i always like a good fiction story!
Zoomed right into the faint watermark "H9" (assumed copyright) on Jesus' head. That's kind of cool, though!
Computing: CPU: 2 Two Quad Core AMD Opteron™ processors
16 Gigabyte RAM memory
2 Terabyte hard disk space
Wow...
16 Gigabyte RAM memory
2 Terabyte hard disk space
Wow...
i always like a blatant attack on organized religion!BlackKoala wrote:
i always like a good fiction story!
Fake
Jesus wasn't even white (or at least, he didn't have light brown/blonde hair - The guy was Jewish remember, he looked more like an Arab or those real Jews that aren't Polish/German)
Jesus wasn't even white (or at least, he didn't have light brown/blonde hair - The guy was Jewish remember, he looked more like an Arab or those real Jews that aren't Polish/German)
of course he wasn't,but different cultures depict him differently so they can better relate to the faith.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
Fake
Jesus wasn't even white (or at least, he didn't have light brown/blonde hair - The guy was Jewish remember, he looked more like an Arab or those real Jews that aren't Polish/German)
someone post that big ass picture that was like a cartoon town or some shit
jesus has nits
he forgot the shampoo the night before?SamTheMan:D wrote:
jesus has nits

lol it was lovepixel- I saved it, its 10kx10kEye-GiZzLe wrote:
someone post that big ass picture that was like a cartoon town or some shit
I love the inability to go ONE FUCKING THREAD WITH EVEN A REMOTE RELIGIOUS THEME WITHOUT THIS KIND OF SHIT.aj0404 wrote:
i always like a blatant attack on organized religion!BlackKoala wrote:
i always like a good fiction story!
Now, on topic... that's pretty cool. One of the most important paintings of all time deserves to be rendered in this high a resolution. Quite awesome. I just wish that music didn't play.
qfeSamTheMan:D wrote:
jesus has tits
and yeah, jesus was a chicano
On a related point...

Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?

Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
Dunno, but that guy is definetly trying to get a handfulScorpion0x17 wrote:
On a related point...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8383/marycc7.png
Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
HahaLT.Victim wrote:
Dunno, but that guy is definetly trying to get a handfulScorpion0x17 wrote:
On a related point...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8383/marycc7.png
Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
Original version here.

i believe it looks like a woman because john is generally depicted looking more feminine.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
On a related point...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8383/marycc7.png
Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
Well, then question just becomes, why is 'John' generally depicted looking more feminine?jason85 wrote:
i believe it looks like a woman because john is generally depicted looking more feminine.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
On a related point...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8383/marycc7.png
Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
It's Mary Magdalene; she is depicted in the original Da Vinci's 'Last Supper' painting, but in some reprints; she is airbrushed out.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
On a related point...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8383/marycc7.png
Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
probably for the same reasons jesus is depicted as being white, i suppose.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Well, then question just becomes, why is 'John' generally depicted looking more feminine?jason85 wrote:
i believe it looks like a woman because john is generally depicted looking more feminine.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
On a related point...
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/8383/marycc7.png
Would someone care to tell me how this isn't clearly, and obviously, a female?
In 20 years, this res will be standardized... And streaming off Youtube.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
What, because, as aj0404 says, different cultures depict him differently so they can better relate to the faith?jason85 wrote:
probably for the same reasons jesus is depicted as being white, i suppose.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Well, then question just becomes, why is 'John' generally depicted looking more feminine?jason85 wrote:
i believe it looks like a woman because john is generally depicted looking more feminine.
How does making 'John' feminine make it easy to relate to the faith?
i meant inaccuracies in the retelling or perceptions.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
What, because, as aj0404 says, different cultures depict him differently so they can better relate to the faith?jason85 wrote:
probably for the same reasons jesus is depicted as being white, i suppose.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Well, then question just becomes, why is 'John' generally depicted looking more feminine?
How does making 'John' feminine make it easy to relate to the faith?