increasingly negative -- and increasingly expensive -- campaign to tear us down.
That's her decision. But it's not stopping John McCain, who clinched the Republican nomination last night, from going on the offensive. He's already made news attacking Barack, and that will only become more frequent in the coming days.
Right now, it's essential for every single supporter of Barack Obama to step up and help fight this two-front battle. In the face of attacks from Hillary Clinton and John McCain, we need to be ready to take them on.
Will you make an online donation of $25 right now?
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
The chatter among pundits may have gotten better for the Clinton campaign after last night, but by failing to cut into our lead, the math -- and their chances of winning -- got considerably worse.
Today, we still have a lead of more than 150 delegates, and there are only 611 pledged delegates left to win in the upcoming contests.
By a week from today, we will have competed in Wyoming and Mississippi. Two more states and 45 more delegates will be off the table.
But if Senator Clinton wants to continue this, let's show that we're ready.
Make an online donation of $25 now to show you're willing to fight for this:
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
This nomination process is an opportunity to decide what our party needs to stand for in this election.
We can either take on John McCain with a candidate who's already united Republicans and Independents against us, or we can do it with a campaign that's united Americans from all parties around a common purpose.
We can debate John McCain about who can clean up Washington by nominating a candidate who's taken more money from lobbyists than he has, or we can do it with a campaign that hasn't taken a dime of their money because we've been funded by you.
We can present the American people with a candidate who stood shoulder-to-shoulder with McCain on the worst foreign policy disaster of our generation, and agrees with him that George Bush deserves the benefit of the doubt on Iran, or we can nominate someone who opposed the war in Iraq from the beginning and will not support a march to war with Iran.
John McCain may have a long history of straight talk and independent thinking, but he has made the decision in this campaign to offer four more years of the very same policies that have failed us for the last eight.
We need a Democratic candidate who will present the starkest contrast to those failed policies of the past.
And that candidate is Barack Obama.
Please make a donation of $25 now:
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Thank you,
David
David Plouffe
Campaign Manager
Obama for America
http://www.redlasso.com/ClipPlayer.aspx … 7c4000e7ca
Lol, three donation links in the same email.Will you make an online donation of $25 right now?
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Make an online donation of $25 now to show you're willing to fight for this:
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Please make a donation of $25 now:
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Tax deductible.{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Lol, three donation links in the same email.Will you make an online donation of $25 right now?
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Make an online donation of $25 now to show you're willing to fight for this:
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Please make a donation of $25 now:
https://donate.barackobama.com/math
Anyways, I can't wait for Obama to start throwing mud back so his "high and mighty" image is torn down.
Secretly, David P. is an Obama campaigner... j/kKmarion wrote:
David Plouffe = Spammer ..lol
Meh ... he was supposed to win it, and merely picked up 2-3 net delegates ... I don't see momentum going one way or the other. Hillary pretty much stopped the Obama momentum with her wins last week, and right now the momentum is just stagnant.Kmarion wrote:
Obama won WY. There weren't a lot of delegates at stake but everything counts when it's this close.
Another Win
The Mo swings back to B.O.
At the very least it indicates the momentum is not shifting (either way). It has been a long time since we have had a night where Hillary came out with more delegates.OrangeHound wrote:
Meh ... he was supposed to win it, and merely picked up 2-3 net delegates ... I don't see momentum going one way or the other. Hillary pretty much stopped the Obama momentum with her wins last week, and right now the momentum is just stagnant.Kmarion wrote:
Obama won WY. There weren't a lot of delegates at stake but everything counts when it's this close.
Another Win
The Mo swings back to B.O.
Of course, delegate math still favors Obama ... he wins if things are "just stagnant." Hillary has to have a significant momentum swing her way in order to win.
At this point, they need to include those two states ... but, I think there are a lot of logistical issues. And, there is no way that the results as they stand now would be accepted.Spearhead wrote:
Did you guys hear what Hillary said when they were talking about having FL and Michigan redo their primaries? She said she would "not accept" a Michigan caucus.
Hmm I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that she lost the last 13.
They are talking about sending us ballots in the mail. Both candidates have said they will go along with what the party decides.OrangeHound wrote:
At this point, they need to include those two states ... but, I think there are a lot of logistical issues. And, there is no way that the results as they stand now would be accepted.Spearhead wrote:
Did you guys hear what Hillary said when they were talking about having FL and Michigan redo their primaries? She said she would "not accept" a Michigan caucus.
Hmm I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that she lost the last 13.
Obama will fight this however, since the demographics in both states heavily favor Hillary.