TimmmmaaaaH
Damn, I... had something for this
+725|6920|Brisbane, Australia

Vub wrote:

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

phd_in_destruction wrote:


I guess what I meant was, no gravity means 'no getting pulled apart' by conflicting forces.
Ah, that makes sense then

I don't know where the whole "getting pulled apart by forces" came from really - if that were true, wouldnt the planet rip itself apart?
In physics, if you take volume integrals, you'll realise that the forces exerted by gravitation by the matter around you at the centre of the earth exactly balance, so there is no net force on you, it'll mean you won't tend towards any one direction. You won't get pulled apart at all because there is no net force on any iota of matter that makes up you.

Oh and you'll die from the temperature and pressure and the lack of oxygen long before you reach the centre of the earth
Yes, I know that, thats why I asked where the whole being pulled apart thing came from.

You can explain it better than me though
https://bf3s.com/sigs/5e6a35c97adb20771c7b713312c0307c23a7a36a.png
loubot
O' HAL naw!
+470|7059|Columbus, OH
I can't speculate on what might happen but I know what I would do once I arrived at the core. Post another "Creme Pied" topic on BF2s with my wireless laptop
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|7046|Area 51

loubot wrote:

I can't speculate on what might happen but I know what I would do once I arrived at the core. Post another "Creme Pied" topic on BF2s with my wireless laptop
Make sure to cover in the invisible spray thingy else it might get crushed or something
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7102|London, England

loubot wrote:

I can't speculate on what might happen but I know what I would do once I arrived at the core. Post another "Creme Pied" topic on BF2s with my wireless laptop
Another MISLEADING "Cream Pied" topic no doubt.

Not that I'm into that sort of thing

Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-03-06 04:58:52)

bennisboy
Member
+829|7127|Poundland

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

geNius wrote:

Torn?  You mean crushed?
Truth.

psHlite you douche, you obviously don't understand gravity at all

The immense pressure from the entire mass of the earth pushing down (or up? /mindfuck) on you would crush you instantly. 5.97x1027kg if I remember correctly.
Actually the gravitational pull from the mass of the earth would most likely be acting outwards, due to the mass being around you, but then the force between the mass of the earth itself would be causing and inward force (on the earth) as well

Last edited by bennisboy (2008-03-06 05:07:49)

StormEye
Sniper
+50|7126|Malibu
Man... you guys are thinking too hard. You won't be killed instantly due to

'spray-on film which protects you from anything and everything'

BUT no extra oxygen.

Can you survive without oxygen?
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7102|London, England
The question is asking more of what is at the center of the earth in relation to gravity and pressure, rather than can a living organism survive there

In other words, it's best we find out what's happening at the center of mass before we talk about trivial things like there's no Oxygen etc..

Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-03-06 05:11:05)

thepilot91
Member
+64|6717|Åland!

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

geNius wrote:

Torn?  You mean crushed?
Truth.

psHlite you douche, you obviously don't understand gravity at all

The immense pressure from the entire mass of the earth pushing down (or up? /mindfuck) on you would crush you instantly. 5.97x1027kg if I remember correctly.
yeah so with other words you would with your invinsiblespray be pretty much still...
Rubix-Cubes
Member
+123|7136|UK
this film explains it
kptk92
u
+972|6889|tc_london
I'd turn into that Flame dude from the Fantastic Four, and just chill there
t05h
Member
+2|6775
Unobtainium roolz
ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|7003
where are all of the good threads these days?

step your game up bitches...
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7102|London, England

ig wrote:

where are all of the good threads these days?

step your game up bitches...
we need another _Can I get a Fuck You_ thread
bennisboy
Member
+829|7127|Poundland

ig wrote:

where are all of the good threads these days?

step your game up bitches...
Ever since the rap MC thread died
jord
Member
+2,382|7159|The North, beyond the wall.
You'd do something so mind bogglingly awesome any attempt to explain it would destroy the universe.
bennisboy
Member
+829|7127|Poundland

jord wrote:

You'd do something so mind bogglingly awesome any attempt to explain it would destroy the universe.
N it goes a little something like this:

https://www.spacescan.org/images/black-hole.jpg
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|6927|Amsterdam‫
the donlad duck gives the awnser
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/donald.jpg

Last edited by menzo2003 (2008-03-06 10:31:40)

https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
kptk92
u
+972|6889|tc_london

menzo2003 wrote:

the donlad duck gives the awnser
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … donald.jpg
I'm sorry, wat
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6972|Northern California
My guess is that nothing would happen.  I'm guessing you're all thinking the gravity would crush you?  Well, if I'm not mistaken, the various layers (outer core & beyond) have metal in them that counters the magnetism of the inner core creating the magnetic field.  That magnetic field along with the density of the core are what create gravity, right?  So at the core, there probably wouldn't be crushing gravity i think.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7102|London, England

IRONCHEF wrote:

My guess is that nothing would happen.  I'm guessing you're all thinking the gravity would crush you?  Well, if I'm not mistaken, the various layers (outer core & beyond) have metal in them that counters the magnetism of the inner core creating the magnetic field.  That magnetic field along with the density of the core are what create gravity, right?  So at the core, there probably wouldn't be crushing gravity i think.
The magnetic field doesn't cause gravity. It's just the sheer mass that does, and it all points towards the center of the total mass. The moon and many other large bodies have no magnetic field, yet it still have gravitational pull.

I don't understand gravity tbh, or where it comes from. It's just a natural phenomenon that exists on all masses (but is only really noticeable on large masses aka planets/stars)

Astrophysics was so fun. I forgot most of it now though. That was like more than a year ago. Unit 3 Physics AS

Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-03-06 10:42:34)

jimmanycricket
EBC Member
+56|7136|Cambridge, England
If the middle was hollowed out and had low pressure, you would be weightless, if your center of mass was at the the earths center of mass. If your center of mass was off the earths center of mass you would fall the side you are closest too. You would feel almost perfectly weightless if the hollowed out part was reasonably small.

Of course this is stupid because the middle isn't hollow and you would instead be crushed by the pressure. Not to mention the heat.
FlemishHCmaniac
Member
+147|6893|Belgium

kptk92 wrote:

menzo2003 wrote:

the donlad duck gives the awnser
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … donald.jpg
I'm sorry, wat
Donald: but in the meantime I'm enjoying the fact that I'm standing where there is no east, west, north, south or down. Every direction is upwards.
Old guy: I really don't understand what you are saying. Stop talking upside down!
Graphic-J
The Artist formerly known as GraphicArtist-J
+196|6607|So Cal
You'd enter in Earth's anus. Nobody want's to go there....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....... unless earth was a super model with a plump ass...MMmmm buttseks.
https://i44.tinypic.com/28vg66s.jpg
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6611|North Tonawanda, NY

Mek-Izzle wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

My guess is that nothing would happen.  I'm guessing you're all thinking the gravity would crush you?  Well, if I'm not mistaken, the various layers (outer core & beyond) have metal in them that counters the magnetism of the inner core creating the magnetic field.  That magnetic field along with the density of the core are what create gravity, right?  So at the core, there probably wouldn't be crushing gravity i think.
The magnetic field doesn't cause gravity. It's just the sheer mass that does, and it all points towards the center of the total mass. The moon and many other large bodies have no magnetic field, yet it still have gravitational pull.

I don't understand gravity tbh, or where it comes from. It's just a natural phenomenon that exists on all masses (but is only really noticeable on large masses aka planets/stars)

Astrophysics was so fun. I forgot most of it now though. That was like more than a year ago. Unit 3 Physics AS
No one really knows.  Here is an interesting article.

Greatest Mysteries: What Causes Gravity? wrote:

In the deepest depths of space, gravity tugs on matter to form galaxies, stars, black holes and the like. In spite of its infinite reach, however, gravity is the wimpiest of all forces in the universe.

This weakness also makes it the most mysterious, as scientists can't measure it in the laboratory as easily as they can detect its effects on planets and stars. The repulsion between two positively charged protons, for example, is 10^36 times stronger than gravity's pull between them—that's 1 followed by 36 zeros less macho.

Physicists want to squeeze little old gravity into the standard model—the crown-jewel theory of modern physics that explains three other fundamental forces in physics—but none has succeeded. Like a runt at a pool party, gravity just doesn't fit in when using Einstein's theory of relativity, which explains gravity only on large scales

"Gravity is completely different from the other forces described by the standard model," said Mark Jackson, a theoretical physicist at Fermilab in Illinois. "When you do some calculations about small gravitational interactions, you get stupid answers. The math simply doesn't work."

Gremlins of gravity

The numbers may not jibe, but physicists have a hunch about gravity's unseen gremlins: Tiny, massless particles called gravitons that emanate gravitational fields.

Each hypothetical bit tugs on every piece of matter in the universe, as fast as the speed of light permits. Yet if they are so common in the universe, why haven't physicists found them?

"We can detect massless particles such as photons just fine, but gravitons elude us because they interact so weakly with matter," said Michael Turner, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago. "We simply don't know how to detect one."

Turner, however, isn't despondent about humanity's quest for gravitons. He thinks we'll eventually ensnare a few of the pesky particles hiding in the shadows of more easily detected particles.

"What it really comes down to is technology," Turner said.

Physicists aren't using mechanical wizardry to discover gravitons just yet, however. Efforts are currently focused on confirming the existence of the Higgs boson, which is the graviton's distant cousin particle responsible for giving matter mass.

Finding the 'toilet'

Sheldon Glashow, winner of the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics, once called the Higgs the "toilet" of the standard model of particle physics.

Turner explained that Glashow coined the term because the Higgs performs an essential function: Keeping the standard model functioning, at least in an intellectual way.

"Really, the Higgs is more like a plumber with duct tape, holding the standard model together," Turner said. "A lot of the inelegance of it's all wrapped up in the Higgs."

And rightly so, he noted, because it's required to make the other forces involving mass—such as gravity—make sense.

"At the same time, the Higgs can be frustrating because it doesn't shed much light on gravity," Turner said, assuming that the particle is eventually discovered.

Accelerating answers

Discovering elusive particles such as the Higgs is something like traveling through time. By using enormous machines to whiz particles close to the speed of light, then smash them together, engineers can mimic the incredible energies present during the early universe.

So early in the universe's existence, particles were too energetic to stick together and form more familiar protons, neutrons and the like.

The Tevatron, Fermilab's 4-mile-circumference (6.3-kilometer) particle accelerator, may have already spotted the Higgs in accelerator data, according to physicists' Web logs. But Turner said the new Large Hadron Collider (LHC) circling 17 miles (27 kilometers) beneath France and Switzerland should clearly confirm it within a few years.

"I think it will be a sigh of relief when the Higgs is discovered," he said. Will particle accelerators, however, eventually pop out a graviton?

Xavier Siemens, a gravitational theorist at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, said showing gravity acts like a wave needs to happen first.

"Classically, we can measure waves, and waves are made up of particles," said Siemens, who is also a member of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) that looks for wave-like evidence of gravity. By detecting gravitational waves, there would be grounds to suggest gravitons really exist—and begin seeking it out.

"At this point it seems like science fiction. Theoretically, however, we should be able to detect single gravitons," Siemens said. "But how is the big question."

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard