Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6948
https://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/77/09/23500977.jpg

In what it claims as an effort to stabilize the economy, the Fed has OK'ed the merger of JP Morgan and the now financially castrated Bear Stearns, once a Wall Street behemoth.

However, in what can only be describe as Wall Street Welfare, the Fed is throwing in a "loan" (as if they're going to get this money back) of $29 billion for the buyout.

As a precaution, they Fed is taking mortgage-backed securities owned by Bear as collateral.

'Among other things, these agreements were necessary and appropriate to maintain stability in our financial system at a critical juncture,'
While I'm sure the Fed means well and all, the stupidity of this decision is gargantuan.

First off, why the hell are we giving $29 Billion to bolster a company that obviously has critical issues with managing money. This very company was notorious for being ruthless in their acquisitions of real estate and assets. They knew exactly what they were doing, they deserve no help what so ever.

And second, it seems incredibly stupid to take as collateral something that could very well be worth nothing. The whole reason Bear Stearns face-planted was due to their binge on mortgage-backed securities, which have pretty much tanked. And guess what the Fed took as collateral.

Paulson acknowledged that this transaction could lead to losses at the NY Fed if those securities lose value, and agreed that in turn, this 'may reduce the net earnings transferred by the FRBNY to the Treasury general fund.'
Gee, if only we had $29 Billion to spend on the people who actually needed it. Not Fortune 500 companies.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7162|Salt Lake City

Yes, yes it is.  Corporate welfare at its finest.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6982
Corporate welfare: extra ivory backscratchers for execs.
Social welfare: food and shelter for the poor.

PS Did New Orleans get $29bn in rebuilding funds?

PPS Who does this company think they are? Iraq? lol

On a serious note I understand why they had to do it. The US financial system could have collapsed and it's still not out of the woods.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-04-02 14:01:28)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina
You can bet that Rush Limbaugh didn't talk about this one much.  He'd rather come down on the poor.

Whatever the case, I actually agree with McCain on this particular issue.  We shouldn't have bailed out Bear Stearns, and we shouldn't bail out homeowners either.  The market engenders a certain amount of risk that shouldn't be subsidized by the government.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6956|Global Command

Turquoise wrote:

You can bet that Rush Limbaugh didn't talk about this one much.  He'd rather come down on the poor.

Whatever the case, I actually agree with McCain on this particular issue.  We shouldn't have bailed out Bear Stearns, and we shouldn't bail out homeowners either.  The market engenders a certain amount of risk that shouldn't be subsidized by the government.
Wrong.
He is against government intervention.


lol, Bears and Stearn holds/held my mortgage papers.

When we signed, we had to sign about ten consent to sell agreements because companies like this were trading papers like poker chips.
We had to agree that our mortgage could be sold to companies I never would hear about according to terms that I have no idea of.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina
So Rush is actually against corporate bailouts too?  Could've fooled me...  He also supports the War on Drugs but is an abuser of oxycontin.  I just figured he was a hypocrite on fiscal policy too....

Still, I would argue that the government should only intervene on making contracts more transparent.  Bailing out people is a mistake, but forcing investors to be more honest is a good thing.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6610|Ireland

Turquoise wrote:

So Rush is actually against corporate bailouts too?  Could've fooled me...  He also supports the War on Drugs but is an abuser of oxycontin.  I just figured he was a hypocrite on fiscal policy too....

Still, I would argue that the government should only intervene on making contracts more transparent.  Bailing out people is a mistake, but forcing investors to be more honest is a good thing.
Fuck, this is the homeowner bailing out his Mortgage company so they can foreclose on his ass.  Home owners are the taxpayers which are forced to bail out these ignorant hicks in wallstreet that write their own rules.

Fuck I wanna see some people put in prison damnit, I want see some rich white people fucking fry.

Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2008-04-02 16:49:16)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6832|North Carolina
I'm right there with you, Lotta.  We should approach this the way we did with Enron.  No bailing out -- it's more like posting bail.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,991|7058|949

I called the government bailout of the credit industry months ago, and this isn't the first.

Then again, it was fairly obvious this was going to happen based on previous examples.

What will be the next big money-credit industry?  I am thinking short-term loans (like Payday Loan) and debt-relief companies (the new mortgage loan industry).

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-04-02 17:51:27)

Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7042|do not disturb

Protectus, Ben Bernanke wants to save the banking system from something we have never seen before, nor want to face. He also believes enough inflation can defeat deflation (as is his case about the Great Depression).

