sparklet
Banned
+34|7184|stop corecting my grammer!!!!!

jamesward0 wrote:

Esker wrote:

That's utter crap, my FX5600 used to run BF2 on low settings just fine...

A lot of those cards wouldn't have supported BF2 before the new patch heh. I can see someone running BF2 on full spec with an Intel 845 ha.
well you should mostly concentrate neat the top there accurate the radon 9200 particularly handekled bf2 really well and now because of the new patch thats 54,000 out of the game
a ATI 9200 ran the game bfor 1.2????
SHIT
then i wouldn't have spent $2000 + dollars on a brand new rig
its a pretty powerfull one too

1.5 GB of memeory
500 GB HD
AMD FX-57
^^^^
some of the best parts.........
and my GFX card is a nvidia 6600 runs every thing fine on meduim settings i get 40-50 FPS
still sucks for you
EDIT
my old PC had a P4 2.2 ghz aand 512 mb of ram and a ATI 9200

Last edited by sparklet (2006-02-19 08:52:52)

Esker
Member
+1|7164
Yeah but this survey was done in June 2005, if it's even real...

This survery has nothing to do with the new patch whatsoever. The top cards listed there are not only out of date but some of them are budget cards.

The problem was people who could play the game and now can't play game anymore, not people who couldn't play it in the first place.
jamesward0
Member
+0|7079

sgt_mango333 wrote:

Quit your whining!!!!  You bought a game you knew was going to stress every piece of hardware available at normal settings.  Now you have the balls to complain that your hardware is subpar and want the developers and publishers to give you your money back?  Say maybe I should get my money back from McDonalds because that burger didn't sit well with me.  Or maybe I should get my money back from Bill Gates, because the software has bugs.   Shut up all you whiners!!!   Play or leave - and I'm hoping for the latter so we can find the posts worth reading without having to muck through this crap!

This is a game, the best of its kind to date.  And all you can do is bitch and moan about how Dice and EA suck and aren't catering to your specific requests.  You want to play the latest and greatest on the PC you gotta upgrade, plain and simple.  If you can't afford it, I feel your pain...go get an xbox so the rest of us who love to play games - bugs and all - can do so without your whining in our ears.
its not an exact specification they put 700,000 peopel out of the game THATS ALOT OF PISSED OFF PEOPLE AND IT DIDNT STREACH MY HARDWEAR I COULD HAVE MY BROSER OPEN AND WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER WHILE STIL HAVINGA PING OF 18 thats not a stech and on the cover when you buy it,IT DID NT SAY WHAT WAS SUPPORTED,IT DID NT SAY IN 3 WEEKS TIME THEY WILL RELEASE PATCH 1.2 RNERING IT USELESS
Esker
Member
+1|7164

sparklet wrote:

jamesward0 wrote:

Esker wrote:

That's utter crap, my FX5600 used to run BF2 on low settings just fine...

A lot of those cards wouldn't have supported BF2 before the new patch heh. I can see someone running BF2 on full spec with an Intel 845 ha.
well you should mostly concentrate neat the top there accurate the radon 9200 particularly handekled bf2 really well and now because of the new patch thats 54,000 out of the game
a ATI 9200 ran the game bfor 1.2????
SHIT
then i wouldn't have spent $2000 dollars on a brand new rig
its a pretty powerfull one too

1.5 GB of memeory
500 GB HD
AMD FX-57
^^^^
some of the best parts.........
and my GFX card is a nvidia 6600 runs every thing fine on meduim settings i get 40-50 FPS
still sucks for you
You spent 2k on a system that has a mid ranged card?

ROFL, Sucks for you
jamesward0
Member
+0|7079

sparklet wrote:

jamesward0 wrote:

Esker wrote:

That's utter crap, my FX5600 used to run BF2 on low settings just fine...

A lot of those cards wouldn't have supported BF2 before the new patch heh. I can see someone running BF2 on full spec with an Intel 845 ha.
well you should mostly concentrate neat the top there accurate the radon 9200 particularly handekled bf2 really well and now because of the new patch thats 54,000 out of the game
a ATI 9200 ran the game bfor 1.2????
SHIT
then i wouldn't have spent $2000 + dollars on a brand new rig
its a pretty powerfull one too

1.5 GB of memeory
500 GB HD
AMD FX-57
^^^^
some of the best parts.........
and my GFX card is a nvidia 6600 runs every thing fine on meduim settings i get 40-50 FPS
still sucks for you
EDIT
my old PC had a P4 2.2 ghz aand 512 mb of ram and a ATI 9200
rofl you just installed it again for it to run on the 9200
sgt_mango333
Member
+31|7089
...and another thing - if you all frequent these forums regularly you will find many warnings against Radeon cards.  So if you have one or bought one...your problem.  Quit trying to make it mine by demanding your money back and jacking up the price of future releases because of your chuckleheadedness.

That's it, I'm done
sparklet
Banned
+34|7184|stop corecting my grammer!!!!!

jamesward0 wrote:

sgt_mango333 wrote:

Quit your whining!!!!  You bought a game you knew was going to stress every piece of hardware available at normal settings.  Now you have the balls to complain that your hardware is subpar and want the developers and publishers to give you your money back?  Say maybe I should get my money back from McDonalds because that burger didn't sit well with me.  Or maybe I should get my money back from Bill Gates, because the software has bugs.   Shut up all you whiners!!!   Play or leave - and I'm hoping for the latter so we can find the posts worth reading without having to muck through this crap!

This is a game, the best of its kind to date.  And all you can do is bitch and moan about how Dice and EA suck and aren't catering to your specific requests.  You want to play the latest and greatest on the PC you gotta upgrade, plain and simple.  If you can't afford it, I feel your pain...go get an xbox so the rest of us who love to play games - bugs and all - can do so without your whining in our ears.
its not an exact specification they put 700,000 peopel out of the game THATS ALOT OF PISSED OFF PEOPLE AND IT DIDNT STREACH MY HARDWEAR I COULD HAVE MY BROSER OPEN AND WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER WHILE STIL HAVINGA PING OF 18 thats not a stech and on the cover when you buy it,IT DID NT SAY WHAT WAS SUPPORTED,IT DID NT SAY IN 3 WEEKS TIME THEY WILL RELEASE PATCH 1.2 RNERING IT USELESS
LAW SUITE!!!!
on the box it said a ATI 8500 or higher so i was like ok my 9200 will be ok but when i tried to start it up it just crashed i got 3 days after it came out
so i waited a nother month to build a BRAND NEW PC boy if started playing when it came out i would prooly have TWICE as mucxh poiintsas i do now cuz it was summer and all i do is play games all day about 8 hours a day
*DuTcH*
Member
+0|7283
Who cares if u cant play BF2 go play cs 1.6 and leave us alone or just get a better pc.My pc is well over a year old and pisses through BF2 with high settings at 1280-1024 resolution.
Fx-53
6800gt AGP 445/1200
2 gig of geil ddr400 ram

Last edited by *DuTcH* (2006-02-19 08:58:04)

sgt_mango333
Member
+31|7089
BTW I'm running a AMD64 with 2Gb or RAM and a Geforce 6600 GT with 256Mb and I run at high with AA set at 2x.  This is stock hardware, no OCing.   Ping and videocards don't have crap to do with each other.
jamesward0
Member
+0|7079

sgt_mango333 wrote:

...and another thing - if you all frequent these forums regularly you will find many warnings against Radeon cards.  So if you have one or bought one...your problem.  Quit trying to make it mine by demanding your money back and jacking up the price of future releases because of your chuckleheadedness.

That's it, I'm done
my pychic powers tell me your american becuase of the crappy insult and i wa snever tring to make it your problem its ea's im just telling people that ea has cost people there hard earned money
B0BCAt®
Member
+0|7097
wow that date came from like JULY.  how do you feel about digging stuff up from like 8 monthes ago?
Cyberwolf
Banned
+14|7128

jamesward0 wrote:

BEHOLD THE LINK
http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=392503
A few simple words...Upgrade your shit box! Any retard using a GeForce 4 or Radeon 9200, 9500, etc aught to be dragged into the street and shot. Getting a decent video card these days doesn't break the bank. I'm sorry you can't play but jesus, the days of pong and tetris are over. Get some hardware that can handle it.
jamesward0
Member
+0|7079

*DuTcH* wrote:

Who cares if u cant play BF2 go play cs 1.6 and leave us alone or just get a better pc.My pc is well over a year old and pisses through BF2 with high settings at 1280-1024 resolution.
Fx-53
6800gt AGP 445/1200
2 gig of geil ddr400 ram
c.s sucks also no why should i? it worked before when i baught it it worked fine ea has made the product faulty and under the garentee provided by ea i can demeand my money back
Cyberwolf
Banned
+14|7128

sgt_mango333 wrote:

BTW I'm running a AMD64 with 2Gb or RAM and a Geforce 6600 GT with 256Mb and I run at high with AA set at 2x.  This is stock hardware, no OCing.   Ping and videocards don't have crap to do with each other.
Yes, Screen Lag & Connection Lag are unrelated. People assume they are related but they aren't. Some people experience lag based on the server they are connected too...Packet Loss, Latency Issues, Downloading Files in Background, Etc

Others experience lag based on not enough free system resources (too many background apps running during game play) or hardware that just can't handle the settings your using.
jamesward0
Member
+0|7079

Cyberwolf wrote:

jamesward0 wrote:

BEHOLD THE LINK
http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=392503
A few simple words...Upgrade your shit box! Any retard using a GeForce 4 or Radeon 9200, 9500, etc aught to be dragged into the street and shot. Getting a decent video card these days doesn't break the bank. I'm sorry you can't play but jesus, the days of pong and tetris are over. Get some hardware that can handle it.
the 9200 could handel it thats the point besides it does when your 13 dont have a job arnt able to get one paid £800 not a yaer ago for your current pc and a further 40 on the game
sparklet
Banned
+34|7184|stop corecting my grammer!!!!!

Esker wrote:

sparklet wrote:

jamesward0 wrote:


well you should mostly concentrate neat the top there accurate the radon 9200 particularly handekled bf2 really well and now because of the new patch thats 54,000 out of the game
a ATI 9200 ran the game bfor 1.2????
SHIT
then i wouldn't have spent $2000 dollars on a brand new rig
its a pretty powerfull one too

1.5 GB of memeory
500 GB HD
AMD FX-57
^^^^
some of the best parts.........
and my GFX card is a nvidia 6600 runs every thing fine on meduim settings i get 40-50 FPS
still sucks for you
You spent 2k on a system that has a mid ranged card?


ROFL, Sucks for you
im puting in SLI i got the other card on the shelf im waiting for the new MOBO
warco3
Member
+1|7165|Orlando, FL
The way I see it, that's 700,000 less morons, noobs, and whiners I have to put up with.
TriggerHappy998
just nothing
+387|7284|-
Whoop.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard