well saidBraddock wrote:
Anything that questions the apartheid country you live in seems to be boring.Lisik wrote:
Just another boring anti-israeli article.rammunition wrote:
Your thoughts and comments on this
As Serge pointed out the guy who wrote it is obviously Jewish and as such it can't be as easily dismissed as something written by, for example an Iranian (or someone with an apparent reason for bias). Him being Jewish does not mean he is not biased one way or another but it certainly makes it more interesting as a source...if I was reading an article on Loyalist paramilitary activity in Northern Ireland written by a Republican Sinn Fein politician I'd be very wary of the views being expressed given the inherent bias, but if it was written by a member of the Loyalist community I'd certainly be more likely to give it credence.
Have i right to say the article is boring without get my brains fucked?
You have the right to have whatever opinion you want but don't be surprised to find people wanting to debate with you over it when you post it is a forum called "Debate and Serious Talk".Lisik wrote:
Have i right to say the article is boring without get my brains fucked?
Nothing really, but thanks for asking anyway.Lisik wrote:
I just told my opinion what the fuck do you want?sergeriver wrote:
I doubt it very much that you read the article, and how the fuck do you want anyone to support Israel policies even being Jewish? Half of my family are Jews and I don't support apartheid policies, so what's your point? Anything that doesn't fit your own agenda is boring? Good luck with your "I don't give a fuck for those who don't agree with Israel" attitude.Lisik wrote:
I got the point so i will say it another way...
Just another boring anti-israeli article by Richar Silverstein the jew.
You didn't read the article.Lisik wrote:
Have i right to say the article is boring without get my brains fucked?
You will not belive but i even read the comments. Here is one...sergeriver wrote:
You didn't read the article.Lisik wrote:
Have i right to say the article is boring without get my brains fucked?
Or why not try another definiton of hypocrisy:
"Iran, while officially calling for the destruction of Israel, is happily selling it the oil it needs to keep going."
Nah, but hypocrisy aint the point is it?
Wow. A country acted in its own interests, which happened to be contrary to its public position on something.
Shocking.
That never happens anywhere else.
Or not.
Shocking.
That never happens anywhere else.
Or not.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
And how is that comment anti-Israel?Lisik wrote:
You will not belive but i even read the comments. Here is one...sergeriver wrote:
You didn't read the article.Lisik wrote:
Have i right to say the article is boring without get my brains fucked?Or why not try another definiton of hypocrisy:
"Iran, while officially calling for the destruction of Israel, is happily selling it the oil it needs to keep going."
Nah, but hypocrisy aint the point is it?
"Israel complained too, describing the Swiss minister's visit to Tehran as an "act unfriendly to Israel"
So no one is allowed to trade with whomever Israel determines to be unfriendly. That covers most of the planet.
So no one is allowed to trade with whomever Israel determines to be unfriendly. That covers most of the planet.
Ermmm isnt there is a difference between words "article" and "comment" ? or i missing something? were did i sayd "comment anti-israel"?sergeriver wrote:
And how is that comment anti-Israel?Lisik wrote:
You will not belive but i even read the comments. Here is one...sergeriver wrote:
You didn't read the article.Or why not try another definiton of hypocrisy:
"Iran, while officially calling for the destruction of Israel, is happily selling it the oil it needs to keep going."
Nah, but hypocrisy aint the point is it?
Have a mint, pls. How is this article anti-Israel?Lisik wrote:
Ermmm isnt there is a difference between words "article" and "comment" ? or i missing something? were did i sayd "comment anti-israel"?sergeriver wrote:
And how is that comment anti-Israel?Lisik wrote:
You will not belive but i even read the comments. Here is one...sergeriver wrote:
You didn't read the article.
lolFEOS wrote:
Wow. A country acted in its own interests, which happened to be contrary to its public position on something.
Shocking.
That never happens anywhere else.
Or not.
The definition of hypocrisy is how the Euroweinies...i mean rest of the world expects the Israelis to pull back to start peace but knows full well the militants wont follow suit. That's hypocrisy.
A note on "hypocrisy" (hope I spelled that right)...
Aside of it being our soldiers killed in Iraq, I find it laughable that we (the US) are crying foul play because Iran is fighting us vicariously...just as we did the Soviets via the Mujahideen of Afghanistan. And that's if it's even true (which it probably is, though I won't believe US Intel saying so).
Aside of it being our soldiers killed in Iraq, I find it laughable that we (the US) are crying foul play because Iran is fighting us vicariously...just as we did the Soviets via the Mujahideen of Afghanistan. And that's if it's even true (which it probably is, though I won't believe US Intel saying so).
the politicians say one thing but do another. Hypocritical on Irans,Israels and the U.S's side
bumping the post to say nothing?
i haven't been on all day, if i wanted to "bump" a thread i would have done them to all of my threads.Pug wrote:
bumping the post to say nothing?
well, my bad...apologies
no probs.