There is one in my room. My lease says its ok to smoke in my room. Won't it set it off? Or does it go off only with a large concentration of smoke?
It's too cold to go outside.
It's too cold to go outside.
Last edited by Morpheus1229 (2008-03-28 21:53:35)
It's some cheap one that's hardwired to the apartment's electrical setup. Wikipedia says only fancier ones can detect carbon monoxide smoke. So I'm guessing I'm ok.Locoloki wrote:
if it goes off take the batteries out. Just remember to put them back in after
unless your fishbowling it shouldnt set it off
is it a fancy one that automatically calls help, or just one that operates with batteries?
smoke near a window with it cracked
there really is only one way to find out
Last edited by AWSMFOX (2008-03-28 22:50:00)
Last edited by Stun_Gun (2008-03-28 22:56:48)
AWSMFOX wrote:
magic
Last edited by some_random_panda (2008-03-29 02:44:45)
thats how I learned it in physics class. Probs that method hasn't been used in centuries ...some_random_panda wrote:
Some smoke detectors use a small radioactive sample (americium-241) and a detector. Normally the alpha particles ionise the air between the detector and the source (think of the principle of a geiger counter, but this time the argon/whatever you use gas is air), but when smoke is present the ions attach themselves to the smoke particles, meaning that the ions can no longer move about as freely. The voltage drops in the detector and this sets off the alarm.
http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/ … -46422.jpg
Yeah, thats how I learnt it too. I thought all smoke detectors contained a radioactive substance?max wrote:
thats how I learned it in physics class. Probs that method hasn't been used in centuries ...some_random_panda wrote:
Some smoke detectors use a small radioactive sample (americium-241) and a detector. Normally the alpha particles ionise the air between the detector and the source (think of the principle of a geiger counter, but this time the argon/whatever you use gas is air), but when smoke is present the ions attach themselves to the smoke particles, meaning that the ions can no longer move about as freely. The voltage drops in the detector and this sets off the alarm.
http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/ … -46422.jpg
AWSMFOX wrote:
AWSMFOX wrote:
magic
I herd magiks too.Mek-Izzle wrote:
AWSMFOX wrote:
AWSMFOX wrote:
magic
apparently not anymore_raab wrote:
Yeah, thats how I learnt it too. I thought all smoke detectors contained a radioactive substance?max wrote:
thats how I learned it in physics class. Probs that method hasn't been used in centuries ...some_random_panda wrote:
Some smoke detectors use a small radioactive sample (americium-241) and a detector. Normally the alpha particles ionise the air between the detector and the source (think of the principle of a geiger counter, but this time the argon/whatever you use gas is air), but when smoke is present the ions attach themselves to the smoke particles, meaning that the ions can no longer move about as freely. The voltage drops in the detector and this sets off the alarm.
http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/ … -46422.jpg
And I thought that I could make a geiger counter out of my smoke detector.max wrote:
apparently not anymore_raab wrote:
Yeah, thats how I learnt it too. I thought all smoke detectors contained a radioactive substance?max wrote:
thats how I learned it in physics class. Probs that method hasn't been used in centuries ...
Our physics teacher keeps reminding us that if we took the alpha particle out of the smoke detector we could easily kill someone if they unfortunately ingested it.some_random_panda wrote:
And I thought that I could make a geiger counter out of my smoke detector.max wrote:
apparently not anymore_raab wrote:
Yeah, thats how I learnt it too. I thought all smoke detectors contained a radioactive substance?
Ours hasmax wrote:
apparently not anymore_raab wrote:
Yeah, thats how I learnt it too. I thought all smoke detectors contained a radioactive substance?max wrote:
thats how I learned it in physics class. Probs that method hasn't been used in centuries ...
Three mentions of "carbon monoxide" in one sentence... Gotta be a new record.Wikipedia wrote:
A smoke detector cannot detect carbon monoxide to prevent carbon monoxide poisoning unless it has an integrated carbon monoxide detector.
But knowing you it's from the 80's or somethingFreezer7Pro wrote:
Ours hasmax wrote:
apparently not anymore_raab wrote:
Yeah, thats how I learnt it too. I thought all smoke detectors contained a radioactive substance?
Only dangerous when inside you though, as they get absorbed by a few centimetres of air particles, and can't penetrate much.kylef wrote:
Smoke detectors work through alpha particles. When this "line" of particles is disrupted an alarm sounds. These particles are extremely dangerous; I can't remember the name but someone was murdered by the fact that someone injected alpha particles into a glass of water - which he then drank. It sped up the the cancer process and he died very suddenly.
Hey, I guess Physics is useful for learning after all..