A well-managed PC can do everything a console can, and much, much more. I don't have any major interest in the consoles, as they're just simple and limited, for people who want to "just play". I prefer having a PC that I can upgrade after needs instead of a console that, when it gets outdated, is screwed.Ender2309 wrote:
oh stfu already. both systems have their strengths and weaknesses you pussy. you're jealous and you know it.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Ugh, consoles.
For example, my PC. It's got a CPU from 2005, and a graphics card from 2005. My CPU can still run all the new games without any major problems, as they're a lot more graphics-intense than CPU-intense. So, I now buy a new graphics card for 100€ that will let me run Crysis on high, as opposed to what my old card could do; low. If that would be a console, I would have to buy a new console every two years, wasting a lot of resources and money. I can still use my old:
CPU
RAM
HDD
Chassis
PSU
Cooler
Optical drive
etc
when I purchase a cheap graphics card. That's basically impossible on consoles. Plus, PCs are a lot more fun, from a technology point of view.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP