Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6711|eng
Well? Do you?

I think that people should be able to die how they want, when they want and where they want, because it's their life and therefore their decision..
#rekt
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6715|Éire
Yes I do. We're humane enough to put down animals that are suffering and yet we let humans suffer on until the bitter agonising end.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Braddock wrote:

Yes I do. We're humane enough to put down animals that are suffering and yet we let humans suffer on until the bitter agonising end.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7046|London, England

SenorToenails wrote:

ig wrote:

wat
j/k

Braddock wrote:

Yes I do. We're humane enough to put down animals that are suffering and yet we let humans suffer on until the bitter agonising end.
Agreed.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

ig wrote:

wat
j/k
Damn You!
Tetrino
International OMGWTFBBQ
+200|7155|Uhh... erm...
I don't mind its existence, but I personally feel that God is the one who ultimately decides when and how we die.

In before someone slams me for bringing religion into this.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6577|what

There are many cases where it is the best solution, to stop long term suffering. The only problem I could possibly have with it, is if the person wishing to be euthanised was pregnant. But again, that could be a very grey area in right and wrong.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
FlemishHCmaniac
Member
+147|6837|Belgium
Funny you should bring up euthanasia because it has become an actual topic again in Belgium. Hugo Claus (a very famous writer) took the decision to end his life because he suffered from Alzheimer's. Cardinal Danneels (pretty much the leading figure of the Roman Catholic church here) criticised his decision and said that 'it isn't a heroic act to avoid suffering'. I wonder if he was diagnosed with a terrible uncurable disease, would he still hold on to his opinion..

wiki wrote:

Claus suffered from Alzheimer's disease and requested his life to be terminated through euthanasia at the Middelheim Ziekenhuis in Antwerp on March 19, 2008[7]. Euthanasia is legal in Belgium.

The Belgian Minister of Culture stated, "I knew him well enough to know that he wanted to depart with pride and dignity"[8]. Former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt said that he imagined the onset of Alzheimer's must have been "inevitable and unbearable torture". "I can live with the fact that he decided thus", he said, "because he left us as a great glowing star, right on time, just before he would have collapsed into a black hole"[5].

His death by euthanasia has received criticism from the Roman Catholic Church and the Belgian Alzheimer League[9]. The Belgian Alzheimer League respects Claus' decision, but believes the media coverage of his death neglects other options for Alzheimer patients.
Personally I believe a human being has the right to end his life if there's a substantial reason for it. Also people who have been in a comatose state for years can be granted permission for euthanasia. However, children is pretty touchy subject. And I think that it would be case dependent.
PuckMercury
6 x 9 = 42
+298|6952|Portland, OR USA

Braddock wrote:

Yes I do. We're humane enough to put down animals that are suffering and yet we let humans suffer on until the bitter agonising end.
exactly, and to hell with the arguement of "We're different than animals" et al.  I am an adamant supporter of it myself.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

FlemishHCmaniac wrote:

Funny you should bring up euthanasia because it has become an actual topic again in Belgium. Hugo Claus (a very famous writer) took the decision to end his life because he suffered from Alzheimer's. Cardinal Danneels (pretty much the leading figure of the Roman Catholic church here) criticised his decision and said that 'it isn't a heroic act to avoid suffering'. I wonder if he was diagnosed with a terrible uncurable disease, would he still hold on to his opinion..
Others agree with Hugo's sentiment.  I immediately think of one other person who took his own life after being diagnosed with a painful, incurable disease.
On March 14, 1932, George Eastman committed suicide. He left a suicide note that read, "To my Friends, My work is done. Why wait?"
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6980
Yes I believe in the youth in asia.
Switch
Knee Deep In Clunge
+489|6888|Tyne & Wear, England

CameronPoe wrote:

Yes I believe in the youth in asia.
Badum chhh.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Tetrino
International OMGWTFBBQ
+200|7155|Uhh... erm...

CameronPoe wrote:

Yes I believe in the youth in asia.
Took me about 2 seconds to realize it and laugh. >_>
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6916|Northern California

CameronPoe wrote:

Yes I believe in the youth in asia.
dang..beat me to it!
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6870|The Land of Scott Walker
I oppose it.  If we can just march down the hospital and ask them to hook up a lethal injection that isn't very healthy for society.  We as humans tend to follow the path of least resistance and sometimes death appears to be easier than pressing on through life. 

People choosing to die is not the only issue in the euthanasia debate.  What about physicians making the decision for the individual without their consent?
Home
Section.80
+447|7272|Seattle, Washington, USA

Stingray24 wrote:

I oppose it.  If we can just march down the hospital and ask them to hook up a lethal injection that isn't very healthy for society.  We as humans tend to follow the path of least resistance and sometimes death appears to be easier than pressing on through life. 

