Maybe BF2 is best played with no restricting rules? But of course you would know nothing of that.
Poll
Do you uncap rape?
| Yes | 72% | 72% - 173 | ||||
| No | 27% | 27% - 65 | ||||
| Total: 238 | ||||||
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
Absolutely, and all the geeks that prattle on about "the way the game is supposed to be played" make meN00bkilla55404 wrote:
Maybe BF2 is best played with no restricting rules?
There's like one good no silly rules server down here Texas. Addicted-2-games are good too, but they died with the release of CoD4.3lmo wrote:
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
no rules karkand infantry servers are normally 95% claymores and 5% nades, I'd rather risk getting banned raping an uncap on a server that has rules than do it legitly and get skillbombed every 10 seconds3lmo wrote:
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
I don't have sympathy for people playing Karkand too much. Let them nade spam one another
Now that right there is funny. You guys hate these "gay" rules on servers, but yet they are the only ones that are populated. Hmmmm must be a reason there. I guess I'll go play in my "gay" server now. Looks like there are 58 players in there at the time of this post (I know it fluctuates).3lmo wrote:
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
Last edited by NUNYA! Bluecow003 (2008-05-18 17:42:33)
CoD4 + GTA IV + three year old game (bf2) = low populated servers. That doesn't mean your server is popular because of the rules you employ. That is more likely that your server is one of the few that are left. Just because ur server is populated doesn't mean it is necessarily all that great. You can go out and run head first into a parked truck but it doesn't necessarily mean it is good for you.NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Now that right there is funny. You guys hate these "gay" rules on servers, but yet they are the only ones that are populated. Hmmmm must be a reason there. I guess I'll go play in my "gay" server now. Looks like there are 58 players in there at the time of this post (I know it fluctuates).3lmo wrote:
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
Edit: but then again, we discussed this two years ago when BF2 was relevant. Discussing it now makes as much sense as you thinking your server is popular because of your rules...
Last edited by killer21 (2008-05-18 17:56:29)
Oh your comments make me laugh. I enjoy them. You're trying to make a point that BF2 is old and irrelevant now, but yet you still participate in debates about this irrelevant game. Good stuff. And doing a search for ranked Bf2 servers, there are still 2,358 servers listed:killer21 wrote:
CoD4 + GTA IV + three year old game (bf2) = low populated servers. That doesn't mean your server is popular because of the rules you employ. That is more likely that your server is one of the few that are left. Just because ur server is populated doesn't mean it is necessarily all that great. You can go out and run head first into a parked truck but it doesn't necessarily mean it is good for you.
Edit: but then again, we discussed this two years ago when BF2 was relevant. Discussing it now makes as much sense as you thinking your server is popular because of your rules...
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php? … p;game=bf2
No big deal though. I guess since the game is irrelevant and old, you better stop wasting your time discussing it. Or continue actually, I enjoy the humor in your posts.
wrongNUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Oh your comments make me laugh. I enjoy them. You're trying to make a point that BF2 is old and irrelevant now, but yet you still participate in debates about this irrelevant game. Good stuff. And doing a search for ranked Bf2 servers, there are still 2,358 servers listed:killer21 wrote:
CoD4 + GTA IV + three year old game (bf2) = low populated servers. That doesn't mean your server is popular because of the rules you employ. That is more likely that your server is one of the few that are left. Just because ur server is populated doesn't mean it is necessarily all that great. You can go out and run head first into a parked truck but it doesn't necessarily mean it is good for you.
Edit: but then again, we discussed this two years ago when BF2 was relevant. Discussing it now makes as much sense as you thinking your server is popular because of your rules...
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php? … p;game=bf2
No big deal though. I guess since the game is irrelevant and old, you better stop wasting your time discussing it. Or continue actually, I enjoy the humor in your posts.
just give up dude; you lost a long time ago.
Hahaha, where's the score? I wasn't keeping track, nor did I know I was supposed to. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. Just discussing it. No harm in that, right?Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
wrongNUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Oh your comments make me laugh. I enjoy them. You're trying to make a point that BF2 is old and irrelevant now, but yet you still participate in debates about this irrelevant game. Good stuff. And doing a search for ranked Bf2 servers, there are still 2,358 servers listed:killer21 wrote:
CoD4 + GTA IV + three year old game (bf2) = low populated servers. That doesn't mean your server is popular because of the rules you employ. That is more likely that your server is one of the few that are left. Just because ur server is populated doesn't mean it is necessarily all that great. You can go out and run head first into a parked truck but it doesn't necessarily mean it is good for you.
Edit: but then again, we discussed this two years ago when BF2 was relevant. Discussing it now makes as much sense as you thinking your server is popular because of your rules...
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php? … p;game=bf2
No big deal though. I guess since the game is irrelevant and old, you better stop wasting your time discussing it. Or continue actually, I enjoy the humor in your posts.
just give up dude; you lost a long time ago.
Also, in the post you quoted from me, what exactly was wrong in my post since you specifically quoted that statement? Just curious, I couldn't follow what was erroneous in my post.
NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Hahaha, where's the score? I wasn't keeping track, nor did I know I was supposed to. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. Just discussing it. No harm in that, right?Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
wrongNUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Oh your comments make me laugh. I enjoy them. You're trying to make a point that BF2 is old and irrelevant now, but yet you still participate in debates about this irrelevant game. Good stuff. And doing a search for ranked Bf2 servers, there are still 2,358 servers listed:
http://www.game-monitor.com/search.php? … p;game=bf2
No big deal though. I guess since the game is irrelevant and old, you better stop wasting your time discussing it. Or continue actually, I enjoy the humor in your posts.
just give up dude; you lost a long time ago.
Also, in the post you quoted from me, what exactly was wrong in my post since you specifically quoted that statement? Just curious, I couldn't follow what was erroneous in my post.
Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
http://www.radioopensource.org/wp-conte … burger.jpgNUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Hahaha, where's the score? I wasn't keeping track, nor did I know I was supposed to. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. Just discussing it. No harm in that, right?Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
wrong
just give up dude; you lost a long time ago.
Also, in the post you quoted from me, what exactly was wrong in my post since you specifically quoted that statement? Just curious, I couldn't follow what was erroneous in my post.
It's called cutting off reinforcements, aka interdiction.
One of the reasons why I haven't played BF2 in the past few months is the stupid server rules. If a team can't get out of an uncap, then rape isn't the right word. Fair play is alright, but I read that to mean no hack/glitch/ect. But if 10 guys cluster on USS ESSEX, waiting for that one F-35 to spawn, then they're prime targets for an arty strike.
As for the age of the game, I'm gettting my FPS fix from America's Army Online and Day of Defeat (The original half life mod). In both, I have no problems finding populated servers, and both are atleast twice the age of BF2. If the server owners would allow the game to be played as Dice/EA invisioned it, it is a fun game. But when I have to read a crap load of server unique rules (assuming they're posted on the splash page, and not on a webpage somewhere) to play, screw it. Those rules are are to make the server n00b friendly. This board pissed and moaned everytime EA changed the game to make it n00b friendly (nerfing guns, ect).
One of the reasons why I haven't played BF2 in the past few months is the stupid server rules. If a team can't get out of an uncap, then rape isn't the right word. Fair play is alright, but I read that to mean no hack/glitch/ect. But if 10 guys cluster on USS ESSEX, waiting for that one F-35 to spawn, then they're prime targets for an arty strike.
As for the age of the game, I'm gettting my FPS fix from America's Army Online and Day of Defeat (The original half life mod). In both, I have no problems finding populated servers, and both are atleast twice the age of BF2. If the server owners would allow the game to be played as Dice/EA invisioned it, it is a fun game. But when I have to read a crap load of server unique rules (assuming they're posted on the splash page, and not on a webpage somewhere) to play, screw it. Those rules are are to make the server n00b friendly. This board pissed and moaned everytime EA changed the game to make it n00b friendly (nerfing guns, ect).
Guy.Buddy.Friend wrote:
http://www.nataliedee.com/030804/yes.jpg
Ah the intelligence of this forum never ceases to entertain me. Quality responses to be sure. Please, continue.Eye-GiZzLe wrote:
http://www.radioopensource.org/wp-conte … burger.jpg
looks like 77% of bf players plays because of points. i think thats sad..
n0bs
n0bs
Bluecow has a point, the argument was degraded to cat pix! At least it wasn't a flame fest, but still kinda embarrassing.
Exactly, I like to have discussions. It's a little difficult though with responses like the ones I quoted above. I don't know, some people don't care to discuss things though (even on a discussion forum, haha).
My view on it is that this game is modelled on a war game, right? So it is supposed to be played as close to "real" war as possible. Not allowing people to attack one base is unrealistic, just because it has a red line through it? And people buy a war game, to experience "virtual war", right? Well, most do.
I will admit, that I don't play Vehicle servers, only Infantry servers, but on most of them, there is a rule enforced not to attack the uncap. BUT, on 6/10 games, if i'm playing with say .Sup or Jamesey or whatever, the USMC team, WILL NOT get out of their base the entire round, and I am not just going to sit at the fucking bottom whilst the pussy ass US players stand there raining down grenades on us, because they KNOW that people can't come up. I always go into the uncap, sit on the hill, and snipe with my AK.. And even in games when the US can get out, there are people who will just sit there and nade, so punishment must be swift..
So, in short, yes, I do uncap rape, because 1) I go where the battle is and 2) If that team does not have the skill, or just plain chooses not to leave the uncap, then they deserve it!
I will admit, that I don't play Vehicle servers, only Infantry servers, but on most of them, there is a rule enforced not to attack the uncap. BUT, on 6/10 games, if i'm playing with say .Sup or Jamesey or whatever, the USMC team, WILL NOT get out of their base the entire round, and I am not just going to sit at the fucking bottom whilst the pussy ass US players stand there raining down grenades on us, because they KNOW that people can't come up. I always go into the uncap, sit on the hill, and snipe with my AK.. And even in games when the US can get out, there are people who will just sit there and nade, so punishment must be swift..
So, in short, yes, I do uncap rape, because 1) I go where the battle is and 2) If that team does not have the skill, or just plain chooses not to leave the uncap, then they deserve it!
#rekt
Wait? NUNYA? Didnt that clan ban me for "owning the members so much that you must hack?"
And do they not offer gifts for people that join their server??
Seems pretty sad tbh.
Seems pretty sad tbh.
its not smart to discuss Here! if u try to, somone just says "bitch bitch whine whine"NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Exactly, I like to have discussions. It's a little difficult though with responses like the ones I quoted above. I don't know, some people don't care to discuss things though (even on a discussion forum, haha).
I haven't mentioned your server as gay for once, so where do you get that from? Also, no rules servers need less admins, and to my experience don't really have a bounded clan, so they won't fill the server while it's still empty. As with your server, admins will join to get the server started.NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Now that right there is funny. You guys hate these "gay" rules on servers, but yet they are the only ones that are populated. Hmmmm must be a reason there. I guess I'll go play in my "gay" server now. Looks like there are 58 players in there at the time of this post (I know it fluctuates).3lmo wrote:
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
I never said you did, someone else did, but you seemed to both be in agreement that "no rule" servers are the best way to play the game. See below.3lmo wrote:
I haven't mentioned your server as gay for once, so where do you get that from? Also, no rules servers need less admins, and to my experience don't really have a bounded clan, so they won't fill the server while it's still empty. As with your server, admins will join to get the server started.NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Now that right there is funny. You guys hate these "gay" rules on servers, but yet they are the only ones that are populated. Hmmmm must be a reason there. I guess I'll go play in my "gay" server now. Looks like there are 58 players in there at the time of this post (I know it fluctuates).3lmo wrote:
There are no rules servers, and they kick ass! Barely populated tho...
killer21 wrote:
lol. Your excuse for running a server with training wheels is amusing to me. I have run three servers in my time playing BF2. None of them had gay rules in which you had to help the other team survive. But hey, as you have stated many times as if it is a really big deal, you have a server and you run it. Congrats. Go get yourself a job because you have rules on a BF2 server that are pretty lame. You rock. I'll stop by your gay little server just to rape. Get your !b ready.NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
I understand. I guess it's different when you have a server to run.
Is that your in-game name? You're not in our ban list. If you were banned, it wasn't me who did it.N00bkilla55404 wrote:
Wait? NUNYA? Didnt that clan ban me for "owning the members so much that you must hack?"
Why not just join the other team and help them win then? Seems very boring to just sit and watch them in the uncap or snipe at them. I think it would be more fun to cap some flags. I must be crazy or something though because obviously it's way better to baserape.Mint Sauce wrote:
My view on it is that this game is modelled on a war game, right? So it is supposed to be played as close to "real" war as possible. Not allowing people to attack one base is unrealistic, just because it has a red line through it? And people buy a war game, to experience "virtual war", right? Well, most do.
I will admit, that I don't play Vehicle servers, only Infantry servers, but on most of them, there is a rule enforced not to attack the uncap. BUT, on 6/10 games, if i'm playing with say .Sup or Jamesey or whatever, the USMC team, WILL NOT get out of their base the entire round, and I am not just going to sit at the fucking bottom whilst the pussy ass US players stand there raining down grenades on us, because they KNOW that people can't come up. I always go into the uncap, sit on the hill, and snipe with my AK.. And even in games when the US can get out, there are people who will just sit there and nade, so punishment must be swift..
So, in short, yes, I do uncap rape, because 1) I go where the battle is and 2) If that team does not have the skill, or just plain chooses not to leave the uncap, then they deserve it!
http://battlefield.4players.de/content/images/ak101.jpg
Last edited by NUNYA! Bluecow003 (2008-05-19 06:22:10)
Do you have to argue with everyone's views? You say you're having a discussion, but in reality, you're just trying to force your view on others, adn 'poo-poo' other's views.NUNYA! Bluecow003 wrote:
Why not just join the other team and help them win then? Seems very boring to just sit and watch them in the uncap or snipe at them. I think it would be more fun to cap some flags. I must be crazy or something though because obviously it's way better to baserape.Mint Sauce wrote:
My view on it is that this game is modelled on a war game, right? So it is supposed to be played as close to "real" war as possible. Not allowing people to attack one base is unrealistic, just because it has a red line through it? And people buy a war game, to experience "virtual war", right? Well, most do.
I will admit, that I don't play Vehicle servers, only Infantry servers, but on most of them, there is a rule enforced not to attack the uncap. BUT, on 6/10 games, if i'm playing with say .Sup or Jamesey or whatever, the USMC team, WILL NOT get out of their base the entire round, and I am not just going to sit at the fucking bottom whilst the pussy ass US players stand there raining down grenades on us, because they KNOW that people can't come up. I always go into the uncap, sit on the hill, and snipe with my AK.. And even in games when the US can get out, there are people who will just sit there and nade, so punishment must be swift..
So, in short, yes, I do uncap rape, because 1) I go where the battle is and 2) If that team does not have the skill, or just plain chooses not to leave the uncap, then they deserve it!
http://battlefield.4players.de/content/images/ak101.jpg
And why the fuck would I join the US team if i'm already on the MEC team, i'm not giving up my precious AK!!
#rekt