Guess I'm a Taliban member then
Are anybody defending them ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
why is anyone defending them?Varegg wrote:
Have you honestly found that many posts defending Taliban ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I dont understand why Im reading so many posts defending them. Is this the twilight zone?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
they are attacking the OP
I'm not sure what to say.CommieChipmunk wrote:
Blatant dehumanization by some propaganda noob.Ollie wrote:
This was stupid. Obviously written by some right-wing American moron.
That may have worked in WWII when the Japanese were made to look like sub-human, soulless animals.
However, I'd like to believe that society, as a whole, as become more intelligent since those days, and realizes that we are being killed by, and killing people not so different from ourselves..
Shall we make them0v3m3nt wrote:
That's right, they're not human, they're animals.
Just like the Native American Indians, or the Africans, or the Nazis, or the Russians, or the Iraqis, or anybody else whos been demonised for a purpose over the years.
Can we now have the lists:
10 signs YOU might be black.
10 signs YOU might be a Jew.
10 signs YOU might be gay.
And my personal favourite:
10 signs YOU might be a useful idiot.
10 signs YOU might be gay?
Doesn't mean they support Taliban does it ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
they are attacking the OP
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
why be offended at the OP? why start crying about propaganda? its humor. apparently some here think that the taliban have a legitimate cause.Varegg wrote:
Doesn't mean they support Taliban does it ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
they are attacking the OP
Canadianloser wrote:
ig wrote:
wat
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
And who might that be ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
why be offended at the OP? why start crying about propaganda? its humor. apparently some here think that the taliban have a legitimate cause.Varegg wrote:
Doesn't mean they support Taliban does it ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
they are attacking the OP
I have yet to see a post that supports or legitimate Taliban in any way ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Get a sense of humour peoples, it makes the world a much better place............
no u. gb2d&st please, and now.m0v3m3nt wrote:
That's right, they're not human, they're animals.
Just like the Native American Indians, or the Africans, or the Nazis, or the Russians, or the Iraqis, or anybody else whos been demonised for a purpose over the years.
Can we now have the lists:
10 signs YOU might be black.
10 signs YOU might be a Jew.
10 signs YOU might be gay.
And my personal favourite:
10 signs YOU might be a useful idiot.
QFE. I hate people who are serious all the time, unless seriousness must be used... this being a place (the internet) where seriousnessness is not really needed. (unless in D&st, then you are srs catz)VspyVspy wrote:
Get a sense of humour peoples, it makes the world a much better place............
noice 
whats your problem? have you not read the first page? have you not read my replies?Varegg wrote:
And who might that be ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
why be offended at the OP? why start crying about propaganda? its humor. apparently some here think that the taliban have a legitimate cause.Varegg wrote:
Doesn't mean they support Taliban does it ?
I have yet to see a post that supports or legitimate Taliban in any way ...
No rather what's your problem ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
whats your problem? have you not read the first page? have you not read my replies?Varegg wrote:
And who might that be ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
why be offended at the OP? why start crying about propaganda? its humor. apparently some here think that the taliban have a legitimate cause.
I have yet to see a post that supports or legitimate Taliban in any way ...
I have read every post in this thread and i find nothing to conclude that any of them are supportive towards Taliban, i have asked you to show me who legitimate Taliban but you have yet to answer ... you brought it up so why don't you state your case and show me the Taliban supporters in this thread ... or while you are at it find me one on the entire forum ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
How about when you start targeting civilians? That's a good place to draw the line.CommieChipmunk wrote:
Where's the line between terrorist, insurgent and patriot?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
This thread is teh funniez, what with the page+ of 'wat'
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
lol, best thing is ig didn't even say that to begin withSpark wrote:
This thread is teh funniez, what with the page+ of 'wat'
lmfao, he didn't even post at all
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-03-27 03:48:53)
I believe that we can safely say that ig's quote 'wat', has become so powerful that it has disconnected and has now a life of its own.
ig wrote:
wat
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
the simple fact that that the OP is being attacked so vigorously leaves me the impression that some on this forum would rather not see negative humor aimed at the taliban. It wouldnt take a fricking rocket scientist to see why I would think that. You ask me to show you and I say look at the first page. If you still dont know why i make that conclusion, you are either arguing for argument's sakes, or are just plain dense.Varegg wrote:
No rather what's your problem ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
whats your problem? have you not read the first page? have you not read my replies?Varegg wrote:
And who might that be ?
I have yet to see a post that supports or legitimate Taliban in any way ...
I have read every post in this thread and i find nothing to conclude that any of them are supportive towards Taliban, i have asked you to show me who legitimate Taliban but you have yet to answer ... you brought it up so why don't you state your case and show me the Taliban supporters in this thread ... or while you are at it find me one on the entire forum ...
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-03-27 06:15:15)
Lez do it.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
the simple fact that that the OP is being attacked so vigorously leaves me the impression that some on this forum would rather not see negative humor aimed at the taliban. It wouldnt take a fricking rocket scientist to see why I would think that. You ask me to show you and I say look at the first page. If you still dont know why i make that conclusion, you are either arguing for argument's sakes, or are just plain dense.Varegg wrote:
No rather what's your problem ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
whats your problem? have you not read the first page? have you not read my replies?
