Fixes all the compatability problems, any errors, crashes and speedens the system up ( yeah, right... ). It's basically like Patch 1.2 for BF2...daffytag wrote:
So what does it do?Zimmer wrote:
No. Not a "fix". A "this makes it better, but it actually doesn't.".killer21 wrote:
What is the SP about? Meaning, what is the "fix"?
Could it be the time for me to buy Vista?
Interesting...Are we supposed to notice a slight performance increase? Because, it doesn't seem that there is any.
There isn't. But it is what they claimed. But after all the testers ripped them apart for claiming bullshit, they just say "It fixes shit".r'Eeee wrote:
Interesting...Are we supposed to notice a slight performance increase? Because, it doesn't seem that there is any.
So, basically, this is a patch, not a service pack?
Hmm, SP= Service Pack. But, I think, the two words are quite similar. I assume, that SP includes alot more fixes than a normal patch.killer21 wrote:
So, basically, this is a patch, not a service pack?
Last edited by r'Eeee (2008-03-18 15:11:00)
Service Pack = all hotfixes before the service pack (+ maybe a little bit more)
Normally in a SP, there are a number of hot fixes as well as other issues such as compatibility and stability. From what I am gathering from other posters, this SP is simple a patch. It doesn't really do much of anything.r'Eeee wrote:
Hmm, SP= Service Pack. But, I think, the two words are quite similar. I assume, that SP includes alot more fixes than a normal patch.
Doesn't show up in Winblows Update
fail
fail
Ha, we XP users are WAY ahead of you Vista fags, we're on SP2 already, since AGES back!
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Really? I always thought SP is Service Pack, but again, if I only know the difference.Sup wrote:
SP=Service Patch. At least it would seem so. I'm not going to install it.r'Eeee wrote:
Hmm, SP= Service Pack. But, I think, the two words are quite similar. I assume, that SP includes alot more fixes than a normal patch.killer21 wrote:
So, basically, this is a patch, not a service pack?
Last edited by r'Eeee (2008-03-18 15:47:53)
It's Service Pack...
edit: It says it right there on the SP1 page
edit: It says it right there on the SP1 page
Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-03-18 15:48:58)
They have been talking of SP3 for ages too now and it still isn't here. As I have to install XP often,it's a pain in the ass to install sp2 and then have to get another 100+ updates. (luckily we have a few images for some brands/models but not all of them).Freezer7Pro wrote:
Ha, we XP users are WAY ahead of you Vista fags, we're on SP2 already, since AGES back!
Yea, Sup is drunkHurricaИe wrote:
It's Service Pack...
edit: It says it right there on the SP1 page
No, lol i was just joking. Its service pack but some people were complaining and saying its more like a patch.r'Eeee wrote:
Really? I always thought SP is Service Pack, but again, if I only know the difference.Sup wrote:
SP=Service Patch. At least it would seem so. I'm not going to install it.r'Eeee wrote:
Hmm, SP= Service Pack. But, I think, the two words are quite similar. I assume, that SP includes alot more fixes than a normal patch.
but do you have DX10Freezer7Pro wrote:
Ha, we XP users are WAY ahead of you Vista fags, we're on SP2 already, since AGES back!
owut
Just installed, can't see a difference oh well
I'm having trouble installing this. I have 3 operating systems on my pc, and I have to select which one I want to use at start up. Could this be effecting the install ?