This is far from over. I expect to see Merrell Lynch, CitiGroup, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, and a ton of hedge funds in the same situation as Bear Stears; insolvent over night. The CEO of Bear Stearns said they didn't have a liquidity problem 5 days before their stock crashed and burned, and now Lehman Brothers is borrowing through the discount window, despite saying they didn't need to. You can't trust them, and they will be back at the discount window again. How many Bear Stearn insiders got out before they lost all their investments through them?

Well anyways Bear Stearns was marked to be killed when the next financial crisis happened after they did not help bail out LTCM back in 98. They were the odd man out, and now the crows have come in to kill on another one that fell. That toxic waste (subprime CDOs) is now backing the US dollar. Way to kick foreign investors in the junk. Yea screw them! We are America damn it!

But I agree, screw Wall Street. Let banks fail, let the housing bubble deflate (and screw these realtors suckering in people still), double interest rates, and let the market clean out whatever junk is in the system. You can't stop the market from doing that, so we better just man up before it gets really ugly, but I think that is too late. The country is like an obese person who really needs to lose some weight before he ends up having a massive heart attack.

I'll go out on a limb and say hyperinflation could be here within 2 years, maybe in a few months depending how the pendulum swings. Just a matter of time. But hey, maybe it will erase all that $60 trillion in debt and entitlements David Walker was talking about. What's Ben got up his sleeve? Selling us short.

Last edited by Phrozenbot (2008-04-03 06:05:56)

FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6837|'Murka

CameronPoe wrote:

Corporate welfare: extra ivory backscratchers for execs.
Social welfare: food and shelter for the poor.

PS Did New Orleans get $29bn in rebuilding funds?
Nope. New Orleans got $62.3bn in Federal money.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6982

FEOS wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Corporate welfare: extra ivory backscratchers for execs.
Social welfare: food and shelter for the poor.

PS Did New Orleans get $29bn in rebuilding funds?
Nope. New Orleans got $62.3bn in Federal money.
Commendable I must say.
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6948
Although these guys induce a rage formerly reserved for slutty ex-girlfriends, you have to give them credit: They have balls.

The CEOs of the companies that pretty much created this whole crisis are now touting they are the saviors that stopped "serious damage to the American financial system and the broader economy."

"One thing I can say with confidence: if the private and public parties before you today had not acted in a remarkable collaboration to prevent the fall of Bear Stearns, we would all be facing a far more dire set of challenges," JPMorgan's Dimon said in prepared remarks.
If you burn down the house, you sure as hell don't get to take credit for grabbing the garden hose in your flailing fit of panic. I hate these god damn douche clowns.

@Phrozenbot:

I'm starting to see that the stability of Bear Stearn is probably in the best interests of everyone, it just angers me that one company, one god damn hedge fund clusterfuck, has so much power over the economy that our government has to throw billions at them just to keep us floating.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7042|do not disturb

I completely agree Protectus. They (the banks and the Fed) got us into this mess. But Bear Stearns was just one player in this house of cards. It's part of the shadow banking system, or the massive derivatives market ($400-$516 trillion, whoever you quote) that is largely unregulated because it is too complicated and the risk is spread out all over the place. OTC's, CDO's, CDS's, you name it.

Bear Stearns subprime CDS's were only 10% of the original value once they had to mark them to market, and were very damn near to expose the real value of them all, making every bank that held on to them insolvent. JPmorgan had much more, and they would have been next, so this was really more of a bailout for them than Bear. Although ultimately it was a bail out of the financial sector.

And these turds at Bear Stearns were the best paid CEOs on Wall Street before this debacle happened. 1 year of record profits and somehow people think they are amazing CEOs. Bull. These guys just got lucky, until the real risk management came. And I can't blame them for failing, only that they were too stupid to get into such a shady system. Warren Buffet, arguably the finest modern investor, called credit derivatives "weapons of mass destruction."

However the same story will be happening again soon. I expect Goldman Sachs to be announcing some large losses soon. Are they next? They are just throwing money into a financial black hole. By the time this is over our dollar will be so weak, foreigners will sell off their bonds and the Fed will have to monetize all of it, plus have $13-14 trillion dollars floating around washing up on our shore.

And people think the Fed is good. There is a reason why the founding fathers warned against central banks. You reap what you sow I guess. What happened to democracy in some places when the world went into a worldwide depression back in the 20-30's? I can only imagine what changes might happen here and throughout the world. Will we ditch the dollar for the Amero? NAU?

Last edited by Phrozenbot (2008-04-03 10:02:38)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard