Lucien wrote:
Parker wrote:
Vilham wrote:
If they hadnt made such a short poor quality game they might have sold more, good to see they arent willing to take responsibility for that choice though. This is the exact kind of thing you should expect if you focus too heavily on graphics.
here in the real world, theres this thing called money.
businesses NEED it in order to survive. if a bunch of little nerds want to get e-revenge on a company that produced a "short poor quality game", by essentially stealing it, they cant make money on said product.
what they did here is make a smart business decision.
but by your theory, they almost invited this problem and "arent willing to take responsibility", for making a game that people steal.
that makes sense......somehow.
It does, people were willing to pirate it but not buy it because it simply wasn't that good. There are lots of people who pirate and buy games equally, depending on the game itself. The developers decided to go with consoles because those people will be far more likely to buy it instead of pirate it.
Also, please don't say things like "a bunch of nerds want to get e-revenge". If you have a point to make, make it without having to say "you are wrong, and you are also wrong because I insult you."
well then everything is alright.
i see.....if i make a knife that has defects in it, people are allowed to steal it from me.....right on.
wow, now i fully understand how the world works, that makes perfect sense.
would you rather me call them "a bunch of criminals that want to get e-revenge"?
cause thats what it breaks down to.
people think that a product isnt worth their money, so they just steal it.
nope, sorry......back here in reality, that shit doesnt work so well.
just because its computer software, doesnt make it right.
in fact, it has driven this company FURTHER away from supporting PC games.
GG nerds.