People choosing to die is not the only issue in the euthanasia debate.  What about physicians making the decision for the individual without their consent?
But if euthanasia was allowed, in the way I support it, you couldn't just walk up and say "Euthanize me please." You'd have to have sufficient reason. And physicians should not be able to make that choice without the consent of their patient, or maybe in some cases the consent of the closest family.

My friend had an aunt die just last week. She was hooked up to the machine, which was pumping nutrients into her stomach and helping her breathe etc. She asked to be let go. Because we can't euthanize, she had to lie there and basically starve/suffocate to death. It took her almost an entire day of suffering. If euthanasia was legal, she could have gone peacefully.
hurricane2oo5
Do One Ya Mug !!!
+176|7189|mansfield
I think if your in pain , or you just want to die then its your own free will. i do believe in euthanasia
Drakef
Cheeseburger Logicist
+117|6787|Vancouver
Right to live, right to die.

As Sue Rodriguez said, "Whose body is this?"
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7196|PNW

Home wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

I oppose it.  If we can just march down the hospital and ask them to hook up a lethal injection that isn't very healthy for society.  We as humans tend to follow the path of least resistance and sometimes death appears to be easier than pressing on through life. 

People choosing to die is not the only issue in the euthanasia debate.  What about physicians making the decision for the individual without their consent?
But if euthanasia was allowed, in the way I support it, you couldn't just walk up and say "Euthanize me please." You'd have to have sufficient reason. And physicians should not be able to make that choice without the consent of their patient, or maybe in some cases the consent of the closest family.

My friend had an aunt die just last week. She was hooked up to the machine, which was pumping nutrients into her stomach and helping her breathe etc. She asked to be let go. Because we can't euthanize, she had to lie there and basically starve/suffocate to death. It took her almost an entire day of suffering. If euthanasia was legal, she could have gone peacefully.
Exactly. It wouldn't be like a Futurama suicide booth.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6715|Éire

Stingray24 wrote:

I oppose it.  If we can just march down the hospital and ask them to hook up a lethal injection that isn't very healthy for society.  We as humans tend to follow the path of least resistance and sometimes death appears to be easier than pressing on through life. 

People choosing to die is not the only issue in the euthanasia debate.  What about physicians making the decision for the individual without their consent?
Do you support the death penalty by any chance?
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7074

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Home wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

I oppose it.  If we can just march down the hospital and ask them to hook up a lethal injection that isn't very healthy for society.  We as humans tend to follow the path of least resistance and sometimes death appears to be easier than pressing on through life. 

People choosing to die is not the only issue in the euthanasia debate.  What about physicians making the decision for the individual without their consent?
But if euthanasia was allowed, in the way I support it, you couldn't just walk up and say "Euthanize me please." You'd have to have sufficient reason. And physicians should not be able to make that choice without the consent of their patient, or maybe in some cases the consent of the closest family.

My friend had an aunt die just last week. She was hooked up to the machine, which was pumping nutrients into her stomach and helping her breathe etc. She asked to be let go. Because we can't euthanize, she had to lie there and basically starve/suffocate to death. It took her almost an entire day of suffering. If euthanasia was legal, she could have gone peacefully.
Exactly. It wouldn't be like a Futurama suicide booth.
Somewhat disappointingly...
Marconius
One-eyed Wonder Mod
+368|7119|San Francisco
I absolutely believe in and support euthanasia.  It's all about the Quality of your life, not the Quantity.

Sustaining a beating heart and pumping lungs via machines and eating through a tube is not life.  We had to make the decision to turn off my aunt's life support system last April as her breast cancer had spread to her liver and brain.  She was unable to breathe on her own, so we had to turn the machines off to end her suffering.  I wouldn't wish extended suffering like that on anyone.
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7071
6 months to live with precedures and all that jazz - yes

Healthy people with emotional problems - no
Smithereener
Member
+138|6740|California
Although the Hippocrates Oath forbids it (I believe, did a report on this my freshman year, don't remember much), I believe it's more important that a patient doesn't have to suffer any pain that they do not wish to bear. Especially if they have some terminal disease and have to be stuck on massive doses of painkillers to feel OK.

However, the one area where I'm not too sure is if the patient is in a coma. Remember Terry Schiavo and the whole controversy surrounding her? Although I would personally hate to be stuck in a coma for an indefinite amount of time and would rather die, I can't exactly say the same for others. Those in a coma can't really decide for themselves; do we let their family decide for them?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6980
If I contracted Alzheimer's I would want to be put out of my misery. The same would apply for several other ailments. I would travel to a country where I could receive the treatment legally. Everybody should be entitled to a humane death.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard