Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

^^ Reminds me of a briefer history of time. The part where the Catholic Church banned Copernican heliocentrism. Galileo traveled to Rome to argue that the bible was being allegorical when contradicting common sense. Something people in this forum don't get.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Kmarion wrote:

^^ Reminds me of a briefer history of time. The part where the Catholic Church banned Copernican heliocentrism. Galileo traveled to Rome to argue that the bible was being allegorical when contradicting common sense. Something people in this forum don't get.
People in this forum look at how well things turned out for Galileo.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

SenorToenails wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

^^ Reminds me of a briefer history of time. The part where the Catholic Church banned Copernican heliocentrism. Galileo traveled to Rome to argue that the bible was being allegorical when contradicting common sense. Something people in this forum don't get.
People in this forum look at how well things turned out for Galileo.
I think it's safe to say the Catholic church has evolved. To have this convo in 1616 would have been troublesome to say the least..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Kmarion wrote:

I think it's safe to say the Catholic church has evolved. To have this convo in 1616 would have been troublesome to say the least..lol
Oh, I agree 100%.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Xbone Stormsurgezz
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Kmarion wrote:

http://media.putfile.com/Galileo-51
Thanks. 
Mutantbear
Semi Constructive Criticism
+1,431|6389|London, England

I saw a commercial for the movie, seemed pretty good
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ https://i.imgur.com/Xj4f2.png
PureFodder
Member
+225|6710
Ok, lets teach the scientific theory of creationism to our kids.

"I don't know"

Now we'll get on with the more important theory of evolution. There is nothing to teach in creationism. All the theory says is that there's stuff on Earth that some people can't think of an way for it to form. Any speculation is stupid as there's obviously no mechanism or evidence for it so we'll happily throw that out of the window. If creationists could show me the fossil of an alien or explain to me the method by which a God can create life then possibly we can talk, but so far the argument has been, 'look at this, I don't understand how this formed, it must be God'. It's the theory of 'I'm either too stupid or don't have enough evidence yet to figure this out'.

If you want to teach creationism at least use it's actual name. Defeatism.
GorillaTicTacs
Member
+231|6798|Kyiv, Ukraine

PureFodder wrote:

If you want to teach creationism at least use it's actual name. Defeatism.
I prefer to call it the "My God is the filler of cracks" theory.  Creationists, instead of seeing or acknowledging God is behind the wall, they see God as the filler of gaps in the wall.  The problem is that those cracks are always getting forced closed, as our knowledge increases, God gets pushed out.

This isn't true.  It is the product of a very small mind, and a childish perception of theism.  The problem with this theory is that in order to keep God, you must stop scientific advance as one replaces the other...knowledge replaces ignorance.  Creationists (or ID believers, or Flat-earthers, whatever) are effectively saying God = Ignorance.  This is why I find Creationism so completely insulting to my own faith.  I find it equally insulting that they pretend to speak for "all Christians" or even "all people of monotheistic faith" in their beliefs.  The God I believe in is not the funk in some ass crack waiting to be scraped out by a scientific method.  Fundamentally, it doesn't work like that.
djphetal
Go Ducks.
+346|6760|Oregon

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I find it interesting that the same people who preach tolerance for Islam sneer and scoff at other religions.
I think you need to look at the context of these debates.
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7147|Eastern PA
I lolled at this review:
One of the sleaziest documentaries to arrive in a very long time, “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” is a conspiracy-theory rant masquerading as investigative inquiry.

Positing the theory of intelligent design as a valid scientific hypothesis, the film frames the refusal of “big science” to agree as nothing less than an assault on free speech. Interviewees, including the scientist Richard Sternberg, claim that questioning Darwinism led to their expulsion from the scientific fold (the film relies extensively on the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy — after this, therefore because of this), while our genial audience surrogate, the actor and multihyphenate Ben Stein, nods sympathetically. (Mr. Stein is also a freelance columnist who writes Everybody’s Business for The New York Times.)

Prominent evolutionary biologists, like the author and Oxford professor Richard Dawkins — accurately identified on screen as an “atheist” — are provided solely to construct, in cleverly edited slices, an inevitable connection between Darwinism and godlessness. Blithely ignoring the vital distinction between social and scientific Darwinism, the film links evolution theory to fascism (as well as abortion, euthanasia and eugenics), shamelessly invoking the Holocaust with black-and-white film of Nazi gas chambers and mass graves.

Every few minutes familiar — and ideologically unrelated — images interrupt the talking heads: a fist-shaking Nikita S. Khrushchev; Charlton Heston being subdued by a water hose in “Planet of the Apes.” This is not argument, it’s circus, a distraction from the film’s contempt for precision and intellectual rigor. This goes further than a willful misunderstanding of the scientific method. The film suggests, for example, that Dr. Sternberg lost his job at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History because of intellectual discrimination but neglects to inform us that he was actually not an employee but rather an unpaid research associate who had completed his three-year term.

Mixing physical apples and metaphysical oranges at every turn “Expelled” is an unprincipled propaganda piece that insults believers and nonbelievers alike. In its fudging, eliding and refusal to define terms, the movie proves that the only expulsion here is of reason itself.

“Expelled” is rated PG (Parental guidance suggested). It has smoking guns and drunken logic.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Masques wrote:

I lolled at this review:
This is the ultimate review: New York Times posts record loss.
I lolled.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6870|The Land of Scott Walker

PureFodder wrote:

All the theory says is that there's stuff on Earth that some people can't think of an way for it to form ... so far the argument has been, 'look at this, I don't understand how this formed, it must be God'.
*buzzer*  Scientists are finding in their research what current evolutionary theory fails to explain, not "some people".
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Stingray24 wrote:

*buzzer*  Scientists are finding in their research what current evolutionary theory fails to explain, not "some people".
That does not automatically imply that god did it.  God is not science.
Schittloaf
not fulla schit
+23|6328|MN
who made teh big bang ? who made the gasses and the atoms ? what does the bible share with 3 other religions? btw try to win Ben Stine's money! evolution doesnt explain anything just assumes... do you know how the scientists date ?? carbon dating accurate?? read up boys then spew your opinions.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6555|North Tonawanda, NY

Schittloaf wrote:

who made teh big bang ? who made the gasses and the atoms ?
What made god?  These arguments are foolish, especially when used to try and debase science.

Schittloaf wrote:

what does the bible share with 3 other religions?
A story for creation.

Schittloaf wrote:

btw try to win Ben Stine's money!
I used to love that show.

Schittloaf wrote:

evolution doesnt explain anything just assumes... do you know how the scientists date ?? carbon dating accurate?? read up boys then spew your opinions.
What's wrong with isotope dating methods?  I understand how it is done, and I believe it to be accurate.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7196|PNW

Havok wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I find it interesting that the same people who preach tolerance for Islam sneer and scoff at other religions.
Islam has never imposed itself on my life.  Christianity has.

I find it interesting that the defenders of intelligent design cherry-pick the posts that they wish to respond to and ignore the ones that refute their claims.
I find it interesting that someone in Florida notes the lack of Islamic imposition in his life...

I think it's possible that an intelligence could've had a hand in the elements of the universe, but not in the storybook "mindlessly snap your fingers and it is so" fashion. My view of 'God' is as the ultimate scientist.

Either that or we're all escaped monkeys from a universal zoo who just haven't been rounded up yet, and the keeper is still doing community service for letting us out on His watch.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2008-04-18 15:03:36)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6830|North Carolina
Hey Newbie, there's another side to your argument regarding Islam.  While you make a good point, it's also true that a lot of people who fear Islam happen to be creationist -- not realizing that Muslims are generally more likely to believe in creationism than Christians are....

To me, the only notable differences between Christianity and Islam are that Christianity is focused on a pacifist while Islam focuses on a warmonger, and that a considerably higher portion of Muslims are violent extremists than among Christians.

Either way, young-Earth creationism is ridiculous.  Old-Earth creationism can be compatible with the Big Bang and evolution, but unfortunately, too many evangelicals and Muslims can't see that.

Last edited by Turquoise (2008-04-18 15:16:45)

Raga86
Member
+6|6910

Stingray24 wrote:

*buzzer*  Scientists are finding in their research what current evolutionary theory fails to explain, not "some people".
Pardon me but can I have a link to an example of this?
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6870|The Land of Scott Walker
I don't have time to do your research for you.  There's plenty of books on it, hit the library.
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6946

Stingray24 wrote:

I don't have time to do your research for you.  There's plenty of books on it, hit the library.
Ha ha, my favorite phrase of all time.

Just make any claim you want. If no one believes you, its their problem, they have to look it up. Burden of proof? Naaaahhhhh.

By the way, God sent down a proclamation that evolution is the correct theory. And he is made of chocolate. Don't believe me, look it up yourself.

As far as ID is concerned, they have every right guaranteed by the First Amendment to say whatever the hell they want to. However, if they want their theory to be taken seriously in the scientific community, they have to play by the rules of everyone else; all claims have to be verifiable and repeatable. Otherwise, we'd still study alchemy.

ID'ers may call it discrimination, I call it just keeping the scientific gene pool clean.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7196|PNW

Turquoise wrote:

Hey Newbie, there's another side to your argument regarding Islam.  While you make a good point, it's also true that a lot of people who fear Islam happen to be creationist -- not realizing that Muslims are generally more likely to believe in creationism than Christians are....

To me, the only notable differences between Christianity and Islam are that Christianity is focused on a pacifist while Islam focuses on a warmonger, and that a considerably higher portion of Muslims are violent extremists than among Christians.

Either way, young-Earth creationism is ridiculous.  Old-Earth creationism can be compatible with the Big Bang and evolution, but unfortunately, too many evangelicals and Muslims can't see that.
First point: can't argue.
Second point: In the end, we're a warlike species.
Third point: I love the salivating glazed-eye stare young-Earthers get when talking about their idea of how things happened.
LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6804|MN

SenorToenails wrote:

What's wrong with isotope dating methods?  I understand how it is done, and I believe it to be accurate.
http://www.allaboutarchaeology.org/accu … ng-faq.htm

Basically they assume several key areas of Carbon facts.  They assume that the decay of carbon 14 is constant and they assume the levels and ratio of carbon 14 and 12 have remained constant.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6830|North Carolina

LividBovine wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

What's wrong with isotope dating methods?  I understand how it is done, and I believe it to be accurate.
http://www.allaboutarchaeology.org/accu … ng-faq.htm

Basically they assume several key areas of Carbon facts.  They assume that the decay of carbon 14 is constant and they assume the levels and ratio of carbon 14 and 12 have remained constant.
While it is true that carbon dating has its faults, the fact remains that assuming the Earth is only 6,000 years old is just stupid.
LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6804|MN
Perhaps.  But that argument is based on your opinion. 

My post was answering senortoenails.  He wanted to know what was wrong with this particular testing method. 

At least I steered clear of all the more biased sites
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard