When are they going to release the real thing that you don't have to pay for if you want to use it more than once?
yeah, what kind of bs is that? we have to pay now? i have a feeling they're going to lose most of their users.ghettoperson wrote:
When are they going to release the real thing that you don't have to pay for if you want to use it more than once?
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
They wont lose their users, they will however get their software pirated a hell of a lot more.haffeysucks wrote:
yeah, what kind of bs is that? we have to pay now? i have a feeling they're going to lose most of their users.ghettoperson wrote:
When are they going to release the real thing that you don't have to pay for if you want to use it more than once?
Touche.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
They wont lose their users, they will however get their software pirated a hell of a lot more.haffeysucks wrote:
yeah, what kind of bs is that? we have to pay now? i have a feeling they're going to lose most of their users.ghettoperson wrote:
When are they going to release the real thing that you don't have to pay for if you want to use it more than once?
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Before you try it, remember it's Vista SP1, DX10 only. For XP or DX9, keep using the 06 version.
Thanks, almost wasted my timeDe_Jappe wrote:
Before you try it, remember it's Vista SP1, DX10 only. For XP or DX9, keep using the 06 version.
Woo, woo, woo! The only system requirements I fill are the disk space and RAM.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Yep, I'm in the same boat. I would even have to buy a new monitor to actually run the default tests:Freezer7Pro wrote:
Woo, woo, woo! The only system requirements I fill are the disk space and RAM.
Recommendation: Capable of 1920x1200 resolution (Needed to run every Preset)
Ditto. I wonder what the hell they're thinking with that, almost nobody has got 1920x1200 monitors... Maybe 1680x1050 or 1920x1080, but not 1920x1200.SenorToenails wrote:
Yep, I'm in the same boat. I would even have to buy a new monitor to actually run the default tests:Freezer7Pro wrote:
Woo, woo, woo! The only system requirements I fill are the disk space and RAM.Recommendation: Capable of 1920x1200 resolution (Needed to run every Preset)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Me and snipy have it.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Ditto. I wonder what the hell they're thinking with that, almost nobody has got 1920x1200 monitors... Maybe 1680x1050 or 1920x1080, but not 1920x1200.SenorToenails wrote:
Yep, I'm in the same boat. I would even have to buy a new monitor to actually run the default tests:Freezer7Pro wrote:
Woo, woo, woo! The only system requirements I fill are the disk space and RAM.Recommendation: Capable of 1920x1200 resolution (Needed to run every Preset)
But a majority of people don't..Sup wrote:
Me and snipy have it.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Ditto. I wonder what the hell they're thinking with that, almost nobody has got 1920x1200 monitors... Maybe 1680x1050 or 1920x1080, but not 1920x1200.SenorToenails wrote:
Yep, I'm in the same boat. I would even have to buy a new monitor to actually run the default tests:Freezer7Pro wrote:
Woo, woo, woo! The only system requirements I fill are the disk space and RAM.
I'll put up a poll.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
P5539
CPU 5973
GPU 5408
not much eh
CPU 5973
GPU 5408
not much eh
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
umm...lol?Beduin wrote:
P5539
CPU 5973
GPU 5408
not much eh
Holy shit batman necroposting
I has 1920X1200. Suck it.
Samsung 245B here.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
I has 1920X1200. Suck it.
and Samsung 245B plus here.Sup wrote:
Samsung 245B here.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
I has 1920X1200. Suck it.
Whats the difference between these two anyway? Btw heres a thread for you: http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=107267Swope wrote:
and Samsung 245B plus here.Sup wrote:
Samsung 245B here.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
I has 1920X1200. Suck it.
afaik the dynamic contrast and maybe another panel, but who knows.Sup wrote:
Whats the difference between these two anyway? Btw heres a thread for you: http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=107267Swope wrote:
and Samsung 245B plus here.Sup wrote:
Samsung 245B here.