.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6925|The Twilight Zone
Whats the point in this thread? Explain plz.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6813|Atlanta, Georgia

.Sup wrote:

Whats the point in this thread? Explain plz.
For teh lulz if you cannot understand simple things.
GR34
Member
+215|7016|ALBERTA> CANADA

SgtSlutter wrote:

OH SHI- indeed
LaidBackNinja
Pony Slaystation
+343|7181|Charlie One Alpha

CrazeD wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

maef wrote:

Wow.

That was probably the worst depiction of a nuclear blast I have ever seen.
Have you ever been in one? I assume not, and in which case, how do you know?
Well, it makes no sense to be turned to charcoal before the blast even hits you.


EDIT:

avman633 wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

Have you guys not seen Terminator 2 lol?

That was a vision she (Sarah Conner) had. That was what would have happened if they didn't stop Skynet.
Never saw Terminator 1 or 2. Barely remember the 3rd one
Wow, that must have made no sense at all without watching 1&2 first.
Actually, the blast in that scene has been said to be the most REALISTIC depiction of a nuclear blast ever shown in a film. You obviously know jack shit about physics. They burned because of the heat radiation, which travels WITH THE SPEED OF LIGHT. The blast wave that blows everything away travels much slower.

Terminator 2 rocks. You guys fail epically.
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
The_Lance_117
CANADA STRONG
+110|6408|CANADA
1337 divided by 0.
RoosterCantrell
Goodbye :)
+399|6951|Somewhere else

CrazeD wrote:

avman633 wrote:

CrazeD wrote:


That was from Terminator 2...
I didn't know the creators of Terminator 2 had no conscience. They fucking burned a baby, a child and a mother.
Have you guys not seen Terminator 2 lol?

That was a vision she (Sarah Conner) had. That was what would have happened if they didn't stop Skynet.
Well, accroding to Terminator 3, they didn't stop skynet... But, I disregard that movie, since it was asuch an epic piece of shit.

The cars getting "reprogrammed" and suddenly have the ability to drive... I GROANED at that one.
CrazeD
Member
+368|7144|Maine

RoosterCantrell wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

avman633 wrote:


I didn't know the creators of Terminator 2 had no conscience. They fucking burned a baby, a child and a mother.
Have you guys not seen Terminator 2 lol?

That was a vision she (Sarah Conner) had. That was what would have happened if they didn't stop Skynet.
Well, accroding to Terminator 3, they didn't stop skynet... But, I disregard that movie, since it was asuch an epic piece of shit.

The cars getting "reprogrammed" and suddenly have the ability to drive... I GROANED at that one.
Right, but they delayed it .. I think, or just found out it wasn't going to happen yet.

I haven't seen them for quite a few years so, yeah.
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7238|UK

CrazeD wrote:

RoosterCantrell wrote:

CrazeD wrote:


Have you guys not seen Terminator 2 lol?

That was a vision she (Sarah Conner) had. That was what would have happened if they didn't stop Skynet.
Well, accroding to Terminator 3, they didn't stop skynet... But, I disregard that movie, since it was asuch an epic piece of shit.

The cars getting "reprogrammed" and suddenly have the ability to drive... I GROANED at that one.
Right, but they delayed it .. I think, or just found out it wasn't going to happen yet.

I haven't seen them for quite a few years so, yeah.
Indeed they did. They could never stop the future from happening only delay it.
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6879|Somersetshire




lol, the don't explode, they cancel each other
maef
Member
+67|7155|Tulln, Austria

LaidBackNinja wrote:

CrazeD wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:


Have you ever been in one? I assume not, and in which case, how do you know?
Well, it makes no sense to be turned to charcoal before the blast even hits you.


EDIT:

avman633 wrote:

Never saw Terminator 1 or 2. Barely remember the 3rd one
Wow, that must have made no sense at all without watching 1&2 first.
Actually, the blast in that scene has been said to be the most REALISTIC depiction of a nuclear blast ever shown in a film. You obviously know jack shit about physics. They burned because of the heat radiation, which travels WITH THE SPEED OF LIGHT. The blast wave that blows everything away travels much slower.

Terminator 2 rocks. You guys fail epically.
Right, and that has been said by whom?

I mean, firstly I was missing that distinctive double-flash you always hear about, but that's the least of them all.
Of course there is thermal radiation with a nuclear explosion, but do you think that it actually makes you go up in flames, screaming? Not just burn you, no, really light you on fire? Oh, and all that without doing any significant damage to other things like the playground equipment.
And then comes the blast wave, blowing the ash-statue-like remains of the humans to pieces. Except for the burning chick of course, who still hangs around screaming. No, the blast wave has other plans for her, like ripping the burnt flesh off of her skeleton, which just keeps standing there, clinging to the (perfectly intact) chain-link fence.

Yeah, sounds accurate to me.

Edit: BBcode failure.

Last edited by maef (2008-05-02 10:19:45)

SplinterStrike
Roamer
+250|6882|Eskimo land. AKA Canada.
Captain Falcon, WMD extraordinaire.
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|7049|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

Tehremos wrote:





lol, the don't explode, they cancel each other
Dont even try this with us...we all know that it either CTD or do atomic blast....tsss....Cancel themself...


stkhoplite
Banned
+564|6951|Sheffield-England
Final Falcon Punch > 2 Falcon Punches

Last edited by stkhoplite (2008-05-03 02:34:35)

belldawg
Serial Jay-Walker
+52|6455|Perth, indian ocean
https://img229.imageshack.us/img229/6382/falconpunchms0.gif

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard