nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6748|New Haven, CT
Using ethanol should not make fuel and transportation prices cheaper.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7190|Cambridge (UK)

Spark wrote:

Problem: if you use more ethanol, less food. Food prices go up as their is less supply.

If you use LESS ethanol, transportation costs go up. Adds to costs, food prices go up anyway.
Depends where you get the ethanol from - there are better sources than corn - i.e. non-edible ones.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7098|Canberra, AUS
Well, it seems to.

Otherwise there would be no real incentive for using ethanol (10% ethanol fuel is about 4-5 cents cheaper than standard unleaded ATM)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6748|New Haven, CT

Spark wrote:

Well, it seems to.

Otherwise there would be no real incentive for using ethanol (10% ethanol fuel is about 4-5 cents cheaper than standard unleaded ATM)
And the resulting 10% decrease in gas mileage makes it so much cheaper...
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7098|Canberra, AUS

nukchebi0 wrote:

Spark wrote:

Well, it seems to.

Otherwise there would be no real incentive for using ethanol (10% ethanol fuel is about 4-5 cents cheaper than standard unleaded ATM)
And the resulting 10% decrease in gas mileage makes it so much cheaper...
...source?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6748|New Haven, CT

Spark wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Spark wrote:

Well, it seems to.

Otherwise there would be no real incentive for using ethanol (10% ethanol fuel is about 4-5 cents cheaper than standard unleaded ATM)
And the resulting 10% decrease in gas mileage makes it so much cheaper...
...source?
My car's odometer, my father's Visa receipt, and my Ti-84 Plus Silver Edition.

Edit: I live in Oregon. We have E-10.

Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-05-04 23:32:40)

LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6803|MN

Spark wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

Spark wrote:

Well, it seems to.

Otherwise there would be no real incentive for using ethanol (10% ethanol fuel is about 4-5 cents cheaper than standard unleaded ATM)
And the resulting 10% decrease in gas mileage makes it so much cheaper...
...source?
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/12 … s-cer.html

Results may vary!
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7098|Canberra, AUS
Yeah. I would be surprised if ethanol was half as efficient as petrol...

EDIT: Everywhere has E10 now. Most service stations are displaying the discount price for E10 instead of petrol. Draw from that what you will...

Last edited by Spark (2008-05-05 02:16:21)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
RoosterCantrell
Goodbye :)
+399|6904|Somewhere else

woah woah WOAH everybody!

Rammunition is afk I guess, So I WILL fill in.


THIS thread is about The United States of Americunts' President blaming other countries for things that are actually the U.S.' Fault.

so "can we please not change the subject and stick to the question, thank you"

Talking about ethanol has nothing to do with Americunts being Americunts, along with thier americunt President.  However, if you want to bring up something other than the article posted, as long is it slanders Amerikkka, then it's ok.

Of course, I doubt I can get you Amerigas to do that, since you are all so stupid, and are overwieght sheep.
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7130

RoosterCantrell wrote:

woah woah WOAH everybody!

Rammunition is afk I guess, So I WILL fill in.


THIS thread is about The United States of Americunts' President blaming other countries for things that are actually the U.S.' Fault.

so "can we please not change the subject and stick to the question, thank you"

Talking about ethanol has nothing to do with Americunts being Americunts, along with thier americunt President.  However, if you want to bring up something other than the article posted, as long is it slanders Amerikkka, then it's ok.

Of course, I doubt I can get you Amerigas to do that, since you are all so stupid, and are overwieght sheep.
I can't tell if that was sarcasm or what.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard