unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7216|PNW

I don't agree with 5. Tanks are still just as vulnerable to planes and choppers.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7119|Canberra, AUS
I don't see any problem with infantry combat. Seems the same to me. Adapt and conquer.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7119|Canberra, AUS

DUFFKING wrote:

"God thank you, I just registered JUST to say that, no death unless you respawn.  smile, keep fighting!!!"

People get fucked off if they get shot, revived, shot, revived, shot, revived, shot.... they don't really care that you dont count as a death, they want to get the hell up and do something, rather than have to sit there being able to anything because some idiot keeps reivings them
That annoys the hell out of the reviver too (or at least me). Once it got so bad that I went 'fucking hell, MOVE!' and refused to revive the guy.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
hutchy52
Member
+12|7198

armin wrote:

5. Tanks are now unchallenged by airplanes and helicopters... mmmm tank people
You are kidding right, tanks still don't stand a chance against helicopters.
Kayback
Member
+-1|7256

ComradeWho wrote:

Dr_3V|L wrote:

BF2 shouldn't be about realism... it should be about a balanced game. And it isn't now.
seriously. the most annoying part of this patch is "no more c4 whoring"
first of all you can throw c4 in real life. period, just shut up about how that's unrealistic. i'm not even a spec ops person but the idea of this annoys me
Ummm, I'm assuming you actually have absolutely zero experience using explosives IRL hey?

While you definately CAN throw blocks of C4 and detonators around IRL, they aren't going to do much.

Seriously it takes a hell of a lot more planning, placing and more importantly tamping the explosives to get them to do what you want.

While a sachel of C4 lying on the ground will damage people, and possibly tear up parts of a tank that drives directly over it, it ain't going to do SHIT to a bridge. It really isn't. The explosion will be very pretty and it will make a loud noise, but throwing C4 ontop of a bridge will not break it. It probably wouldn't break a tank either.

I do understand sacrifices have been made for gameplay, like the Claymore mines, which IRL take around 5 minutes to set up, and are only clacker detonated nowadays, however stop bitching about the lack of C4 throwingness.

You could used to throw them the same distance as grenades, and then blow the crap out of everything. This is NOT what the game intended. Like the M203 instagib rifle, they were being abused.

The C4 demolition packs were designed to, suprise supreise, demo stuff. Blow up bridges, blow up utilities, set traps on enemy tanks, copters and vehicles. Create choke points. Be used defensively. Not as big asssed grenades.

Here is an idea, you want to blow up a tank? How about using the ENGINEERS ANTI TANK MINES? Or is that not playing by the rules?

The Spec Ops was always meant to be a jack of all trades yes, this is why he has a long ranged rifle, an up close supressed pistol, grenades and these big explosives which could be used as an anti tank weapon. HOWEVER HE WAS NOT MEANT TO REPLACE assault, sniper and anti tank.

Adapt and overcome.

KBK

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard