sergeriver wrote:
If you kill a child abuser you are helping society, not based on your own morals, but on the modern societies morals.
Poll
If you had to kill one out of this list, which one would you kill?
| A child abuser | 36% | 36% - 65 | ||||
| A rapist | 12% | 12% - 23 | ||||
| A corrupted politician | 17% | 17% - 31 | ||||
| A terrorist | 14% | 14% - 26 | ||||
| A drug dealer | 2% | 2% - 4 | ||||
| A serial killer | 15% | 15% - 28 | ||||
| Total: 177 | ||||||
The politician. They have the most power but is the government. He can control heaps of things (granted they have power/influence).
noice 
politician
Paedophile - They prey on the defenceless and ruin lives.
Fuck Israel
If I had to kill them personally and was allowed to torture them myself, I would choose a child molester. I have kids, so I guess I am bias.
The serial killer had probably caused the most pain by taking multiple lives so they would deserve to die most.
The serial killer had probably caused the most pain by taking multiple lives so they would deserve to die most.
Dilbert_X wrote:
Paedophile - They prey on the defenceless and ruin lives.
The GDI soldier as he is all those things in one convenient, easy to kill package.
I say the politician. If you think about it, it is the only choice because his crimes were likely all of the crimes in the poll.
good poll... tough choice.
i would say a terrorist, only because they have the potential to kill the most people. as horrible as the others are in the list, you would save the most lives by eliminating the terrorist.
i would say a terrorist, only because they have the potential to kill the most people. as horrible as the others are in the list, you would save the most lives by eliminating the terrorist.
BN wrote:
none. i dont believe in killing.
Child abuser. Children should never be harmed, simple as that.
A terrorist: They hide behind kids, they kill innocents. They have the most disgusting intentions, namely to terrorize. IMO, the terrorist could be all of the options above.
-konfusion
-konfusion
Funny that there is only one vote for drug dealer... Too many customers here?
Does that mean that as long as I go around killing morally wrong people I am helping society?sergeriver wrote:
If you kill a child abuser you are helping society, not based on your own morals, but on the modern societies morals.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
But you as a murderer would be deserving to be a part of society because it is your job to self-police society based on your own morals?sergeriver wrote:
Those are the scum of society, they don't deserve to be a part of it at all.
The definition of child abuse is so broad, even in America. Some people feel spanking a child is child abuse. Should a mother or father who does that deserve to die? Do we need to define what constitutes heinous enough child abuse?
modern society used to think it was ok to sacrifice goats for the gods too.
Normally I'd say a terrorist, but there'll always be another to take his place.
I say child abuser.
I say child abuser.
i say a drug dealer - i've seen more lives ruined from drugs than i've seen stories about pedophiles on the news
I can't decide and can't vote. In a way they all affect innocent people, though the drug dealer, politician, and the terrorist would affect a broader range of people including children. tough call very tough call.
Last edited by loubot (2008-03-26 13:26:48)
Very hard to pick but im assuming the corrupt politician is making high up decisions about our lives in which case it would have to be him, he has the largest effect over people.
Try based on any animals natural instinct. Even the scroungiest junk yard dog understands the importance of protecting it's puppies. The anger we feel when people threaten our children is above all others for a reason. Disposing of the threat permanently and definitely is Darwinism at it's best. Sometimes it's only parents that get this.sergeriver wrote:
If you kill a child abuser you are helping society, not based on your own morals, but on the modern societies morals.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
But you as a murderer would be deserving to be a part of society because it is your job to self-police society based on your own morals?sergeriver wrote:
Those are the scum of society, they don't deserve to be a part of it at all.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
And male lions know that if you run off the current alpha male you've got to kill ALL THE CUBS. Else the females won't breed with you.
Damn, if that's what it takes to get some ass I'd spend my days under a tree licking myself.topal63 wrote:
And male lions know that if you run off the current alpha male you've got to kill ALL THE CUBS. Else the females won't breed with you.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Honestly if I could lick myself... well, do I need to actually expound?Kmarion wrote:
Damn, if that's what it takes to get some ass I'd spend my days under a tree licking myself.topal63 wrote:
And male lions know that if you run off the current alpha male you've got to kill ALL THE CUBS. Else the females won't breed with you.
No they don't. Terrorists kill virtually no people (some, every now and again when they get lucky). Crap engineers have the potential to kill way more people than your typical terrorist.Turquoise wrote:
Terrorist... Generally speaking, terrorists have the potential to kill the most people.
Yup. Politicians. They impact loads of stuff and have the potential to kill shitloads of people and make loads of people live in poverty and misery too. Look at someone like Mugabe. There are loads of horrendously corrupt politicians that have a far more negative impact on many more peoples lives (particularly in Africa) than any of the other options on that list.Vilham wrote:
Very hard to pick but im assuming the corrupt politician is making high up decisions about our lives in which case it would have to be him, he has the largest effect over people.
Where's the option for in-laws?