(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7256|Grapevine, TX

bbc news wrote:

AB Volvo's Iraq kickbacks penalty
https://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40946000/jpg/_40946310_volvotruck203.jpg

The penalty relates to two subsidiaries of Volvo Trucks
The Swedish lorry maker AB Volvo has agreed to pay millions of dollars in fines in connection with an inquiry into Iraq's UN oil-for-food programme.

It will pay a $7m (£3.5m) fine to the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and $4m in civil fines to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The firm will also pay $8.6m - the amount two of its subsidiaries had made in profits from the programme.

In return, the units will not face prosecution for at least three years.

The DOJ will drop the prosecution completely if the two units - Renault Trucks and Volvo Construction Equipment - abide by the terms of an agreement.

The details of the deals were not disclosed.

Kickbacks demanded

The oil-for-food programme was established by the UN to limit the humanitarian impact of the international sanctions on Iraq.

But the Iraqi government began demanding kickbacks from companies seeking to sell products under the scheme - usually amounting to 10% of the total contract.

"Today's acknowledgement by AB Volvo of its subsidiaries' wrongdoing in making illegal payments to the former Iraqi government in exchange for contracts is one more step in holding accountable those companies who conspired to deceive the United Nations," said Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher.

Volvo's chief executive Leif Johansson described the incident as regrettable.

"But we do note with some satisfaction that the authorities spoke favourably of the co-operation by Volvo as well as Volvo's own investigation and measures," he said.

AB Volvo is not the company that makes Volvo cars. It sold the carmaking division to Ford in 1999.
I heard another story earlier in the week about some guy from here, in Texas, going to jail, too. I only assume this isn't "new" news so no one cares about this unbilevable story. How these private companies, public companies and even UN sanctioned members, broke the law. And years later its only good enough for page 25...

I'd like to hear your opinion about this "old" news. When in my opinion, it really makes me wonder why its been so easy to avoid the root problems with the era of Dictatorship under Saddam Hussein. Look pretty clear that there were a lot of people making record amounts of profits, illegally, and they didn't want to get caught.






And this is something all together interesting: look at the last statement in this article:
AB Volvo is not the company that makes Volvo cars. It sold the carmaking division to Ford in 1999.
Yeah Ford bought them, but AB Volvo still makes these vehicles. Am I wrong? Are they intentionally trying to steer clear of the story here? Whats the deal with that?
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7256|Grapevine, TX
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7149|Eastern PA
Whores for the almighty dolla'.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina
One way or another, Iraq will always be someone's bitch.  With this program, they were Europe's bitch (and the bitch of some American companies too).  Now, they are our bitch (again).  When we leave, they will be Iran's bitch.
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6800|Kyiv, Ukraine

Turquoise wrote:

...When we leave, they will be Iran's bitch.
Yes, because there is absolutely nobody else interfering in Iraq right now, its all Iran's influence...we even traced the serial numbers on the IED's back to Ammindibeodubjoebodad's uncle's dog's cousin's garage. 

The second you hear something like "the IED's can be traced by their serial numbers", your bullshit detector should go off like a banging cowbell.

Yes, Iran is a player, but not even the most influential.  There happens to also be 4 others that are fucking up the situation far worse.  But so long as the war drums beat for Iran, I guess that's all that counts.

Maybe Chomsky can explain the propoganda aspect better.

Chomsky wrote:

Unsurprisingly, George W. Bush's announcement of a "surge" in Iraq came despite the firm opposition to any such move of Americans and the even stronger opposition of the (thoroughly irrelevant) Iraqis. It was accompanied by ominous official leaks and statements -- from Washington and Baghdad -- about how Iranian intervention in Iraq was aimed at disrupting our mission to gain victory, an aim which is (by definition) noble. What then followed was a solemn debate about whether serial numbers on advanced roadside bombs (IEDs) were really traceable to Iran; and, if so, to that country's Revolutionary Guards or to some even higher authority.

This "debate" is a typical illustration of a primary principle of sophisticated propaganda. In crude and brutal societies, the Party Line is publicly proclaimed and must be obeyed -- or else. What you actually believe is your own business and of far less concern. In societies where the state has lost the capacity to control by force, the Party Line is simply presupposed; then, vigorous debate is encouraged within the limits imposed by unstated doctrinal orthodoxy. The cruder of the two systems leads, naturally enough, to disbelief; the sophisticated variant gives an impression of openness and freedom, and so far more effectively serves to instill the Party Line. It becomes beyond question, beyond thought itself, like the air we breathe.

The debate over Iranian interference in Iraq proceeds without ridicule on the assumption that the United States owns the world. We did not, for example, engage in a similar debate in the 1980s about whether the U.S. was interfering in Soviet-occupied Afghanistan, and I doubt that Pravda, probably recognizing the absurdity of the situation, sank to outrage about that fact (which American officials and our media, in any case, made no effort to conceal). Perhaps the official Nazi press also featured solemn debates about whether the Allies were interfering in sovereign Vichy France, though if so, sane people would then have collapsed in ridicule.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina
Ok...  yeah, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Syria are all influencing Iraq as well, but who's number 4?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard