CPU Temperature

2008-03-29 17:57:09

#1

Overdose: Member; +13|6387|Fort Worth, TX

Everest and Speedfan are giving me two different temperature readings. Everest reads them higher than i like. Speedfan looks like it has more realistic readings. Which one do you think is right?

https://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3875/tempsys7.jpg

*this is while my cpu is stressed

2008-03-29 17:58:51

#2

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6469|Winland

Check your idle speeds in Windows and compare to those shown in the BIOS setup.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-03-29 17:59:13

#3

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6735|cuntshitlake

I cannot say ultimate truth, but for me speedfan shows right, everest corrupts.

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-03-29 18:02:26

#4

{M5}Sniper3: Typical white person.; +389|7032|San Antonio, Texas

Get a third program.

2008-03-29 18:06:02

#5

NooBesT: Pizzahitler; +873|6741

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Get a third program.

And what to do when it shows different that the two others?

2008-03-29 18:07:23

#6

{M5}Sniper3: Typical white person.; +389|7032|San Antonio, Texas

NooBesT wrote:
{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Get a third program.
And what to do when it shows different that the two others?

Run around screaming because 3 different programmers couldn't get a temp reading right.

2008-03-29 18:09:54

#7

NooBesT: Pizzahitler; +873|6741

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
NooBesT wrote:
{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Get a third program.
And what to do when it shows different that the two others?
Run around screaming because 3 different programmers couldn't get a temp reading right.

I think it's apocalypse coming, run for your lives. (not that it will help)

2008-03-29 18:10:15

#8

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6469|Winland

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Check your idle speeds in Windows and compare to those shown in the BIOS setup.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-03-29 18:11:59

#9

{M5}Sniper3: Typical white person.; +389|7032|San Antonio, Texas

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Check your idle speeds in Windows and compare to those shown in the BIOS setup.

And what if the BIOS's reading is off?

2008-03-29 18:12:57

#10

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6469|Winland

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Check your idle speeds in Windows and compare to those shown in the BIOS setup.
And what if the BIOS's reading is off?

It's propably the most correct one.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-03-29 18:16:02

#11

NooBesT: Pizzahitler; +873|6741

Freezer7Pro wrote:
{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:

And what if the BIOS's reading is off?
It's propably the most correct one.

How can we be certain?!

2008-03-29 18:16:54

#12

belZe: Member; +23|7106

Reason may be that the real temperature can't be read out. It's always the distance from the temperature which is the safe maximum operating core temperature for the CPU. That temperature is defined by the manufacturer. The actual temperature is "guessed" from that distance.
So maybe they just calculate somehow different?!

2008-03-29 18:21:15

#13

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6469|Winland

belZe wrote:
Reason may be that the real temperature can't be read out. It's always the distance from the temperature which is the safe maximum operating core temperature for the CPU. That temperature is defined by the manufacturer. The actual temperature is "guessed" from that distance.
So maybe they just calculate somehow different?!

MAYBE THEY DO?!

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-03-29 18:37:41

#14

belZe: Member; +23|7106

Freezer7Pro wrote:
belZe wrote:
Reason may be that the real temperature can't be read out. It's always the distance from the temperature which is the safe maximum operating core temperature for the CPU. That temperature is defined by the manufacturer. The actual temperature is "guessed" from that distance.
So maybe they just calculate somehow different?!
MAYBE THEY DO?!

Any problems?

2008-03-29 19:35:02

#15

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6469|Winland

belZe wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
belZe wrote:
Reason may be that the real temperature can't be read out. It's always the distance from the temperature which is the safe maximum operating core temperature for the CPU. That temperature is defined by the manufacturer. The actual temperature is "guessed" from that distance.
So maybe they just calculate somehow different?!
MAYBE THEY DO?!
Any problems?

You used ?!

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-03-29 20:02:56

#16

Overdose: Member; +13|6387|Fort Worth, TX

oddy the "third program" gives the same temps as Everest

2008-03-29 20:30:08

#17

[TUF]Whiskey_Oktober: mmmm...Toasty!; +91|6994|Oregon

assuming your on a intel cpu, get intel TAT. by far the best.

BF2S Forums CPU Temperature

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

belZe wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

belZe wrote:

belZe wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

belZe wrote:

Board footer