Poll

Was COINTELPRO involved in MLK's assassination?

Yes60%60% - 6
No40%40% - 4
Total: 10
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina
For those of you not familiar with COINTELPRO, this was a series of projects run by the FBI between 1956 and 1971 with the stated intention of subverting radical groups that threatened society, but among their targets were also leaders of the Civil Rights Movement -- including MLK.

For more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

The official story is that James Earl Ray killed MLK by shooting him in the head.  However, the trial and subsequent investigations were reminiscent of the JFK assassination in their mysteries and still unanswered questions.

For more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Lut … assination

What do you guys think?
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6894
Considering President Johnson was one of MLK's greatest allies the answer is clearly no and you're a twit if you think otherwise.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6609|Ireland
The US government only kills blacks by giving them Aids.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7007|SE London

Lotta_Drool wrote:

The US government only kills blacks by giving them Aids.
What about all the ones they execute?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Considering President Johnson was one of MLK's greatest allies the answer is clearly no and you're a twit if you think otherwise.
Considering J. Edgar Hoover was running the FBI at the time, it's not that much of a stretch....

"Martin Luther King, Jr. was a frequent target of investigation. The FBI found no evidence of any crime, but attempted to use tapes of King involved in sexual activity for blackmail. In his 1991 memoirs, Washington Post journalist Carl Rowan asserted that the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to commit suicide."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bu … on#History
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7198|PNW

Turquoise wrote:

[...] COINTELPRO [...]
I sense a conspiracy.

Runs faster on...

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2008-04-11 16:55:14)

Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7148|Eastern PA
I'd say no. But given that, J. Edgar Hoover was a petty, paranoid fuck prone to enormous overreach.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6894

Turquoise wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Considering President Johnson was one of MLK's greatest allies the answer is clearly no and you're a twit if you think otherwise.
Considering J. Edgar Hoover was running the FBI at the time, it's not that much of a stretch....

"Martin Luther King, Jr. was a frequent target of investigation. The FBI found no evidence of any crime, but attempted to use tapes of King involved in sexual activity for blackmail. In his 1991 memoirs, Washington Post journalist Carl Rowan asserted that the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to commit suicide."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bu … on#History
Yes but then Johnson would have known of it and had Hoover dealt with, such a major action by the FBI does not get missed by the president.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina
Are you sure about that, Docta?  9/11 largely happened because of miscommunication between the FBI and the CIA.  Our current president definitely missed a lot of red flags leading up to 9/11.

While LBJ was a considerably better president than Bush, I wouldn't exactly assume he was incapable of missing the machinations of the FBI.  I just find the official story on MLK's death to be rather suspect.
imortal
Member
+240|7091|Austin, TX

Turquoise wrote:

Are you sure about that, Docta?  9/11 largely happened because of miscommunication between the FBI and the CIA.  Our current president definitely missed a lot of red flags leading up to 9/11.

While LBJ was a considerably better president than Bush, I wouldn't exactly assume he was incapable of missing the machinations of the FBI.  I just find the official story on MLK's death to be rather suspect.
Ok, are we going to start the 9/11 stuff again?  I will agree that several warning signs were missed, but hindsight makes it easy for us to say "you should have known," without seeing all the detrius it was buried in at the time.  I think the greatest culprit was the lack of communication between the federal agencies.  Of course, the communications lack was a deliberate stragegy of the previous administration.

Ok, before you all start yelling replies, I am sure the Clinton administration had a valid reason for putting it there, and 9/11 was an unintended concequence.  And that the Bush II administration had several months to reverse the policy, but that I doubt they had seen the need to until 9/11.  That hindsight thing works both ways, and we need to cut slack both ways.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6955|Global Command
9/11 gave the government the excuse to bloat itself and explode it's power.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6831|North Carolina

imortal wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Are you sure about that, Docta?  9/11 largely happened because of miscommunication between the FBI and the CIA.  Our current president definitely missed a lot of red flags leading up to 9/11.

While LBJ was a considerably better president than Bush, I wouldn't exactly assume he was incapable of missing the machinations of the FBI.  I just find the official story on MLK's death to be rather suspect.
Ok, are we going to start the 9/11 stuff again?  I will agree that several warning signs were missed, but hindsight makes it easy for us to say "you should have known," without seeing all the detrius it was buried in at the time.  I think the greatest culprit was the lack of communication between the federal agencies.  Of course, the communications lack was a deliberate stragegy of the previous administration.

Ok, before you all start yelling replies, I am sure the Clinton administration had a valid reason for putting it there, and 9/11 was an unintended concequence.  And that the Bush II administration had several months to reverse the policy, but that I doubt they had seen the need to until 9/11.  That hindsight thing works both ways, and we need to cut slack both ways.
Sure, that sounds reasonable, but it still doesn't detract from my initial point.  A president doesn't necessarily know everything the FBI is doing.  One of the more recent presidents who would have been exceptionally aware of the FBI's actions was the first Bush, because of his personal connections to the intelligence community (and his former status as director of the CIA).

I just doubt LBJ was that focused on the FBI and COINTELPRO mostly because of how Vietnam overshadowed everything else at the time.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard