BF2S Forums One of the most long awaited stories.

Turquoise wrote:

oug wrote:

Looking at the op article, it's amazing... but I still can't get it into my head that this man was President of the United States of America for eight years...

We've had worse, and we'll probably have someone worse again.  Certain things about America are great, but our choices for president usually aren't.

They really aren't our choices.  The populous only gets to choose from the lesser of who cares, in most cases.  Following this formula there will most probably be worse choices on the horizon.

madmurre wrote:

George was´nt that bad always had a smile to put up when things went bad, he was funny.

Funny like cancer.

CloakedStarship wrote:

madmurre wrote:

George was´nt that bad always had a smile to put up when things went bad, he was funny.

You know, our soldiers knew what they were signing up for when they enlisted.  But at 4000 dead, I'm really not laughing anymore.

With all respect that´s completely irrelavant as you said soldiers know what they sign for, then i´m not from over there i have a easier time smiling when i see Bush ( he sure is/look like a sort of funny guy imo )

madmurre wrote:

CloakedStarship wrote:

madmurre wrote:

George was´nt that bad always had a smile to put up when things went bad, he was funny.

You know, our soldiers knew what they were signing up for when they enlisted.  But at 4000 dead, I'm really not laughing anymore.

With all respect that´s completely irrelavant as you said soldiers know what they sign for, then i´m not from over there i have a easier time smiling when i see Bush ( he sure is/look like a sort of funny guy imo )

Bush smiling makes me completely forget all the lives wasted in the wasteland that is Iraq.  We don't need to be there, they don't need to be dieing there.  But yes, thank god Bush can still smile, despite all the shit hes landed us in.

ATG wrote:

They know about Stop Loss?

Apparently not.  I was referring to the possibility of death during service.  But alas, this is relevant, as they may have to face the same death, again.  And then we're back at the whole, why are we in Iraq in the first place deal.

Last edited by CloakedStarship (2008-03-29 20:49:24)

CloakedStarship wrote:

madmurre wrote:

CloakedStarship wrote:

You know, our soldiers knew what they were signing up for when they enlisted.  But at 4000 dead, I'm really not laughing anymore.

With all respect that´s completely irrelavant as you said soldiers know what they sign for, then i´m not from over there i have a easier time smiling when i see Bush ( he sure is/look like a sort of funny guy imo )

Bush smiling makes me completely forget all the lives wasted in the wasteland that is Iraq.  We don't need to be there, they don't need to be dieing there.  But yes, thank god Bush can still smile, despite all the shit hes landed us in.

In all fairness, I don't think he landed us in anything. It how he landed in what was handed to him that matters.

" Contractors " are running mad in Iraq, getting paid four times or more what the soldiers are making. I doubt a lot of the soldiers who signed up knew that they would bumping elbows with American hired mercenaries.


I could literally spend hours defining the many levels of the failure of Bush.

The GWOT was an excuse to explode spending, power and military might. That will forever be his legacy.

Reciprocity wrote:

7 1/2 years ago I remember asking someone, "what's the worst that could happen?"



Jesus H. Christ.

He has surpassed all measure.

The behavior of George Bush, his idiotic statements, the tax cuts WHILE exploding NON militaryspending, the open borders...actually...make you wonder about some of the 9-11 conspiracies. His administration was hell bent on war.

Quote Pyramid wrote:

ATG wrote:

In all fairness, I don't think he landed us in anything. It how he landed in what was handed to him that matters.

" Contractors " are running mad in Iraq, getting paid four times or more what the soldiers are making. I doubt a lot of the soldiers who signed up knew that they would bumping elbows with American hired mercenaries.


I could literally spend hours defining the many levels of the failure of Bush.

The GWOT was an excuse to explode spending, power and military might. That will forever be his legacy.

Its a shame that nobody could have foreseen the quagmire we are in.  Honestly, I think there has been a massive failure in the system if we're employing mercenaries. 

And really, of the three countries we were worried about having WMD's, I would have to say that Iran and North Korea were probably bigger threats.  But thank god he chose the middle east so we could get fucked in the ass by suicide bombers left and right.  But then again... oh god I just can't logically deduce what the right thing to do was, things, now and then, are and were so fucked up.

Oh, tax cuts + massive increase in spending = oops, o hay debt wassup.  True.

Cheney knew what was up.  He even described invading Iraq and toppling Saddam as a quagmire back in 1994 during an interview with the American Enterprise Institute when he was asked why the first Bush didn't remove Saddam from power.  He described quite clearly that a conflict would arise between the 3 major ethnic groups.

The youtube clip of this has been posted before, but I'll look it up again for shits and giggles.

Either way, Cheney expected this to be a mess.  I think that was the intention.  The more of a mess it becomes, the easier it is to justify that contractors remain in Iraq with the soldiers so that tons of money can be made for companies like Halliburton.

Also, the more turmoil there is in the Middle East, the more oil goes up in price.

Last edited by Turquoise (2008-03-29 22:48:07)

CameronPoe wrote:

ATG wrote:

It'll be over soon.

Not a moment too soon. That man has done a lot of immoral, uncalled for, stupid and deceitful things and I, and most of the rest of the non-American world (including most of the American world too I gather), can't wait to see the back of him.

... Lawl

None of the candidates for this election will be any better

FEOS wrote:

Never.

That's pretty optimistic, considering how simple it would be to do assuming you could get hold of a nuke.
Even a dirty bomb would be straighforward.
Either could be sailed in in a reasonably sized yacht or trawler.
Simplest would be stick it in a shipping container.

madmurre wrote:

The fact they had the attack-plans ready for Iraq before elections speaks for em self.

No. It doesn't. We have "attack plans" (they are called operations plans or OPLANS) for just about every problem country/area worldwide. There was one for Iraq before Iraq invaded Kuwait. There are multiple others. Their existence speaks for nothing other than contingency preparation.

We might have one for the defense of Canada, but I don't know for sure.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

GorillaTicTacs wrote:

I come all the way here to get away from this guy, and he invites himself over for dinner.  Jack ass.

lol

nice revive