LOL... good points...Lotta_Drool wrote:
They have lowered the limit so much now that you are screwed if you use cough syrup and drive.
People are better off smoking weed. No DUI B.S. and a slap on the wrist if caught with it.
Oh wait, I'm against Pot.
Last edited by cpt.fass1 (2008-03-31 15:57:34)
Only expert drivers should drink and drive.Mek-Izzle wrote:
Sure, drink and drive if you want. I'll admit, I've done it once in a while ...
Just don't get caught
Or crash
Or kill anyone..
The level you are impaired differs from person to person, now consider the differing 'laws' in each country on what is an acceptable BAC and he might have been a child abuser in one country but not in another. Laws are a human made system and are therefore susceptible to mistakes, persecuting someone on the basis that the laws they infringed are infallible is as ignorant as religion.IRONCHEF wrote:
No, read it. Still drove drunk (drunk driving = impaired...still able to kill people through gross negligence). Try losing someone to a drunk driver who "made a mistake" and see how it feels..see if you take any and every opportunity to "vent some anger."jord wrote:
Did you just read the title and get all excited and scroll down to the message field shaking with excitement that you can finally vent some anger?IRONCHEF wrote:
If I had it my way, I'd require DUI charges be escalated to "ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER." Die in fire you worthless, selfish, incompetent piece of shit!
Yes, I do feel that way about drunk drivers. Drunk drivers = child abusers.
He woke up the day after. I'll repeat that. The day after drinking. He was stopped for whatever reason and was 8 1000's over the limit...
You could, but they would arrest and hold you, get a warrant to take a blood sample and then you would be charged with both the DUI and some kind of resisting arrest (or something I don't know what it would be called).CTD-CaptainBuck wrote:
1 solution. DONT TAKE THE BREATHALYZER.
Why don't you take it a step further and say that everybody who drives should be charged with vehicular manslaughter? You don't need to be drunk to kill someone with a car.IRONCHEF wrote:
If I had it my way, I'd require DUI charges be escalated to "ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER." Die in fire you worthless, selfish, incompetent piece of shit!
Yes, I do feel that way about drunk drivers. Drunk drivers = child abusers.
Oh, and good generization, there, internet tough guy.DrunkFace wrote:
The level you are impaired differs from person to person, now consider the differing 'laws' in each country on what is an acceptable BAC... Laws are a human made system and are therefore susceptible to mistakes...
Driving while intoxicated is plainly irresponsible and dangerous to everyone else on the road. One cannot contest that fact.Morpheus1229 wrote:
Why don't you take it a step further and say that everybody who drives should be charged with vehicular manslaughter? You don't need to be drunk to kill someone with a car.
I thought you give up the right to not take a Breathalyzer when you get your license. This is me trying to remember from the Driver's Ed class I didn't pay attention in, so don't get mad at me for being wrong.CTD-CaptainBuck wrote:
1 solution. DONT TAKE THE BREATHALYZER. if u dont take the breathalyzer you can fight it and the fines will be much lower and you may not lose your license for as long... i copped my DUI a long time ago and ive been severly fucked as far as anything goes... restricted license and outrageouslly high fines.. (none of u uppity fuckers give me any shit) ive paid my dues, the shit is ridiculous in the end of it all im going to be $3-4000 in the hole because i dropped my lighter and got pulled over cuz i swerved a bit.
but if u have already gotten whammied. bad news, u will lose your job and you will be fucked because employers have no sympathy for dui/dwi.
UNLESS you get a good lawyer, dont do like i did and hire a shitty lawyer cuz he was recommended. find a DUI Lawyer. he will charge the piss out of you but in the long run you will save way over a grand... your case is smal tho you may be able to fight it.. hide it from your employer and try to get it taken care of before they find out
I agree that driving while impared is a bad idea, but driving while some stupid machine says you drank too much is another. Some people do quite well with more than normal amounts of alcohol in their system.SenorToenails wrote:
Driving while intoxicated is plainly irresponsible and dangerous to everyone else on the road. One cannot contest that fact.Morpheus1229 wrote:
Why don't you take it a step further and say that everybody who drives should be charged with vehicular manslaughter? You don't need to be drunk to kill someone with a car.
The machine isn't inaccurate to the degree that you are not impaired in some manner while getting a drunk reading.Morpheus1229 wrote:
I agree that driving while impared is a bad idea, but driving while some stupid machine says you drank too much is another. Some people do quite well with more than normal amounts of alcohol in their system.SenorToenails wrote:
Driving while intoxicated is plainly irresponsible and dangerous to everyone else on the road. One cannot contest that fact.Morpheus1229 wrote:
Why don't you take it a step further and say that everybody who drives should be charged with vehicular manslaughter? You don't need to be drunk to kill someone with a car.
umm.... wat?nukchebi0 wrote:
The machine isn't inaccurate to the degree that you are not impaired in some manner while getting a drunk reading.Morpheus1229 wrote:
I agree that driving while impared is a bad idea, but driving while some stupid machine says you drank too much is another. Some people do quite well with more than normal amounts of alcohol in their system.SenorToenails wrote:
Driving while intoxicated is plainly irresponsible and dangerous to everyone else on the road. One cannot contest that fact.
Last edited by Morpheus1229 (2008-04-01 23:35:42)
Don't tell me that you are one of those people. The people who think they can drive just fine while completely lit.Morpheus1229 wrote:
I agree that driving while impared is a bad idea, but driving while some stupid machine says you drank too much is another. Some people do quite well with more than normal amounts of alcohol in their system.
I'm generalising? I'm not the one who claimed all DUIs are equivalent to child abusers.Morpheus1229 wrote:
Oh, and good generization, there, internet tough guy.DrunkFace wrote:
The level you are impaired differs from person to person, now consider the differing 'laws' in each country on what is an acceptable BAC... Laws are a human made system and are therefore susceptible to mistakes...
Last edited by DrunkFace (2008-04-02 23:15:38)