Well, he really did ban himself.
Funny how TMo got $t@ll0wn3d!! within 8 minutes of his OP
well i couldnt give you an accurate mathematical explanation like some did (cause i suck at math), so i just drew it up
Last edited by A12345 (2008-03-19 17:15:46)
We can't tell though. Change his user title.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well, he really did ban himself.
Pics or it didnt happen...Amidoingitright?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well, he really did ban himself.
Last edited by Roger Lesboules (2008-03-19 17:12:47)
I'm not going to change his user title, you guys are just going to have to take my word for it, as part of the administrative team. He really did ban himself.
Oh no what are we going to do without TMoFlaming_Maniac wrote:
I'm not going to change his user title, you guys are just going to have to take my word for it, as part of the administrative team. He really did ban himself.
Wow, that sucks to be him.. Isn't that a little harsh though?ThomasMorgan wrote:
However, in doing so, you've plagiarized. Enjoy your three day vacation with me.
... Still fucking hilarious either way..
There is no way to have a pic of your "Mod tool" saying he is bannzored?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I'm not going to change his user title, you guys are just going to have to take my word for it, as part of the administrative team. He really did ban himself.
Carpe Diem FM. Now is your chance to strike against your oppressors!Flaming_Maniac wrote:
I'm not going to change his user title, you guys are just going to have to take my word for it, as part of the administrative team. He really did ban himself.
That was a joke, wasn't it?LT.Victim wrote:
Wow, that sucks to be him.. Isn't that a little harsh though?ThomasMorgan wrote:
However, in doing so, you've plagiarized. Enjoy your three day vacation with me.
... Still fucking hilarious either way..
but he promised...sexecuti0ner wrote:
That was a joke, wasn't it?LT.Victim wrote:
Wow, that sucks to be him.. Isn't that a little harsh though?ThomasMorgan wrote:
However, in doing so, you've plagiarized. Enjoy your three day vacation with me.
... Still fucking hilarious either way..
Ran it's course, close.
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g44/F … ac/tmo.jpg
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
/partyFreezer7Pro wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g44/F … ac/tmo.jpg
Ahhh! Now your talking, thx!Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g44/F … ac/tmo.jpg
Pics is here, it did happen.
I like how the mod system still has that negative time bug
mod-abusing faggotThomasMorgan wrote:
Winner.Aries_37 wrote:
The 64 = 65 paradox arises from the fact that the edges of the four pieces, which lie along the diagonal of the formed rectangle, do not coincide exactly in direction. This diagonal is not a straight segment line but a small lozenge (diamond-shaped figure), whose acute angle is
arctan 2/3 - arctan 3/8 = arctan 1/46
which is less than 1 degree 15' . Only a very precise drawing can enable us to distinguish such a small angle. Using analytic geometry or trigonometry, we can easily prove that the area of the "hidden" lozenge is equal to that of a small square of the chessboard.
Goodbye
EDIT:we did this back in high school it's so basic o.O
pictures ahere http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DissectionFallacy.html
See you guys in three.
However, in doing so, you've plagiarized. Enjoy your three day vacation with me.
(ha ha, he can't do shit about it cause he's banned)
Time on our forums goes back to 1967 if you delete the most recent post.cowami wrote:
I like how the mod system still has that negative time bug
so /thread?
Unless Hurricane feels like abusing more banned admins.jsnipy wrote:
so /thread?
NOOOOO TMO! You're the only mod I actually like! ; _ ;
Lurk moar! Or at least read the thread. He's already been banzored.Ryan wrote:
42.
temp ban urself pl0x
kthxbai
Tee hee, he deleted his post.
Last edited by Havok (2008-03-19 20:18:40)
That's why I deleted my post.
I bet TMo didn't think anyone would answer it so fast :p
I bet TMo didn't think anyone would answer it so fast :p