I have read every post in this thread and i find nothing to conclude that any of them are supportive towards Taliban, i have asked you to show me who legitimate Taliban but you have yet to answer ... you brought it up so why don't you state your case and show me the Taliban supporters in this thread ... or while you are at it find me one on the entire forum ...
I still are unable to see the connection where someone is supporting Taliban because they commented on the OP or any other post in this thread so maybe i am denseGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
the simple fact that that the OP is being attacked so vigorously leaves me the impression that some on this forum would rather not see negative humor aimed at the taliban. It wouldnt take a fricking rocket scientist to see why I would think that. You ask me to show you and I say look at the first page. If you still dont know why i make that conclusion, you are either arguing for argument's sakes, or are just plain dense.Varegg wrote:
No rather what's your problem ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
whats your problem? have you not read the first page? have you not read my replies?
I have read every post in this thread and i find nothing to conclude that any of them are supportive towards Taliban, i have asked you to show me who legitimate Taliban but you have yet to answer ... you brought it up so why don't you state your case and show me the Taliban supporters in this thread ... or while you are at it find me one on the entire forum ...
Finding a Taliban joke not funny doesn't mean you support them does it ? Does it exclude them from sharing that they don't think it's funny ?
But I'm not a rocket scientist and i didn't know they had exclusive rights on common sense ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
It's a logical conclusion, that's all. Posts like "That's right, they're not human, they're animals." and "Where's the line between terrorist, insurgent and patriot?" support this.Varegg wrote:
I still are unable to see the connection where someone is supporting Taliban because they commented on the OP or any other post in this thread so maybe i am dense
Finding a Taliban joke not funny doesn't mean you support them does it ? Does it exclude them from sharing that they don't think it's funny ?
But I'm not a rocket scientist and i didn't know they had exclusive rights on common sense ...
I think he is arguing for the sake of arguing. Hes not dumb.SenorToenails wrote:
It's a logical conclusion, that's all. Posts like "That's right, they're not human, they're animals." and "Where's the line between terrorist, insurgent and patriot?" support this.Varegg wrote:
I still are unable to see the connection where someone is supporting Taliban because they commented on the OP or any other post in this thread so maybe i am dense
Finding a Taliban joke not funny doesn't mean you support them does it ? Does it exclude them from sharing that they don't think it's funny ?
But I'm not a rocket scientist and i didn't know they had exclusive rights on common sense ...
Varegg wrote:
No rather what's your problem ?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
whats your problem? have you not read the first page? have you not read my replies?Varegg wrote:
And who might that be ?
I have yet to see a post that supports or legitimate Taliban in any way ...
I have read every post in this thread and i find nothing to conclude that any of them are supportive towards Taliban, i have asked you to show me who legitimate Taliban but you have yet to answer ... you brought it up so why don't you state your case and show me the Taliban supporters in this thread ... or while you are at it find me one on the entire forum ...
------jord wrote:
I'm not sure what to say.CommieChipmunk wrote:
Blatant dehumanization by some propaganda noob.Ollie wrote:
This was stupid. Obviously written by some right-wing American moron.
That may have worked in WWII when the Japanese were made to look like sub-human, soulless animals.
However, I'd like to believe that society, as a whole, as become more intelligent since those days, and realizes that we are being killed by, and killing people not so different from ourselves..
You/re pulling a BubaJord. Arguing just for the sake of it.
Not for arguments sake allthough i agree it can look like it - my point is we are to quick to label people based on an opinion we don't agree with and that's unnecesary imho ...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I think he is arguing for the sake of arguing. Hes not dumb.SenorToenails wrote:
It's a logical conclusion, that's all. Posts like "That's right, they're not human, they're animals." and "Where's the line between terrorist, insurgent and patriot?" support this.Varegg wrote:
I still are unable to see the connection where someone is supporting Taliban because they commented on the OP or any other post in this thread so maybe i am dense
Finding a Taliban joke not funny doesn't mean you support them does it ? Does it exclude them from sharing that they don't think it's funny ?
But I'm not a rocket scientist and i didn't know they had exclusive rights on common sense ...
I have done the very same myself on ocasion
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
CommieChipmunk wrote:
Where's the line between terrorist, insurgent and patriot?
CommieChipmunk wrote:
Blatant dehumanization by some propaganda noob.Ollie wrote:
This was stupid. Obviously written by some right-wing American moron.
That may have worked in WWII when the Japanese were made to look like sub-human, soulless animals.
However, I'd like to believe that society, as a whole, as become more intelligent since those days, and realizes that we are being killed by, and killing people not so different from ourselves..
Ollie wrote:
This was stupid. Obviously written by some right-wing American moron.
m0v3m3nt wrote:
That's right, they're not human, they're animals.
Just like the Native American Indians, or the Africans, or the Nazis, or the Russians, or the Iraqis, or anybody else whos been demonised for a purpose over the years.
Can we now have the lists:
10 signs YOU might be black.
10 signs YOU might be a Jew.
10 signs YOU might be gay.
And my personal favourite:
10 signs YOU might be a useful idiot.
good pointVaregg wrote:
my point is we are to quick to label people based on an opinion we don't agree with and that's unnecesary imho ...