KORdaemon
Member
+2|6631
today on youtube I was watching some engineer videos and I noticed one comment that said that the 11-87 was actually a semi-automatic IRL.  being the kind of guy who shoots before realising i just shot my commander in the head I instantaneously gave the man a negative before proceeding to flame him for being an ignorant cow.  suddenly, right before I clicked 'post' a brick of realization cracked me across the skull and I had the amazing thought that maybe he was right so I deligently looked up the m11-87 on wikipedia and the googleverse.  Lo and behold, I found numerous sites and people who all claimed it was a semi auto.  Now I'm really confused, how in the name of god did the designers make such a huge mistake??

basically, in one sentence, is the M11-87 really a semi auto IRL?

ps: I realise there's a thread for random little nitpicky complaints like this one but I'm 99% sure that thread was just made so noobs like me would throw their thoughts in there for everyone else to ignore.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6973|Purplicious Wisconsin
Says the same thing in the world guns site too clicky. Well EA and Dice did get some things wrong with the game, like the fact that the Chinese don't use the ak47 anymore, yet it magically appears as the primary assault rifle of the PLA arsenal in the game.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6973|Purplicious Wisconsin
Should of had this shotgun for the USMC instead.
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/sh04-e.htm

Last edited by War Man (2008-03-06 18:29:44)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
fibtech
Member
+10|6534

War Man wrote:

Should of had this shotgun for the USMC instead.
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/sh04-e.htm
No, This one

RoosterCantrell
Goodbye :)
+399|6739|Somewhere else

fibtech wrote:

War Man wrote:

Should of had this shotgun for the USMC instead.
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/sh04-e.htm
No, This one

OH. DEAR. GOD.

I got chills watching that video.  I FUCKING WANT ONE!
kajukenbo_kid
Member
+36|6675|...
its bf2....

in bf2 you can fix gunshot wounds to the head with defibs, place explosives that can tell the difference between friend and foe, and crash jets into solid objects at full speed with no damage.  bf2 wasnt based on realism thats why its so great
jdno_7
Member
+10|6482

fibtech wrote:

War Man wrote:

Should of had this shotgun for the USMC instead.
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/sh04-e.htm
No, This one

that is one sweet shotgun!!
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6973|Purplicious Wisconsin

jdno_7 wrote:

fibtech wrote:

War Man wrote:

Should of had this shotgun for the USMC instead.
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/sh04-e.htm
No, This one

that is one sweet shotgun!!
I remember seeing that episode in future weapons, but it would be totally unfair for the other armies in bf2 if the USMC had it (maybe if it was an unlock).
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Bulletproof.inf
Member
+2|6412
most guns in BF2 look diffrent like try the G3 compare it to the 1 in CoD4 + the m16 looks a little diffrent from real life too
csmag
Member
+92|6707|Canada

Bulletproof.inf wrote:

most guns in BF2 look diffrent like try the G3 compare it to the 1 in CoD4 + the m16 looks a little diffrent from real life too
Most guns in Call of duty 4 are modeled slightly wrong.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard