Lieutenant_Jensen
Your cops are corrupt.
+200|6868|fåking denmark
So, what's your BMI? (click link for how to calculate)

Mine is either 17,9 or 18,1, which acording to the table, means I'm underweight.

EDIT:

Last edited by Lieutenant_Jensen (2008-04-05 06:54:04)

Mitch92uK
aka [DBS]Mitch92uK
+192|6712|United Kingdom
21.6 ... but I'm heavier with muscle than fat
pers0nah
Waste Kid
+271|7059|MANCHESTERRR
around 18.6 last time i checked.
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6674|Winland

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6438|Washington DC
I'm in the "healthy" range last I checked (can't be fucked to check now). Bodyfat percentage is a better indicator of body condition than BMI.
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6476|...
20.4
inane little opines
Eldu
Member
+62|6584|Belgium
Woop, seems I'm healthy (18.5).
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|7130
21.5, body fat percentage: 14%
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|7194|Riva, MD
30.4

But I'm not that fat.
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6674|Winland

_j5689_ wrote:

30.4

But I'm not that fat.
You are.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|7044|NYC / Hamburg

too high probs

/fatty
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
jord
Member
+2,382|7155|The North, beyond the wall.
18.5, just inside the normal bit. Which is fucking small compared to the obese section.
r'Eeee
That's how I roll, BITCH!
+311|6925

20.5
GorillaKing798
Too legit to quit
+48|6591|Tampa, Florida
18.1 (cross country and football FTW)
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6888|'Murka

BMI is bogus. Anything that doesn't take the ratio of lean muscle to fat into account is flawed. Much like the abdominal circumference measure, which looks only at waist size without taking height into account (so a 4'3" tall man with a 34" waist is considered just as healthy/fit as a 6'4" man with a 34" waist).
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6885|Somersetshire

FEOS wrote:

BMI is bogus. Anything that doesn't take the ratio of lean muscle to fat into account is flawed.
to true


apprenlt my BMI is just in the acceptable zone, but if you look at me i'm skinny as hell
people think i don't eat lol
i only fit because i have no body fat, just muscle and it adds weight on to me
SizzlingMidget
Member
+39|6776|UK
17.6, skinny.
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6970|N. Ireland
16.9
The#1Spot
Member
+105|7017|byah
27.4
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7320|Reykjavík, Iceland.
26.6

BMI is ghey because it doesn't take muscle into account, I'm not fat at all. (190cm, 96 kg)
BlackKoala
Member
+215|6802
29.6
Peter
Super Awesome Member
+494|6879|dm_maidenhead

kylef wrote:

16.9
Go eat some lard kail
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7243|UK
18.5
delta4bravo*nl*
Dutch Delight
+68|7229
21.6..
did the same on another BMI calculator a while ago, the outcome was 16... these things are not accurate, a professional is the only one who can give a accurate BMI number, by taking fat, build length etc into account.
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6674|Winland

delta4bravo*nl* wrote:

21.6..
did the same on another BMI calculator a while ago, the outcome was 16... these things are not accurate, a professional is the only one who can give a accurate BMI number, by taking fat, build length etc into account.
Then it isn't BMI anymore... It's just some super-advanced fat-calculation.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard