.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6930|The Twilight Zone

tobz102 wrote:

q6600

2.4 clock
mine 2.3
really tht bigger difference?
Q6600@2.4>OCed Phenom 9600@2.4
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7320|Reykjavík, Iceland.

tobz102 wrote:

q6600

2.4 clock
mine 2.3
really tht bigger difference?
2mb L2 cache vs 8mb tbh.
02fxnmaurer
Member
+75|6959|Birmingham UK
thts bullshit specially when similar systems to tobz are running 11600 3d marks ?.....wattt the fuckkkkk
tobz102
Member
+11|6416|UK
overclock utility me
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7126

Read from here onwards
tobz102
Member
+11|6416|UK
ok, weve established the q6600 is better
but i really dont think its 100fps better
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6930|The Twilight Zone

tobz102 wrote:

ok, weve established the q6600 is better
but i really dont think its 100fps better
1 Fps less than your GFX requires and it will start bottlenecking.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7126

It's possible that the guy in the video has overclocked both his CPU and GPU.
tobz102
Member
+11|6416|UK
ok...nd also why do no utilities...even ntune pick up my system configuration
nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6801|New Haven, CT
Before you morons say his processor is bottlenecking, shouldn't you look
at how 3dMark 06 utilizes quadcores, and look at the difference in GPU test performance with each processor.

Pointless hating makes you look really, really, stupid.

Last edited by nukchebi0 (2008-05-19 00:55:49)

GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6891|Finland

nukchebi0 wrote:

Before you morons say his processor is bottlenecking, shouldn't you look
at how 3dMark 06 utilizes quadcores, and look at the difference in GPU test performance with each processor.

Pointless hating makes you look really, really, stupid.
It does bottleneck. Even my Q6600 at 3.6ghz was a bottleneck in 3Dmark.

And Q6600 >>>>>>> Phenoms in games.

2.3GHz is pretty low for AMD CPU. There is your problem. The CPU clocks just do matter that much.

Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-05-19 01:08:57)

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6930|The Twilight Zone

nukchebi0 wrote:

Before you morons say his processor is bottlenecking, shouldn't you look
at how 3dMark 06 utilizes quadcores, and look at the difference in GPU test performance with each processor.

Pointless hating makes you look really, really, stupid.
No one is hating no one/anything. Its just so obvious his CPU is bottlenecking. And Tobz if someone recommends a C2D over Phenom, listen to him.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6940|cuntshitlake

Wait what. My E2180 @ 3.0GHz got some 2550 CPU score... Are Phenoms really that bad or did I miss something?
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7126

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Wait what. My E2180 @ 3.0GHz got some 2550 CPU score... Are Phenoms really that bad or did I miss something?
They're not bad, just the C2D/Q's are much better.
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|7320|Reykjavík, Iceland.
My E6600 gets a higher score than the Phenom 9600...
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6940|cuntshitlake

ghettoperson wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Wait what. My E2180 @ 3.0GHz got some 2550 CPU score... Are Phenoms really that bad or did I miss something?
They're not bad, just the C2D/Q's are much better.
But seriously, E6750 @ stock gets about the same score as this @ 50% OC. Fucking epic.

Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2008-05-19 05:53:20)

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard